» Articles » PMID: 35445703

Electromechanical Reciprocity and Arrhythmogenesis in Long-QT Syndrome and Beyond

Overview
Journal Eur Heart J
Date 2022 Apr 21
PMID 35445703
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An abundance of literature describes physiological and pathological determinants of cardiac performance, building on the principles of excitation-contraction coupling. However, the mutual influencing of excitation-contraction and mechano-electrical feedback in the beating heart, here designated 'electromechanical reciprocity', remains poorly recognized clinically, despite the awareness that external and cardiac-internal mechanical stimuli can trigger electrical responses and arrhythmia. This review focuses on electromechanical reciprocity in the long-QT syndrome (LQTS), historically considered a purely electrical disease, but now appreciated as paradigmatic for the understanding of mechano-electrical contributions to arrhythmogenesis in this and other cardiac conditions. Electromechanical dispersion in LQTS is characterized by heterogeneously prolonged ventricular repolarization, besides altered contraction duration and relaxation. Mechanical alterations may deviate from what would be expected from global and regional repolarization abnormalities. Pathological repolarization prolongation outlasts mechanical systole in patients with LQTS, yielding a negative electromechanical window (EMW), which is most pronounced in symptomatic patients. The electromechanical window is a superior and independent arrhythmia-risk predictor compared with the heart rate-corrected QT. A negative EMW implies that the ventricle is deformed-by volume loading during the rapid filling phase-when repolarization is still ongoing. This creates a 'sensitized' electromechanical substrate, in which inadvertent electrical or mechanical stimuli such as local after-depolarizations, after-contractions, or dyssynchrony can trigger abnormal impulses. Increased sympathetic-nerve activity and pause-dependent potentiation further exaggerate electromechanical heterogeneities, promoting arrhythmogenesis. Unraveling electromechanical reciprocity advances the understanding of arrhythmia formation in various conditions. Real-time image integration of cardiac electrophysiology and mechanics offers new opportunities to address challenges in arrhythmia management.

Citing Articles

Simultaneous assessment of mechanical and electrical function in Langendorff-perfused mouse hearts.

Louradour J, Ottersberg R, Segiser A, Olejnik A, Martinez-Salazar B, Siegrist M Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1293032.

PMID: 38028448 PMC: 10663365. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1293032.


25 years of basic and translational science in EP Europace: novel insights into arrhythmia mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.

Remme C, Heijman J, Gomez A, Zaza A, Odening K Europace. 2023; 25(8).

PMID: 37622575 PMC: 10450791. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad210.


[Sudden cardiac death after cardioversion].

Bertram F, Buchholz J Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2023; 34(2):165-168.

PMID: 37027044 DOI: 10.1007/s00399-023-00935-6.


Effects of dexmedetomidine on cardiac electrophysiology in patients undergoing general anesthesia during perioperative period: a randomized controlled trial.

Tan C, Yan S, Shen J, Wu H, Yu L, Wang Y BMC Anesthesiol. 2022; 22(1):271.

PMID: 36008759 PMC: 9404616. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01811-5.

References
1.
Ravelli F . Mechano-electric feedback and atrial fibrillation. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2003; 82(1-3):137-49. DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6107(03)00011-7. View

2.
Abdelsayed M, Bytyci I, Rydberg A, Henein M . Left Ventricular Contraction Duration Is the Most Powerful Predictor of Cardiac Events in LQTS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2020; 9(9). PMC: 7565502. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9092820. View

3.
Vandersickel N, Bossu A, De Neve J, Dunnink A, Meijborg V, van der Heyden M . Short-Lasting Episodes of Torsade de Pointes in the Chronic Atrioventricular Block Dog Model Have a Focal Mechanism, While Longer-Lasting Episodes Are Maintained by Re-Entry. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018; 3(13):1565-1576. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.06.016. View

4.
Li W, Gurev V, McCulloch A, Trayanova N . The role of mechanoelectric feedback in vulnerability to electric shock. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2008; 97(2-3):461-78. PMC: 2517254. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2008.02.020. View

5.
Cranefield P, Klein H, Hoffman B . Conduction of the cardiac impulse. 1. Delay, block, and one-way block in depressed Purkinje fibers. Circ Res. 1971; 28(2):199-219. DOI: 10.1161/01.res.28.2.199. View