Uncertainty Quantification of the Effects of Segmentation Variability in ECGI
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Despite advances in many of the techniques used in Electrocardiographic Imaging (ECGI), uncertainty remains insufficiently quantified for many aspects of the pipeline. The effect of geometric uncertainty, particularly due to segmentation variability, may be the least explored to date. We use statistical shape modeling and uncertainty quantification (UQ) to compute the effect of segmentation variability on ECGI solutions. The shape model was made with Shapeworks from nine segmentations of the same patient and incorporated into an ECGI pipeline. We computed uncertainty of the pericardial potentials and local activation times (LATs) using polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) implemented in UncertainSCI. Uncertainty in pericardial potentials from segmentation variation mirrored areas of high variability in the shape model, near the base of the heart and the right ventricular outflow tract, and that ECGI was less sensitive to uncertainty in the posterior region of the heart. Subsequently LAT calculations could vary dramatically due to segmentation variability, with a standard deviation as high as 126ms, yet mainly in regions with low conduction velocity. Our shape modeling and UQ pipeline presented possible uncertainty in ECGI due to segmentation variability and can be used by researchers to reduce said uncertainty or mitigate its effects. The demonstrated use of statistical shape modeling and UQ can also be extended to other types of modeling pipelines.
van der Waal J, Meijborg V, Coronel R, Dubois R, Oostendorp T Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1295103.
PMID: 38152249 PMC: 10752226. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1295103.
The Effect of Segmentation Variability in Forward ECG Simulation.
Ondrusova B, Boonstra M, Svehlikova J, Brooks D, van Dam P, Rababah A Comput Cardiol (2010). 2023; 49.
PMID: 37799667 PMC: 10552847. DOI: 10.22489/cinc.2022.325.
Effect of Segmentation Uncertainty on the ECGI Inverse Problem Solution and Source Localization.
Gassa N, Boonstra M, Ondrusova B, Svehlikova J, Brooks D, Narayan A Comput Cardiol (2010). 2023; 49.
PMID: 37786732 PMC: 10544807. DOI: 10.22489/cinc.2022.275.
Quantifying and Visualizing Uncertainty for Source Localization in Electrocardiographic Imaging.
Njeru D, Athawale T, France J, Johnson C Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis. 2023; 11(3):812-822.
PMID: 37284179 PMC: 10241371. DOI: 10.1080/21681163.2022.2113824.
Fruelund P, Van Dam P, Melgaard J, Sommer A, Lundbye-Christensen S, Sogaard P Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1087568.
PMID: 36818351 PMC: 9932809. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1087568.