» Articles » PMID: 35441120

The Prediction Model Using Thyroid-stimulating Immunoglobulin Bioassay For Relapse of Graves' Disease

Overview
Journal J Endocr Soc
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2022 Apr 20
PMID 35441120
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) bioassay has a better ability to predict the relapse rate of Graves' disease (GD) than the thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)-binding inhibitory immunoglobulin method in terms of measuring the TSH receptor antibody. However, the optimal TSI bioassay cutoff for predicting relapse after antithyroid drug (ATD) withdrawal is not well evaluated.

Methods: This retrospective study enrolled GD patients who had been treated with ATD and obtained their TSI bioassay <140% from January 2010 to December 2019 in a referral hospital.

Results: Among 219 study subjects, 86 patients (39.3%) experienced relapse. The TSI bioassay value of 66.5% significantly predicted the relapse of GD ( = 0.049). The group with a TSI bioassay value > 66.5% were expected to show a 23.8% relapse rate at 2 from ATD withdrawal, and the group with a TSI < 66.5% had a 12.7% relapse rate based on Kaplan-Meier curves analysis. The TSI bioassay showed a good ability to predict relapse GD in the female group ( = 0.041) but did not in the male group ( = 0.573). The risk scoring based on the nomogram with risk factors for GD relapse, which was constructed to overcome the limitation, increased the predictive ability of GD relapse by 11.5% compared to the use of the TSI bioassay alone.

Conclusions: The cutoff value of the TSI bioassay to predict GD relapse should be lower than that for diagnosing GD. However, as the single use of the TSI bioassay has limitations, a nomogram with multiple risk factors including TSI bioassay could be helpful to predict GD relapse.

Citing Articles

Comparison between thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin and TSH-receptor antibodies in the diagnosis and management of Graves' disease.

Yao P, Xie Y, Wang Y, Liang C, Huang B Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1487490.

PMID: 39669491 PMC: 11634614. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1487490.


Dynamic Risk Model for the Medical Treatment of Graves' Hyperthyroidism according to Treatment Duration.

Jin M, Kim C, Jeon M, Kim W, Kim T, Kim W Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2024; 39(4):579-589.

PMID: 38778479 PMC: 11375307. DOI: 10.3803/EnM.2024.1918.


The Early Changes in Thyroid-Stimulating Immunoglobulin Bioassay over Anti-Thyroid Drug Treatment Could Predict Prognosis of Graves' Disease.

Yu J, Baek H, Jeong C, Jo K, Lee J, Ha J Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2023; 38(3):338-346.

PMID: 37291744 PMC: 10323158. DOI: 10.3803/EnM.2023.1664.

References
1.
Bano A, Gan E, Addison C, Narayanan K, Weaver J, Tsatlidis V . Age May Influence the Impact of TRAbs on Thyroid Function and Relapse-Risk in Patients With Graves Disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018; 104(5):1378-1385. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2018-01738. View

2.
Balachandran V, Gonen M, Smith J, DeMatteo R . Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16(4):e173-80. PMC: 4465353. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71116-7. View

3.
Diana T, Wuster C, Kanitz M, Kahaly G . Highly variable sensitivity of five binding and two bio-assays for TSH-receptor antibodies. J Endocrinol Invest. 2016; 39(10):1159-65. DOI: 10.1007/s40618-016-0478-9. View

4.
Kahaly G . Management of Graves Thyroidal and Extrathyroidal Disease: An Update. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020; 105(12). PMC: 7543578. DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa646. View

5.
Li Y, Kim J, Diana T, Klasen R, Olivo P, Kahaly G . A novel bioassay for anti-thyrotrophin receptor autoantibodies detects both thyroid-blocking and stimulating activity. Clin Exp Immunol. 2013; 173(3):390-7. PMC: 3949626. DOI: 10.1111/cei.12129. View