Hindfoot Alignment Assessment by the Foot-ankle Offset: a Diagnostic Study

Overview

Journal Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

Specialties Emergency Medicine
General Surgery
Orthopedics

Date 2022 Apr 21

PMID 35445859

Authors

Francois Lintz

Claire Ricard

Nazim Mehdi

Julien Laborde

Alessio Bernasconi

Gerard Richardi

Nicolas Sans

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Foot-ankle offset (FAO) is a three-dimensional (3D) biometric measurement of hindfoot alignment (HA) measured on images from weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT). Our aim was to investigate its distribution in a large cohort of patients, hypothesizing that threshold FAO values in valgus or varus could be identified as markers for increased risk of associated pathologies.

Materials And Methods: Prospective, monocentric, level II study including 125 subjects (250 feet) undergoing bilateral WBCT [58.4% female; mean age, 54 years (18-84)]. Patients were clinically assessed and pathologies were classified according to anatomic location (valgus- or varus associated). HA was measured using FAO on 3D datasets and tibio-calcaneal angles (TCA) on two-dimensional Saltzman-El-Khoury views. Threshold FAO values and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) were calculated for predicting increased risk of medial or lateral pathologies.

Results: Mean FAO was 1.65% ± 4.72 and mean TCA was 4.15° ± 7.67. Clinically, 167 feet were normal, 33 varus and 50 valgus with FAO values of 1.71% ± 3.16, - 4.96% ± 5.30 and 5.79% ± 3.77, respectively. Mean FAO was 0.99% ± 3.26 for non-pathological feet, - 2.53% ± 5.05 for lateral and 6.81% ± 2.70 for medial pathologies. Threshold FAO values of - 1.64% (51.4% sensitivity, 85.1% specificity, AUC = 0.72) and 2.71% (95% sensitivity, 82.8% specificity, AUC = 0.93) best predicted the risk of lateral and medial pathology, respectively.

Conclusion: Patients with FAO between - 1.64% and 2.71% had the least risk of degenerative foot and ankle pathology. This interval could be considered a target for patients undergoing realignment procedures.

Clinical Relevance: A "safe zone" for Foot Ankle Offset was described between - 1.64% and 2.71%, for which the risk of foot and ankle pathologies is lower.

Level Of Evidence: II-Diagnostic study.

Citing Articles

Standardizing 3 Dimensional Measurements in Foot and Ankle Imaging: A Contemporary Review and Methodological Proposal.

Kruger K, Lenz A, Dibbern K, de Cesar Netto C, Ledoux W, Thorhauer E Foot Ankle Clin. 2025; 30(1):221-237.

PMID: 39894616 PMC: 11788574. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2024.08.006.

Increased subtalar rotational motion in patients with symptomatic ankle instability under load and stress conditions.

Fernandez-Marin M, Gonzalez-Martin D, Herrera-Perez M, Paulano-Godino F, Vila-Rico J, Tejero S Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023; 31(11):5214-5221.

PMID: 37770749 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07553-2.

References

Frigg A, Nigg B, Hinz L, Valderrabano V, Russell I . Clinical relevance of hindfoot alignment view in total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2010; 31(10):871-9. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0871. View

Saltzman C, El-Khoury G . The hindfoot alignment view. Foot Ankle Int. 1995; 16(9):572-6. DOI: 10.1177/107110079501600911. View

Arunakul M, Amendola A, Gao Y, Goetz J, Femino J, Phisitkul P . Tripod index: a new radiographic parameter assessing foot alignment. Foot Ankle Int. 2013; 34(10):1411-20. DOI: 10.1177/1071100713488761. View

Lintz F, Barton T, Millet M, Harries W, Hepple S, Winson I . Ground Reaction Force Calcaneal Offset: A new measurement of hindfoot alignment. Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 18(1):9-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2011.01.003. View

Baverel L, Brilhault J, Odri G, Boissard M, Lintz F . Influence of lower limb rotation on hindfoot alignment using a conventional two-dimensional radiographic technique. Foot Ankle Surg. 2017; 23(1):44-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.02.003. View

