Differences in Backward and Forward Treadmill Locomotion in Decerebrated Cats

Overview

Journal J Exp Biol

Specialty Biology

Date 2022 Apr 19

PMID 35438747

Authors

Natalia Merkulyeva

Vsevolod Lyakhovetskii

Oleg Gorskii

Pavel Musienko

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Locomotion in different directions is vital for animal life and requires fine-adjusted neural activity of spinal networks. To compare the levels of recruitability of the locomotor circuitry responsible for forward and backward stepping, several electromyographic and kinematic characteristics of the two locomotor modes were analysed in decerebrated cats. Electrical epidural spinal cord stimulation was used to evoke forward and backward locomotion on a treadmill belt. The functional state of the bilateral spinal networks was tuned by symmetrical and asymmetrical epidural stimulation. A significant deficit in the backward but not forward stepping was observed when laterally shifted epidural stimulation was used but was not observed with central stimulation: only half of the cats were able to perform bilateral stepping, but all the cats performed forward stepping. This difference was in accordance with the features of stepping during central epidural stimulation. Both the recruitability and stability of the EMG signals as well as inter-limb coordination during backward stepping were significantly decreased compared with those during forward stepping. The possible underlying neural mechanisms of the obtained functional differences of backward and forward locomotion (spinal network organisation, commissural communication and supraspinal influence) are discussed.

References

Mahaki M, de Sa E Souza G, Mimar R, Vieira M . The comparison of ground reaction forces and lower limb muscles correlation and activation time delay between forward and backward walking. Gait Posture. 2017; 58:380-385. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.08.039. View

Perell K, Gregor R, Buford J, Smith J . Adaptive control for backward quadrupedal walking. IV. Hindlimb kinetics during stance and swing. J Neurophysiol. 1993; 70(6):2226-40. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1993.70.6.2226. View

Courtine G, Gerasimenko Y, van den Brand R, Yew A, Musienko P, Zhong H . Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input. Nat Neurosci. 2009; 12(10):1333-42. PMC: 2828944. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2401. View

Musienko P, Bogacheva I, Gerasimenko Y . Significance of peripheral feedback in the generation of stepping movements during epidural stimulation of the spinal cord. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2006; 37(2):181-90. DOI: 10.1007/s11055-007-0166-5. View

Flynn T . Mechanical power and muscle action during forward and backward running. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993; 17(2):108-12. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1993.17.2.108. View

Kim S, Ryu Y, Je H, Jeong J, Kim H . Backward walking treadmill therapy can improve walking ability in children with spastic cerebral palsy: a pilot study. Int J Rehabil Res. 2013; 36(3):246-52. DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e32835dd620. View

van Deursen RW , Flynn , McCrory , Morag . Does a single control mechanism exist for both forward and backward walking?. Gait Posture. 1999; 7(3):214-224. DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(98)00007-1. View

Hoffer J, Loeb G, Sugano N, Marks W, ODonovan M, Pratt C . Cat hindlimb motoneurons during locomotion. III. Functional segregation in sartorius. J Neurophysiol. 1987; 57(2):554-62. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1987.57.2.554. View

Buford J, Smith J . Adaptive control for backward quadrupedal walking. II. Hindlimb muscle synergies. J Neurophysiol. 1990; 64(3):756-66. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1990.64.3.756. View

10.

Hoogkamer W, Meyns P, Duysens J . Steps forward in understanding backward gait: from basic circuits to rehabilitation. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2013; 42(1):23-9. DOI: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000000. View

11.

Winter D, Pluck N, Yang J . Backward walking: a simple reversal of forward walking?. J Mot Behav. 1989; 21(3):291-305. DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1989.10735483. View

12.

Choi J, Bastian A . Adaptation reveals independent control networks for human walking. Nat Neurosci. 2007; 10(8):1055-62. DOI: 10.1038/nn1930. View

13.

English A, Weeks O . An anatomical and functional analysis of cat biceps femoris and semitendinosus muscles. J Morphol. 1987; 191(2):161-75. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1051910207. View

14.

Chanaud C, Macpherson J . Functionally complex muscles of the cat hindlimb. III. Differential activation within biceps femoris during postural perturbations. Exp Brain Res. 1991; 85(2):271-80. DOI: 10.1007/BF00229406. View

15.

Grasso R, Ivanenko Y, Zago M, Molinari M, Scivoletto G, Lacquaniti F . Recovery of forward stepping in spinal cord injured patients does not transfer to untrained backward stepping. Exp Brain Res. 2004; 157(3):377-82. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1973-3. View

16.

Merkulyeva N, Lyakhovetskii V, Veshchitskii A, Gorskii O, Musienko P . Rostrocaudal Distribution of the C-Fos-Immunopositive Spinal Network Defined by Muscle Activity during Locomotion. Brain Sci. 2021; 11(1). PMC: 7825657. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11010069. View

17.

Lyakhovetskii V, Merkulyeva N, Gorskii O, Musienko P . Simultaneous bidirectional hindlimb locomotion in decerebrate cats. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):3252. PMC: 7865075. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82722-2. View

18.

Buford J, Zernicke R, Smith J . Adaptive control for backward quadrupedal walking. I. Posture and hindlimb kinematics. J Neurophysiol. 1990; 64(3):745-55. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1990.64.3.745. View

19.

Kato M . Chronically isolated lumbar half spinal cord generates locomotor activities in the ipsilateral hindlimb of the cat. Neurosci Res. 1990; 9(1):22-34. DOI: 10.1016/0168-0102(90)90042-d. View

20.

Gerasimenko Y, Avelev V, Nikitin O, Lavrov I . Initiation of locomotor activity in spinal cats by epidural stimulation of the spinal cord. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2003; 33(3):247-54. DOI: 10.1023/a:1022199214515. View