» Articles » PMID: 35442966

Social Reputation Influences on Liking and Willingness-to-pay for Artworks: A Multimethod Design Investigating Choice Behavior Along with Physiological Measures and Motivational Factors

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Apr 20
PMID 35442966
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Art, as a prestigious cultural commodity, concerns aesthetic and monetary values, personal tastes, and social reputation in various social contexts-all of which are reflected in choices concerning our liking, or in other contexts, our actual willingness-to-pay for artworks. But, how do these different aspects interact in regard to the concept of social reputation and our private versus social selves, which appear to be essentially intervening, and potentially conflicting, factors driving choice? In our study, we investigated liking and willingness-to-pay choices using-in art research-a novel, forced-choice paradigm. Participants (N = 123) made choices from artwork-triplets presented with opposing artistic quality and monetary value-labeling, thereby creating ambiguous choice situations. Choices were made in either private or in social/public contexts, in which participants were made to believe that either art-pricing or art-making experts were watching their selections. A multi-method design with eye-tracking, neuroendocrinology (testosterone, cortisol), and motivational factors complemented the behavioral choice analysis. Results showed that artworks, of which participants were told were of high artistic value were more often liked and those of high monetary-value received more willingness-to-pay choices. However, while willingness-to-pay was significantly affected by the presumed observation of art-pricing experts, liking selections did not differ between private/public contexts. Liking choices, compared to willingness-to-pay, were also better predicted by eye movement patterns. Whereas, hormone levels had a stronger relation with monetary aspects (willingness-to-pay/ art-pricing expert). This was further confirmed by motivational factors representative for reputation seeking behavior. Our study points to an unexplored terrain highlighting the linkage of social reputation mechanisms and its impact on choice behavior with a ubiquitous commodity, art.

Citing Articles

Using machine learning to predict judgments on Western visual art along content-representational and formal-perceptual attributes.

Spee B, Leder H, Mikuni J, Scharnowski F, Pelowski M, Steyrl D PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0304285.

PMID: 39241039 PMC: 11379394. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304285.


The dynamics of experiencing Gestalt and Aha in cubist art: pupil responses and art evaluations show a complex interplay of task, stimuli content, and time course.

Spee B, Arato J, Mikuni J, Tran U, Pelowski M, Leder H Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1192565.

PMID: 38544509 PMC: 10966367. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1192565.


Metaphors or mechanism? Predictive coding and a (brief) history of empirical study of the arts.

Leder H, Pelowski M Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 379(1895):20220427.

PMID: 38104611 PMC: 10725760. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0427.


Bias against AI art can enhance perceptions of human creativity.

Horton Jr C, White M, Iyengar S Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):19001.

PMID: 37923764 PMC: 10624838. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45202-3.


Art and Perception: Using Empirical Aesthetics in Research on Consciousness.

Ansorge U, Pelowski M, Quigley C, Peschl M, Leder H Front Psychol. 2022; 13:895985.

PMID: 35756216 PMC: 9222703. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.895985.

References
1.
Kirk U, Skov M, Hulme O, Christensen M, Zeki S . Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2008; 44(3):1125-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.009. View

2.
Eisenegger C, Haushofer J, Fehr E . The role of testosterone in social interaction. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011; 15(6):263-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.008. View

3.
Leder H, Nadal M . Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments : The aesthetic episode - Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. Br J Psychol. 2014; 105(4):443-64. DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12084. View

4.
Belke B, Leder H, Harsanyi G, Carbon C . When a Picasso is a "Picasso": the entry point in the identification of visual art. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009; 133(2):191-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.11.007. View

5.
Berns G, Capra C, Moore S, Noussair C . Neural mechanisms of the influence of popularity on adolescent ratings of music. Neuroimage. 2009; 49(3):2687-96. PMC: 2818406. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.070. View