» Articles » PMID: 35453256

Potential Blood Biomarkers for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2022 Apr 23
PMID 35453256
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Blood biomarkers are first-line tools for identifying periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). C-reactive protein (CRP) is currently recognized as the standard biomarker for PJI diagnosis. Other recently reported novel biomarkers, including plasma fibrinogen, platelet count, monocyte/lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet count/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), have also shown promise in diagnosing PJI. This study aimed to evaluate whether these biomarkers were superior to CRP for identifying PJI.

Methods: Patients who underwent revision hip or knee arthroplasty at our hospital from January 2008 to September 2020 were included consecutively and divided into infected and non-infected groups according to the 2013 International Consensus Meeting Criteria. Blood samples were collected preoperatively, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), CRP, interleukin-6, fibrinogen, platelet count, MLR, NLR, and PLR were analyzed. The diagnostic values of the tested biomarkers and their combinations were compared with CRP based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) using the z-test. Classification trees were constructed to explore more accurate combinations of the tested markers for identifying PJI.

Results: A total of 543 patients were included, of whom 245 had PJI. Among the tested biomarkers, CRP with a cutoff of 7.39 mg/L showed the highest AUC, which gave a sensitivity of 79.1% and specificity of 86.0%. The AUCs of pairwise combinations of tested markers including CRP also were inferior to CRP itself, as were combinations derived from classification trees.

Conclusions: Preoperative serum CRP with a low cutoff may be the best reliable blood biomarker for identifying PJI, and those traditional or novel available blood biomarkers could not further improve the diagnostic ability on the basis of CRP.

Citing Articles

Blood Cell Ratio Combinations for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Preliminary Study.

Yu Y, Wen Y, Xia J, Dong G, Niu Y Infect Drug Resist. 2025; 18:635-645.

PMID: 39911568 PMC: 11796439. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S489201.


Diagnostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and albumin-to-globulin ratio for periprosthetic joint infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chen C, Chen Y, Kuo Y, Liu Y, Huang S EFORT Open Rev. 2024; 9(12):1134-1143.

PMID: 39620558 PMC: 11619729. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-23-0206.


Association Between Indices of Peripheral Blood Inflammation and Cavitary Pulmonary Tuberculosis.

He X, Hou H, Jiang Y, Huang X Int J Gen Med. 2024; 17:5133-5142.

PMID: 39529941 PMC: 11552384. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S483185.


Different biomarker ratios in peripheral blood have limited value in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty: a single-center, retrospective study.

Deng L, Wang J, Yang G, Hou Y, Li K, Sun B BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):377.

PMID: 38741113 PMC: 11092178. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07499-7.


Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI) and Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR) Are Predictors of Good Outcomes in Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infections of Lower Limbs: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

Vitiello R, Smimmo A, Matteini E, Micheli G, Fantoni M, Ziranu A Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 38727424 PMC: 11083165. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12090867.


References
1.
Lu G, Li T, Ye H, Liu S, Zhang P, Wang W . D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020; 15(1):265. PMC: 7364596. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01761-z. View

2.
Shahi A, Kheir M, Tarabichi M, S Hosseinzadeh H, Tan T, Parvizi J . Serum D-Dimer Test Is Promising for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Timing of Reimplantation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017; 99(17):1419-1427. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01395. View

3.
Klug A, Gramlich Y, Rudert M, Drees P, Hoffmann R, Weissenberger M . The projected volume of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty will place an immense burden on future health care systems over the next 30 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 29(10):3287-3298. PMC: 7362328. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06154-7. View

4.
Wu H, Meng Z, Pan L, Liu H, Yang X, Yongping C . Plasma Fibrinogen Performs Better Than Plasma d-Dimer and Fibrin Degradation Product in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Determination of Reimplantation Timing. J Arthroplasty. 2020; 35(8):2230-2236. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.055. View

5.
Parvizi J, Gehrke T . Definition of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29(7):1331. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.009. View