Casting Without Reduction Versus Closed Reduction With or Without Fixation in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Children: Protocol for a Randomized Noninferiority Trial

Overview

Journal JMIR Res Protoc

Publisher JMIR Publications

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2022 Apr 18

PMID 35436224

Authors

Maria Fernanda Garcia-Rueda

Adriana Patricia Bohorquez-Penaranda

Jacky Fabian Armando Gil-Laverde

Francisco Javier Aguilar-Sierra

Camilo Mendoza-Pulido

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Acute treatment for distal radius fractures, the most frequent fractures in the pediatric population, represents a challenge to the orthopedic surgeon. Deciding on surgical restoration of the alignment or cast immobilization without reducing the fracture is a complex concern given the remodeling potential of bones in children. In addition, the lack of evidence-based safe boundaries of shortening and angulation, that will not jeopardize upper-extremity functionality in the future, further complicates this decision.

Objective: The authors aim to measure functional outcomes, assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Physical Function v2.0 instrument. The authors hypothesize that outcomes will not be worse in children treated with cast immobilization in situ compared with those treated with closed reduction with or without percutaneous fixation. The authors also aim to compare the following as secondary outcomes: ulnar variance and fracture alignment in the sagittal and coronal planes, range of motion, pressure ulcers, pain control, radius osteotomy due to deformity, pseudoarthrosis cure, and remanipulation.

Methods: This is the protocol of a randomized noninferiority trial comparing upper-extremity functionality in children aged 5 to 10 years, after sustaining a distal radius fracture, treated with either cast immobilization in situ or closed reduction with or without fixation in a single orthopedic hospital. Functional follow-up is projected at 6 months, while clinical and radiographic follow-up will occur at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 9 months.

Results: Recruitment commenced in July 2021. As of January 2022, 23 children have been randomized. Authors expect an average of 5 patients to be recruited monthly; therefore, recruitment and analysis should be complete by October 2024.

Conclusions: This experimental design that addresses upper-extremity functionality after cast immobilization in situ in children who have sustained a distal fracture of the radius may yield compelling information that could aid the clinician in deciding on the most suitable orthopedic treatment.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05008029; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05008029.

International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/34576.

Citing Articles

Distal radius fractures in children aged 5-12 years: a Swedish nationwide register-based study of 25 777 patients.

Bergkvist A, Lundqvist E, Pantzar-Castilla E BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1):560.

PMID: 37430230 PMC: 10332051. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06680-8.

References

Nishiwaki M, Welsh M, Gammon B, Ferreira L, Johnson J, King G . Effect of Volarly Angulated Distal Radius Fractures on Forearm Rotation and Distal Radioulnar Joint Kinematics. J Hand Surg Am. 2015; 40(11):2236-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.07.034. View

Williams K, Smith G, Luhmann S, Mao J, Gunn 3rd J, Luhmann J . A randomized controlled trial of cast versus splint for distal radial buckle fracture: an evaluation of satisfaction, convenience, and preference. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013; 29(5):555-9. DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31828e56fb. View

Zhao W, Weng Y, Wu Q, Palesch Y . Quantitative comparison of randomization designs in sequential clinical trials based on treatment balance and allocation randomness. Pharm Stat. 2011; 11(1):39-48. PMC: 3399213. DOI: 10.1002/pst.493. View

Gerull W, Okoroafor U, Guattery J, Goldfarb C, Wall L, Calfee R . Performance of Pediatric PROMIS CATs in Children With Upper Extremity Fractures. Hand (N Y). 2018; 15(2):194-200. PMC: 7076605. DOI: 10.1177/1558944718793195. View

Ploegmakers J, Verheyen C . Acceptance of angulation in the non-operative treatment of paediatric forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2006; 15(6):428-32. DOI: 10.1097/01.bpb.0000210594.81393.fe. View

Gibbons C, Woods D, Pailthorpe C, Carr A, Worlock P . The management of isolated distal radius fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994; 14(2):207-10. DOI: 10.1097/01241398-199403000-00014. View

MacDermid J, Turgeon T, Richards R, Beadle M, Roth J . Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma. 1998; 12(8):577-86. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199811000-00009. View

Do T, Strub W, Foad S, Mehlman C, Crawford A . Reduction versus remodeling in pediatric distal forearm fractures: a preliminary cost analysis. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2003; 12(2):109-15. DOI: 10.1097/01.bpb.0000043725.21564.7b. View

Christoffersen T, Ahmed L, Winther A, Nilsen O, Furberg A, Grimnes G . Fracture incidence rates in Norwegian children, The Tromsø Study, Fit Futures. Arch Osteoporos. 2016; 11(1):40. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-016-0294-z. View

10.

Ramoutar D, Shivji F, Rodrigues J, Hunter J . The outcomes of displaced paediatric distal radius fractures treated with percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation: a review of 248 cases. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014; 25(3):471-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-014-1553-6. View

11.

Mamoowala N, Johnson N, Dias J . Trends in paediatric distal radius fractures: an eight-year review from a large UK trauma unit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019; 101(4):297-303. PMC: 6432966. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0023. View

12.

Mader K, Gausepohl T, Pennig D . Shortening and deformity of radius and ulna in children: correction of axis and length by callus distraction. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2003; 12(3):183-91. DOI: 10.1097/01.bpb.0000057485.91570.e9. View

13.

Khosla S, Melton 3rd L, Dekutoski M, Achenbach S, Oberg A, Riggs B . Incidence of childhood distal forearm fractures over 30 years: a population-based study. JAMA. 2003; 290(11):1479-85. DOI: 10.1001/jama.290.11.1479. View

14.

Audige L, Slongo T, Lutz N, Blumenthal A, Joeris A . The AO Pediatric Comprehensive Classification of Long Bone Fractures (PCCF). Acta Orthop. 2016; 88(2):133-139. PMC: 5385106. DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1258534. View

15.

Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Andersson B, Dahlgren E, Johansson A . The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001; 71(6):613-8. DOI: 10.1080/000164700317362262 . View

16.

McLauchlan G, Cowan B, Annan I, Robb J . Management of completely displaced metaphyseal fractures of the distal radius in children. A prospective, randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84(3):413-7. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b3.11432. View

17.

Edsberg L, Black J, Goldberg M, McNichol L, Moore L, Sieggreen M . Revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Staging System: Revised Pressure Injury Staging System. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2016; 43(6):585-597. PMC: 5098472. DOI: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000281. View

18.

Crawford S, Lee L, Izuka B . Closed treatment of overriding distal radial fractures without reduction in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(3):246-52. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00163. View

19.

Friberg K . Remodelling after distal forearm fractures in children. III. Correction of residual angulation in fractures of the radius. Acta Orthop Scand. 1979; 50(6 Pt 2):741-9. DOI: 10.3109/17453677908991304. View

20.

Handoll H, Elliott J, Iheozor-Ejiofor Z, Hunter J, Karantana A . Interventions for treating wrist fractures in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 12:CD012470. PMC: 6516962. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012470.pub2. View