Reilingh M, Beimers L, Tuijthof G, Stufkens S, Maas M, van Dijk C . Measuring hindfoot alignment radiographically: the long axial view is more reliable than the hindfoot alignment view. Skeletal Radiol. 2010; 39(11):1103-8. PMC: 2939352. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-009-0857-9. View

Lintz F, Welck M, Bernasconi A, Thornton J, Cullen N, Singh D . 3D Biometrics for Hindfoot Alignment Using Weightbearing CT. Foot Ankle Int. 2017; 38(6):684-689. DOI: 10.1177/1071100717690806. View

Zhang J, Lintz F, Bernasconi A, Zhang S . 3D Biometrics for Hindfoot Alignment Using Weightbearing Computed Tomography. Foot Ankle Int. 2019; 40(6):720-726. DOI: 10.1177/1071100719835492. View

10.

Lintz F, Mast J, Bernasconi A, Mehdi N, de Cesar Netto C, Fernando C . 3D, Weightbearing Topographical Study of Periprosthetic Cysts and Alignment in Total Ankle Replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2019; 41(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1177/1071100719891411. View

11.

Bernasconi A, Cooper L, Lyle S, Patel S, Cullen N, Singh D . Pes cavovarus in Charcot-Marie-Tooth compared to the idiopathic cavovarus foot: A preliminary weightbearing CT analysis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2020; 27(2):186-195. DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2020.04.004. View

12.

Saito G, Roney A, Day J, Greditzer H, Sofka C, Richter M . Combined weightbearing CT and MRI assessment of flexible progressive collapsing foot deformity. Foot Ankle Surg. 2020; 27(8):884-891. DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2020.12.003. View

13.

Myerson M, Thordarson D, Johnson J, Hintermann B, Sangeorzan B, Deland J . Classification and Nomenclature: Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2020; 41(10):1271-1276. DOI: 10.1177/1071100720950722. View

14.

Day J, Principe P, Caolo K, Fragomen A, Rozbruch S, Ellis S . A Staged Approach to Combined Extra-articular Limb Deformity Correction and Total Ankle Arthroplasty for End-Stage Ankle Arthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 2020; 42(3):257-267. DOI: 10.1177/1071100720965120. View

15.

de Cesar Netto C, Bernasconi A, Roberts L, Pontin P, Lintz F, Saito G . Foot Alignment in Symptomatic National Basketball Association Players Using Weightbearing Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019; 7(2):2325967119826081. PMC: 6385333. DOI: 10.1177/2325967119826081. View

16.

Rojas E, Mansur N, Dibbern K, Lalevee M, Auch E, Schmidt E . Weightbearing Computed Tomography for Assessment of Foot and Ankle Deformities: The Iowa Experience. Iowa Orthop J. 2021; 41(1):111-119. PMC: 8259196. View

17.

Burssens A, Van Herzele E, Leenders T, Clockaerts S, Buedts K, Vandeputte G . Weightbearing CT in normal hindfoot alignment - Presence of a constitutional valgus?. Foot Ankle Surg. 2018; 24(3):213-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.02.006. View

18.

Bernasconi A, Cooper L, Lyle S, Patel S, Cullen N, Singh D . Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of cone beam weightbearing semi-automatic three-dimensional measurements in symptomatic pes cavovarus. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019; 26(5):564-572. DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2019.07.005. View

19.

Dagneaux L, Dufrenot M, Bernasconi A, Bedard N, de Cesar Netto C, Lintz F . Three-Dimensional Biometrics to Correlate Hindfoot and Knee Coronal Alignments Using Modern Weightbearing Imaging. Foot Ankle Int. 2020; 41(11):1411-1418. DOI: 10.1177/1071100720938333. View

20.

Van Bergeyk A, Younger A, Carson B . CT analysis of hindfoot alignment in chronic lateral ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int. 2002; 23(1):37-42. DOI: 10.1177/107110070202300107. View