» Articles » PMID: 35456285

The Future in Standards of Care for Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery to Improve Training and Education

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Apr 23
PMID 35456285
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Standards of care offer doctors and patients the confidence that an established quality, evidence-based, care is provided, and represent a tool for optimal responding to the population's needs. It is expected that they will increasingly express a multimodal relationship with gynecologic laparoscopy. Laparoscopy is, now, a standard procedure in operative gynecology, standards are embedded in many laparoscopic procedures, standardization of the skills/competency assessment has been progressively developed, and the proof of competency in laparoscopy may become a standard of care. A continuous development of surgical education includes standard equipment (that may bring value for future advance), standardized training, testing (and performance) assessment, educational process and outcome monitoring/evaluation, patients' care, and protection, etc. Standards of care and training have a reciprocally sustaining relationship, as training is an essential component of standards of care while care is provided at higher standards after a structured training and as credentialing/certification reunites the two. It is envisaged that through development and implementation, the European wide standards of care in laparoscopic surgery (in close harmonization with personalized medicine) would lead to effective delivery of better clinical services and provide excellent training and education.

Citing Articles

Umbilical Complications That Require Surgical Intervention after Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery.

Sano R, Oka A, Hirata E, Ochiai H Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023; 11(11):e5391.

PMID: 37964921 PMC: 10642900. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005391.


Observation on the effect of intraoperative risk management combined with comfort nursing in gynecological laparoscopic surgery.

Li M, Yao X, Chao L Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(29):e34394.

PMID: 37478267 PMC: 10662797. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034394.

References
1.
Dallenbach P, Alec M, Boulvain M, Shabanov S . Outcomes of robotically assisted laparoscopic lateral suspension (RALLS) with mesh for anterior and apical prolapse. J Robot Surg. 2021; 16(2):287-294. PMC: 8960596. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01234-3. View

2.
Lerner V, Destephano C, Ulrich A, Han E, LeClaire E, Chen C . A Systematic Review of Validity Evidence for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Examination in Gynecology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021; 28(7):1313-1324. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.04.010. View

3.
Gumbs A, Hogle N, Fowler D . Evaluation of resident laparoscopic performance using global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills. J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 204(2):308-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.11.010. View

4.
. Guidelines for quality assurance. Council on Medical Service. JAMA. 1988; 259(17):2572-3. View

5.
Campo R, Puga M, Meier Furst R, Wattiez A, De Wilde R . Excellence needs training "Certified programme in endoscopic surgery". Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2015; 6(4):240-4. PMC: 4286864. View