» Articles » PMID: 35450104

Hybrid Mathieu Urethroplasty Vs. Tubularized Incised Plate Urethroplasty for the Management of Distal Penile Hypospadias With a Small Glans

Overview
Journal Front Pediatr
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2022 Apr 22
PMID 35450104
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Distal hypospadias is a common anomaly. Different surgical techniques have evolved through the years to manage this anomaly. Several factors may affect the prognosis. One of them is glans size. We compared the hybrid Mathieu urethroplasty (HMU) and the tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (TIPU) for the management of distal hypospadias with a small glans.

Methods: Sixty-eight patients with distal hypospadias were included and categorized into two groups. Group A ( = 33) and group B ( = 35) patients were treated by HMU and TIPU, respectively. All patients had a small glans. In group A, the patients underwent Mathieu urethroplasty plus a deep incision of the urethral plate. In group B, the patients underwent TIPU. Urethral stents were used in all cases. Hypospadias objective score evaluation (HOSE) was used to assess the results.

Results: Urethrocutaneous fistulae developed in two cases in group A and six cases in group B. Meatal stenosis was significantly lower (one case in group A vs. eight cases in group B). Glanular dehiscence occurred in two cases in group A and five cases in group B. The small glans strongly correlated with the development of both urethrocutaneous fistulae and meatal stenosis where the odd ratios were 3.500 (1.383-7.879) and 9.481 (1.114-12.669), respectively.

Conclusion: Both techniques showed efficacy during management of patients with a small glans. HMU had better outcomes, shorter duration of stent and lesser incidence of complications than TIPU. Small glans was significantly related to urethrocutaneous fistulae and meatal stenosis in group B.

Citing Articles

Application of local volume reduction of the dorsal glans groove in the repair of hypospadias with small glans: A retrospective study.

Lin H, Wang Y, Li S, Chen Z, Su L Pediatr Surg Int. 2025; 41(1):80.

PMID: 39953175 PMC: 11828791. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-025-05980-5.


Outcomes of Hypospadias Repair Based on Surgical Techniques: A 4-Year Retrospective Study.

Gabra A, Beyari B, AlNuwaiser S, Allaf S, Alghanmi R, Alrayiqi R Res Rep Urol. 2024; 16:79-87.

PMID: 38558857 PMC: 10981871. DOI: 10.2147/RRU.S451552.

References
1.
Silay M, t Hoen L, Bhatt N, Quaedackers J, Bogaert G, Dogan H . Are there any benefits of using an inlay graft in the treatment of primary hypospadias in children? A systematic review and metanalysis. J Pediatr Urol. 2021; 17(3):303-315. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.02.013. View

2.
Bush N, Villanueva C, Snodgrass W . Glans size is an independent risk factor for urethroplasty complications after hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Urol. 2015; 11(6):355.e1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.05.029. View

3.
Karabulut A, Sunay M, Erdem K, Emir L, Erol D . Retrospective analysis of the results obtained by using Mathieu and TIP urethroplasty techniques in recurrent hypospadias repairs. J Pediatr Urol. 2008; 4(5):359-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.02.007. View

4.
Wang F, Xu Y, Zhong H . Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the perimeatal-based flap and tubularized incised-plate techniques for primary hypospadias repair. Pediatr Surg Int. 2013; 29(8):811-21. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-013-3335-3. View

5.
Gupta V, Yadav S, AlAnzi T, Amer I, Salah M, Ahmed M . Grafted tubularised incised-plate urethroplasty: An objective assessment of outcome with lessons learnt from surgical experience with 263 cases. Arab J Urol. 2016; 14(4):299-304. PMC: 5122801. DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2016.09.002. View