» Articles » PMID: 35456242

Biomechanical Effects of Plastic Heel Cup on Plantar Fasciitis Patients Evaluated by Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Apr 23
PMID 35456242
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The plastic heel cup has been adopted to treat plantar heel problems for years. However, its mechanisms and biomechanical effects are yet to be fully understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the plastic heel cup on the microchamber and macrochamber layers of the heel pad by comparing the stiffness (in terms of the shear wave speed) and thickness of these two layers with and without a plastic heel cup during static standing. Fifteen patients with unilateral plantar fasciitis were recruited. The shear wave speed and thickness of the microchamber and microchamber layers of each symptomatic heel pad during standing measured by ultrasound shear wave elastography were compared between conditions with and without a plastic heel cup. It was found that a plastic heel cup reduced the shear wave speed of the microchamber layer to 55.5% and increased its thickness to 137.5% compared with the condition without a plastic heel cup. For the microchamber layer, the shear wave speed was reduced to 89.7%, and thickness was increased to 113.6% compared with the condition without a plastic heel cup. The findings demonstrate that a plastic heel cup can help to reduce the stiffness and increase the thickness for both layers of the heel pad during standing, suggesting that the mechanism of a plastic heel cup, and its resulting biomechanical effect, is to reduce the internal stress of the heel pad by increasing its thickness through confinement.

Citing Articles

A narrative review of the measurement methods for biomechanical properties of plantar soft tissue in patients with diabetic foot.

Yang X, Peng Z, Liu X, Liu X, Lu S Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1332032.

PMID: 39135623 PMC: 11317276. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1332032.


Reliability and Validity of Shore Hardness in Plantar Soft Tissue Biomechanics.

Tonna R, Chatzistergos P, Wyatt O, Chockalingam N Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(2).

PMID: 38257632 PMC: 10818800. DOI: 10.3390/s24020539.


An exploratory study of dynamic foot shape measurements with 4D scanning system.

Zhang L, Yick K, Yue M, Yip J, Ng S Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):8628.

PMID: 37244970 PMC: 10224935. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35822-0.


Elasticity evaluation of the plantar fascia: A shear wave elastography study involving 33 early-stage plantar fasciopathy subjects.

Jiang Z, Shen H, Zhang Q, Ye G, Li X, Liu X Front Physiol. 2023; 13:1060728.

PMID: 36589438 PMC: 9801482. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1060728.

References
1.
Landorf K . Plantar heel pain and plantar fasciitis. BMJ Clin Evid. 2015; 2015. PMC: 4661045. View

2.
Chatzistergos P, Behforootan S, Allan D, Naemi R, Chockalingam N . Shear wave elastography can assess the in-vivo nonlinear mechanical behavior of heel-pad. J Biomech. 2018; 80:144-150. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.09.003. View

3.
Scranton Jr P, Pedegana L, Whitesel J . Gait analysis. Alterations in support phase forces using supportive devices. Am J Sports Med. 1982; 10(1):6-11. DOI: 10.1177/036354658201000102. View

4.
Stecco C, Corradin M, Macchi V, Morra A, Porzionato A, Biz C . Plantar fascia anatomy and its relationship with Achilles tendon and paratenon. J Anat. 2013; 223(6):665-76. PMC: 3842207. DOI: 10.1111/joa.12111. View

5.
Naemi R, Chockalingam N . Mathematical models to assess foot-ground interaction: an overview. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013; 45(8):1524-33. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31828be3a7. View