» Articles » PMID: 35456243

Epigenetic Risks of Medically Assisted Reproduction

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Apr 23
PMID 35456243
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Since the birth of Louise Joy Brown, the first baby conceived via in vitro fertilization, more than 9 million children have been born worldwide using assisted reproductive technologies (ART). In vivo fertilization takes place in the maternal oviduct, where the unique physiological conditions guarantee the healthy development of the embryo. During early embryogenesis, a major wave of epigenetic reprogramming takes place that is crucial for the correct development of the embryo. Epigenetic reprogramming is susceptible to environmental changes and non-physiological conditions such as those applied during in vitro culture, including shift in pH and temperature, oxygen tension, controlled ovarian stimulation, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, as well as preimplantation embryo manipulations for genetic testing. In the last decade, concerns were raised of a possible link between ART and increased incidence of imprinting disorders, as well as epigenetic alterations in the germ cells of infertile parents that are transmitted to the offspring following ART. The aim of this review was to present evidence from the literature regarding epigenetic errors linked to assisted reproduction treatments and their consequences on the conceived children. Furthermore, we provide an overview of disease risk associated with epigenetic or imprinting alterations in children born via ART.

Citing Articles

Causes of embryo implantation failure: A systematic review and metaanalysis of procedures to increase embryo implantation potential.

Bulletti F, Sciorio R, Conforti A, De Luca R, Bulletti C, Palagiano A Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 15:1429193.

PMID: 40028443 PMC: 11867936. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1429193.


The most appropriate indicators of successful ovarian stimulation.

Roque M, Sunkara S Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025; 23(Suppl 1):5.

PMID: 39789602 PMC: 11714799. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-024-01331-6.


Applying an evolutionary perspective to assisted reproductive technologies.

Evans J, Garcia-Gonzalez F PNAS Nexus. 2024; 3(12):pgae512.

PMID: 39691447 PMC: 11650523. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae512.


Comparative analysis of ethical standards for the utilization of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Brazil: Resolutions from 1992 to 2023.

Guedes W, Santos L, Milanez V, Brito M, Moura G, Monteiro P JBRA Assist Reprod. 2024; 29(1):6-12.

PMID: 39688437 PMC: 11867254. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20240069.


The Role of One-Carbon Metabolism and Methyl Donors in Medically Assisted Reproduction: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Sfakianoudis K, Zikopoulos A, Grigoriadis S, Seretis N, Maziotis E, Anifandis G Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(9).

PMID: 38732193 PMC: 11084717. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25094977.


References
1.
Market-Velker B, Fernandes A, Mann M . Side-by-side comparison of five commercial media systems in a mouse model: suboptimal in vitro culture interferes with imprint maintenance. Biol Reprod. 2010; 83(6):938-50. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.110.085480. View

2.
Honguntikar S, Salian S, DSouza F, Uppangala S, Kalthur G, Adiga S . Epigenetic changes in preimplantation embryos subjected to laser manipulation. Lasers Med Sci. 2017; 32(9):2081-2087. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-017-2334-3. View

3.
Ceelen M, van Weissenbruch M, Roos J, Vermeiden J, van Leeuwen F, Delemarre-van de Waal H . Body composition in children and adolescents born after in vitro fertilization or spontaneous conception. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007; 92(9):3417-23. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2006-2896. View

4.
Potabattula R, Dittrich M, Schorsch M, Hahn T, Haaf T, El Hajj N . Male obesity effects on sperm and next-generation cord blood DNA methylation. PLoS One. 2019; 14(6):e0218615. PMC: 6597061. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218615. View

5.
Hart R, Norman R . The longer-term health outcomes for children born as a result of IVF treatment: Part I--General health outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2013; 19(3):232-43. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dms062. View