» Articles » PMID: 35448953

Simultaneous or Staged Resection for Synchronous Liver Metastasis and Primary Rectal Cancer: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in France and by the time of the diagnosis, 15-25% of patients will suffer from synchronous liver metastases. Surgery associated to neoadjuvant treatment can cure these patients, but few studies focus only on rectal cancer. This study was meant to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent a simultaneous resection to those who underwent a staged resection (rectum first or liver first) in the University Hospital of Tours, France.

Methods: We assessed retrospectively a prospective maintained data base about the clinical, pathological and survival outcomes of patients who underwent a simultaneous or a staged resection in our center between 2010 and 2018. A propensity score matching was used, considering the initial characteristics of our groups.

Results: There were 70 patients (55/15 males, female respectively) with median age 60 (54-68) years. After matching 48 (69%) of them underwent a staged approach and 22 (31%) a simultaneous approach were compared. After PSM, there were 22 patients in each group. No differences were found in terms of morbidity (p = 0.210), overall survival (p = 0.517) and disease-free survival (p = 0.691) at 3 years after matching. There were significantly less recurrences in the simultaneous group (50% vs 81.8%, p = 0.026).

Conclusions: Simultaneous resection of the rectal primary cancer and synchronous liver metastases is safe and feasible with no difference in terms of survival.

Citing Articles

Safety and long-term prognosis of simultaneous versus staged resection in synchronous colorectal cancer with liver metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wang S, Song L, Tang J, Sun W, Li Z Eur J Med Res. 2022; 27(1):297.

PMID: 36529740 PMC: 9762091. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-022-00937-z.

References
1.
Chen J, Li Q, Wang C, Zhu H, Shi Y, Zhao G . Simultaneous vs. staged resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases: a metaanalysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010; 26(2):191-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-010-1018-2. View

2.
Baverud Olsson L, Buchli C, Villard C, Nilsson P . Differences in management and outcome for colon and rectal carcinoma with synchronous liver metastases: a population-based cohort study. Colorectal Dis. 2020; 23(4):860-867. PMC: 8246906. DOI: 10.1111/codi.15468. View

3.
Phelip J, Tougeron D, Leonard D, Benhaim L, Desolneux G, Dupre A . Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): French intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, SFR). Dig Liver Dis. 2019; 51(10):1357-1363. DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.05.035. View

4.
Conci S, Ruzzenente A, Pedrazzani C, Isa G, Turri G, Campagnaro T . Simultaneous approach for patients with synchronous colon and rectal liver metastases: Impact of site of primary on postoperative and oncological outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020; 47(4):842-849. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.09.015. View

5.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P . Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004; 240(2):205-13. PMC: 1360123. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. View