» Articles » PMID: 35446893

The Physical Activity Health Paradox and Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease: A Cross-sectional Compositional Data Analysis in the Copenhagen City Heart Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Apr 21
PMID 35446893
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Studies indicate that physical activity during leisure and work have opposite associations with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, referred to as the physical activity health paradox. We investigated how sedentary behaviour and physical activity types during leisure and work are associated with systolic blood pressure (SBP), waist circumference (WC), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in an adult general population sample using compositional data analysis.

Methods: Participants wore accelerometers for 7 days (right thigh and iliac crest; 24 h/day) and had their SBP, WC, and LDL-C measured. Accelerometer data was analysed using the software Acti4 to derive daily time spent in sedentary behaviour and physical activity types. The measure of association was quantified by reallocating time between sedentary behaviour and 1) walking, and 2) high-intensity physical activity (HIPA; sum of climbing stairs, running, cycling, and rowing), during both domains.

Results: In total, 652 participants were included in the analyses (median wear time: 6 days, 23.8 h/day). During leisure, the results indicated that less sedentary behaviour and more walking or more HIPA was associated with lower SBP, while during work, the findings indicated an association with higher SBP. During both domains, the findings indicated that less sedentary behaviour and more HIPA was associated with a smaller WC and lower LDL-C. However, the findings indicated less sedentary behaviour and more walking to be associated with a larger WC and higher LDL-C, regardless of domain.

Conclusions: During leisure, less sedentary behaviour and more walking or HIPA seems to be associated with a lower SBP, but, during work, it seems to be associated with a higher SBP. No consistent differences between domains were observed for WC and LDL-C. These findings highlight the importance of considering the physical activity health paradox, at least for some risk factors for CVD.

Citing Articles

Does the association between physical activity during work and leisure and blood pressure differ across sex? A cross-sectional compositional data analysis in a Danish population-based cohort.

Johansson M, Mortensen O, Hougaard C, Olsen M, Korshoj M BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):3290.

PMID: 39592981 PMC: 11600667. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20302-5.


A comparative analysis of 24-hour movement behaviors features using different accelerometer metrics in adults: Implications for guideline compliance and associations with cardiometabolic health.

Willems I, Verbestel V, Dumuid D, Calders P, Lapauw B, De Craemer M PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0309931.

PMID: 39288135 PMC: 11407674. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309931.


Leisure-time physical activity improves happiness, health, and mood profile better than work-related physical activity.

Skurvydas A, Istomina N, Dadeliene R, Majauskiene D, Strazdaite E, Lisinskiene A PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0307744.

PMID: 39046958 PMC: 11268669. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307744.


Reallocating just 10 min to moderate-to-vigorous physical activity from other components of 24-hour movement behaviors improves cardiovascular health in adults.

Ji Y, Atakan M, Yan X, Wu J, Kuang J, Peng L BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1768.

PMID: 38961409 PMC: 11221122. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19255-6.


Flemish critical care nurses' experiences regarding the influence of work-related demands on their health: a descriptive interpretive qualitative study.

Billiau L, Bolliger L, Clays E, Eeckloo K, Ketels M BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):387.

PMID: 38844928 PMC: 11155134. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02032-6.


References
1.
Vaara J, Kyrolainen H, Fogelholm M, Santtila M, Hakkinen A, Hakkinen K . Associations of leisure time, commuting, and occupational physical activity with physical fitness and cardiovascular risk factors in young men. J Phys Act Health. 2014; 11(8):1482-91. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2012-0504. View

2.
Olsen M, Angell S, Asma S, Boutouyrie P, Burger D, Chirinos J . A call to action and a lifecourse strategy to address the global burden of raised blood pressure on current and future generations: the Lancet Commission on hypertension. Lancet. 2016; 388(10060):2665-2712. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31134-5. View

3.
Skotte J, Korshoj M, Kristiansen J, Hanisch C, Holtermann A . Detection of physical activity types using triaxial accelerometers. J Phys Act Health. 2012; 11(1):76-84. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2011-0347. View

4.
Mackenbach J, Stirbu I, Roskam A, Schaap M, Menvielle G, Leinsalu M . Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(23):2468-81. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa0707519. View

5.
Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redon J, Zanchetti A, Bohm M . 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens. 2013; 31(7):1281-357. DOI: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc. View