» Articles » PMID: 35438648

Barriers to Telemedicine Video Visits for Older Adults in Independent Living Facilities: Mixed Methods Cross-sectional Needs Assessment

Overview
Journal JMIR Aging
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2022 Apr 19
PMID 35438648
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Despite the increasing availability of telemedicine video visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, older adults have greater challenges in getting care through telemedicine.

Objective: We aim to better understand the barriers to telemedicine in community-dwelling older adults to improve the access to and experience of virtual visits.

Methods: We conducted a mixed methods needs assessment of older adults at two independent living facilities (sites A and B) in Northern California between September 2020 and March 2021. Voluntary surveys were distributed. Semistructured interviews were then conducted with participants who provided contact information. Surveys ascertained participants' preferred devices as well as comfort level, support, and top barriers regarding telephonic and video visits. Qualitative analysis of transcribed interviews identified key themes.

Results: Survey respondents' (N=249) average age was 84.6 (SD 6.6) years, and 76.7% (n=191) of the participants were female. At site A, 88.9% (111/125) had a bachelor's degree or beyond, and 99.2% (124/125) listed English as their preferred language. At site B, 42.9% (51/119) had a bachelor's degree or beyond, and 13.4% (16/119) preferred English, while 73.1% (87/119) preferred Mandarin. Regarding video visits, 36.5% (91/249) of all participants felt comfortable connecting with their health care team through video visits. Regarding top barriers, participants at site A reported not knowing how to connect to the platform (30/125, 24%), not being familiar with the technology (28/125, 22.4%), and having difficulty hearing (19/125, 15.2%), whereas for site B, the top barriers were not being able to speak English well (65/119, 54.6%), lack of familiarity with technology and the internet (44/119, 36.9%), and lack of interest in seeing providers outside of the clinic (42/119, 35.3%). Three key themes emerged from the follow-up interviews (n=15): (1) the perceived limitations of video visits, (2) the overwhelming process of learning the technology for telemedicine, and (3) the desire for in-person or on-demand help with telemedicine.

Conclusions: Substantial barriers exist for older adults in connecting with their health care team through telemedicine, particularly through video visits. The largest barriers include difficulty with technology or using the video visit platform, hearing difficulty, language barriers, and lack of desire to see providers virtually. Efforts to improve telemedicine access for older adults should take into account patient perspectives.

Citing Articles

Experiences of Telehealth Reimbursement Policies in Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Porteny T, Brophy S, Burroughs E JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(2):e2459554.

PMID: 39937474 PMC: 11822543. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.59554.


Empowering recovery: a remote spirometry system and mobile app for monitoring and promoting pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with rib fracture.

Liao C, Young T, Kuo L, Fu C, Chen S, Tee Y Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025; 10(1):e001309.

PMID: 39931205 PMC: 11808876. DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001309.


Remote monitoring of patients with COPD disease using a tablet system: a randomised crossover study of quality-of-life measurements.

Frerichs M, Li H, Andersson A, Andelid K, Crona M, Vanfleteren L ERJ Open Res. 2025; 11(1.

PMID: 39811558 PMC: 11726541. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00532-2024.


Telehealth Usability Among Rural and Low-Income Populations: A Survey of Wyoming Medicaid Members.

Homer R, Biller S, Schumaker B, Johnson P J Patient Exp. 2024; 11:23743735241309442.

PMID: 39734645 PMC: 11672495. DOI: 10.1177/23743735241309442.


Benefits and drawbacks of videoconferencing in eldercare from care workers' perspectives.

Mustola V, Oinas T, Leinonen E, Taipale S Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241297225.

PMID: 39649293 PMC: 11622303. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241297225.


References
1.
Batsis J, DiMilia P, Seo L, Fortuna K, Kennedy M, Blunt H . Effectiveness of Ambulatory Telemedicine Care in Older Adults: A Systematic Review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019; 67(8):1737-1749. PMC: 6684409. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15959. View

2.
Bashshur R, Doarn C, Frenk J, Kvedar J, Woolliscroft J . Telemedicine and the COVID-19 Pandemic, Lessons for the Future. Telemed J E Health. 2020; 26(5):571-573. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2020.29040.rb. View

3.
Zulfiqar A, Hajjam A, Andres E . Focus on the Different Projects of Telemedicine Centered on the Elderly In France. Curr Aging Sci. 2019; 11(4):202-215. PMC: 6635422. DOI: 10.2174/1874609812666190304115426. View

4.
Contreras C, Metzger G, Beane J, Dedhia P, Ejaz A, Pawlik T . Telemedicine: Patient-Provider Clinical Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020; 24(7):1692-1697. PMC: 7206900. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04623-5. View

5.
Tuckson R, Edmunds M, Hodgkins M . Telehealth. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(16):1585-1592. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsr1503323. View