» Articles » PMID: 35454813

Ontologies and Knowledge Graphs in Oncology Research

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Apr 23
PMID 35454813
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The complexity of cancer research stems from leaning on several biomedical disciplines for relevant sources of data, many of which are complex in their own right. A holistic view of cancer-which is critical for precision medicine approaches-hinges on integrating a variety of heterogeneous data sources under a cohesive knowledge model, a role which biomedical ontologies can fill. This study reviews the application of ontologies and knowledge graphs in cancer research. In total, our review encompasses 141 published works, which we categorized under 14 hierarchical categories according to their usage of ontologies and knowledge graphs. We also review the most commonly used ontologies and newly developed ones. Our review highlights the growing traction of ontologies in biomedical research in general, and cancer research in particular. Ontologies enable data accessibility, interoperability and integration, support data analysis, facilitate data interpretation and data mining, and more recently, with the emergence of the knowledge graph paradigm, support the application of Artificial Intelligence methods to unlock new knowledge from a holistic view of the available large volumes of heterogeneous data.

Citing Articles

The Immunopeptidomics Ontology (ImPO).

Faria D, Eugenio P, Contreiras Silva M, Balbi L, Bedran G, Kallor A Database (Oxford). 2024; 2024.

PMID: 38857186 PMC: 11164101. DOI: 10.1093/database/baae014.


Developing a Novel Ontology for Cybersecurity in Internet of Medical Things-Enabled Remote Patient Monitoring.

Bughio K, Cook D, Shah S Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(9).

PMID: 38732910 PMC: 11086146. DOI: 10.3390/s24092804.


Using natural language processing to analyze unstructured patient-reported outcomes data derived from electronic health records for cancer populations: a systematic review.

Sim J, Huang X, Horan M, Baker J, Huang I Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024; 24(4):467-475.

PMID: 38383308 PMC: 11001514. DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2322664.


Coordinating virus research: The Virus Infectious Disease Ontology.

Beverley J, Babcock S, Carvalho G, Cowell L, Duesing S, He Y PLoS One. 2024; 19(1):e0285093.

PMID: 38236918 PMC: 10796065. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285093.

References
1.
Abeni E, Grossi I, Marchina E, Coniglio A, Incardona P, Cavalli P . DNA methylation variations in familial female and male breast cancer. Oncol Lett. 2021; 21(6):468. PMC: 8063268. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2021.12729. View

2.
Sarntivijai S, Lin Y, Xiang Z, Meehan T, Diehl A, Vempati U . CLO: The cell line ontology. J Biomed Semantics. 2015; 5:37. PMC: 4387853. DOI: 10.1186/2041-1480-5-37. View

3.
Li F, Du J, He Y, Song H, Madkour M, Rao G . Time event ontology (TEO): to support semantic representation and reasoning of complex temporal relations of clinical events. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020; 27(7):1046-1056. PMC: 7647306. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa058. View

4.
Xu X, Li M, Hu J, Chen Z, Yu J, Dong Y . Expression profile analysis identifies a two-gene signature for prediction of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patient survival. J Cancer Res Ther. 2018; 14(7):1525-1534. DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_557_18. View

5.
Chen H, Du J, Song H, Liu X, Jiang G, Tao C . Representation of Time-Relevant Common Data Elements in the Cancer Data Standards Repository: Statistical Evaluation of an Ontological Approach. JMIR Med Inform. 2018; 6(1):e7. PMC: 5843793. DOI: 10.2196/medinform.8175. View