Patients' Experiences and Perspectives of Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Care: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2022 Apr 21

PMID 35446885

Authors

Liam Carfora

Ciara M Foley

Phillip Hagi-Diakou

Phillip J Lesty

Marianne L Sandstrom

Imogen Ramsey

Saravana Kumar

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) or patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used by clinicians in everyday clinical practice to assess patients' perceptions of their own health and the healthcare they receive. By providing insight into how illness and interventions impact on patients' lives, they can help to bridge the gap between clinicians' expectations and what matters most to the patient. Given increasing focus on patient-centred care, the objective of this meta-synthesis was to summarise the qualitative evidence regarding patients' perspectives and experiences of the use of PROMs in clinical care.

Methods: A systematic search of the following databases was undertaken in August 2020: Medline, EMBASE, EMCARE, PsychINFO, Scopus and the Cochrane Library. This review was conducted and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research (CASP). A meta-ethnographic approach was used for data extraction and meta-synthesis of findings (PROSPERO registration: CRD42020202506).

Results: Fourteen studies from a range of countries with differing qualitative research methodologies were identified. Three themes were identified, namely 'patient preferences regarding PROMs', 'patient perceived benefits' and 'barriers to patient engagement with PROMs'. The perspectives of patients suggested they preferred PROMs that were simple and relevant to their conditions and found benefits in the way they facilitated self-reflection and effective communication with their clinicians. Patients, however, questioned the relevance of some individual questions and purpose.

Conclusion: PROMs can be a useful tool in the clinical setting by enabling individualisation and patient centred care. This meta-synthesis provides insights into what patients find beneficial as well as barriers to their engagement, highlighting the importance of educating patients about PROMs.

Citing Articles

Feasibility of implementing a codesigned patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) collection system for older adults in acute and sub-acute hospital settings.

Snowdon D, Marsh L, Srikanth V, Beare R, Barnden R, Parker E Qual Life Res. 2025; .

PMID: 40019679 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-025-03931-0.

Perceptions of Information Transferred in Review of Systems Forms: A Qualitative Description.

Ernecoff N, Arnold J, Krishnamurti T, Porter H, McCracken P, Veet C J Gen Intern Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39979706 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-025-09443-4.

Evaluating the implementation of PROMs and PREMs in routine clinical care: co-design of tools from the perspective of patients and healthcare professionals.

Amat-Fernandez C, Pardo Y, Ferrer M, Bosch G, Lizano-Barrantes C, Briseno-Diaz R Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025; 23(1):15.

PMID: 39962425 PMC: 11834580. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-025-02333-7.

Patients' experiences with the routine use of a clinical feedback system prior to consultations in ostomy care: a qualitative study.

Juvik L, Andersen J, Indrebo K, Sandvoll A Qual Life Res. 2025; .

PMID: 39955466 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-025-03916-z.

Defining patient-reported outcomes in diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease for clinical practice guidelines - perspectives of the taskforce of the Guideline Workshop.

Barnard-Kelly K, Battelino T, Brosius F, Ceriello A, Cosentino F, Gavin 3rd J Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025; 24(1):68.

PMID: 39920737 PMC: 11806799. DOI: 10.1186/s12933-024-02550-2.

References

Navarro-Millan I, Zinski A, Shurbaji S, Johnson B, Fraenkel L, Willig J . Perspectives of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients on Electronic Communication and Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection: A Qualitative Study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018; 71(1):80-87. PMC: 6388703. DOI: 10.1002/acr.23580. View

Bartlett S, De Leon E, Orbai A, Haque U, Manno R, Ruffing V . Patient-reported outcomes in RA care improve patient communication, decision-making, satisfaction and confidence: qualitative results. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019; 59(7):1662-1670. PMC: 7310086. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez506. View

Meerhoff G, Van Dulmen S, Maas M, Bakker-Jacobs A, Nijhuis-Van Der Sanden M, van der Wees P . Exploring the perspective of patients with musculoskeletal health problems in primary care on the use of patient-reported outcome measures to stimulate quality improvement in physiotherapist practice; a qualitative study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2019; 37(9):993-1004. DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1678205. View

Velikova G, Booth L, Smith A, Brown P, Lynch P, Brown J . Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(4):714-24. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.078. View

Basch E, Deal A, Kris M, Scher H, Hudis C, Sabbatini P . Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 34(6):557-65. PMC: 4872028. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0830. View

Basch E . Patient-Reported Outcomes - Harnessing Patients' Voices to Improve Clinical Care. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376(2):105-108. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1611252. View

Basch E, Barbera L, Kerrigan C, Velikova G . Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Medical Care. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018; 38:122-134. DOI: 10.1200/EDBK_200383. View

Aiyegbusi O, Isa F, Kyte D, Pankhurst T, Kerecuk L, Ferguson J . Patient and clinician opinions of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of patients with rare diseases: a qualitative study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020; 18(1):177. PMC: 7288678. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-020-01438-5. View

Duncan E, Murray J . The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12:96. PMC: 3358245. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-96. View

10.

Valderas J, Kotzeva A, Espallargues M, Guyatt G, Ferrans C, Halyard M . The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2008; 17(2):179-93. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-007-9295-0. View

11.

Girgis A, Durcinoska I, Arnold A, Delaney G . Interpreting and Acting on the PRO Scores From the Patient-reported Outcomes for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care) eHealth System. Med Care. 2019; 57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1:S85-S91. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001094. View

12.

Antunes B, Harding R, Higginson I . Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers. Palliat Med. 2013; 28(2):158-75. DOI: 10.1177/0269216313491619. View

13.

Santana M, Feeny D, Weinkauf J, Nador R, Kapasi A, Jackson K . The use of patient-reported outcomes becomes standard practice in the routine clinical care of lung-heart transplant patients. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2012; 1:93-105. PMC: 3417902. DOI: 10.2147/PROM.S11943. View

14.

Wikberg C, Pettersson A, Westman J, Bjorkelund C, Petersson E . Patients' perspectives on the use of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale self-assessment version in primary care. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016; 34(4):434-442. PMC: 5217279. DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2016.1248635. View

15.

Noonan V, Lyddiatt A, Ware P, Jaglal S, Riopelle R, Bingham 3rd C . Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series - Paper 3: patient-reported outcomes can facilitate shared decision-making and guide self-management. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 89:125-135. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.017. View

16.

Velikova G, Keding A, Harley C, Cocks K, Booth L, Smith A . Patients report improvements in continuity of care when quality of life assessments are used routinely in oncology practice: secondary outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer. 2010; 46(13):2381-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.04.030. View

17.

Aiyegbusi O, Kyte D, Cockwell P, Marshall T, Dutton M, Walmsley-Allen N . Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Management of Advanced CKD: A Qualitative Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019; 74(2):167-178. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.02.011. View

18.

Howell D, Molloy S, Wilkinson K, Green E, Orchard K, Wang K . Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Ann Oncol. 2015; 26(9):1846-1858. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv181. View

19.

Talib T, DeChant P, Kean J, Monahan P, Haggstrom D, Stout M . A qualitative study of patients' perceptions of the utility of patient-reported outcome measures of symptoms in primary care clinics. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27(12):3157-3166. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-1968-3. View

20.

Thestrup Hansen S, Kjerholt M, Christensen S, Brodersen J, Holge-Hazelton B . "I Am Sure That They Use My PROM Data for Something Important." A Qualitative Study About Patients' Experiences From a Hematologic Outpatient Clinic. Cancer Nurs. 2019; 43(5):E273-E282. DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000738. View