» Articles » PMID: 35433816

Validity and Reliability of the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale-Chinese Version

Overview
Journal Front Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2022 Apr 18
PMID 35433816
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To test the validity and reliability of the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale-Chinese version in clinical nurses.

Methods: According to the translation principles of the Brislin Scale, the original scale was translated, back translated and cross-culturally adapted to form the Chinese version of the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale. Nurses in three general hospitals in Changsha, Hunan province were surveyed by convenient sampling method from July 2020 to September 2021. Exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, content validity and criterion validity was used to evaluate the validity of the scale. Internal consistency Cronbach's α coefficient, split-half reliability and test-retest reliability were used to evaluate the reliability of the scale.

Results: A total of 678 nurses were included in the study. There were 460 people in sample 1 and 218 people in sample 2. Two common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis. The cumulative contribution was 65.560%. The two-factor structure model was good (χ/df = 3.137, CFI = 0.928, IFI = 0.929, GFI = 0.842, TLI = 0.917, RMSEA = 0.099). The I-CVI of the scale was 0.8-1.0. The S-CVI/Ave was 0.94. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient is 0.956. The broken half reliability is 0.920. The retest reliability is 0.910.

Conclusion: This study identified two components of the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale-Chinese version, which has 2 dimensions and 17 items. With good validity and reliability, it is suitable for the assessment of secondary traumatic stress among clinical nurses in the Chinese context.

Citing Articles

The influence of childhood trauma on social media-induced secondary traumatic stress among college students: the chain mediating effect of self-compassion and resilience.

Liu X, Yao Y, Zhu S, Gong Q Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025; 16(1):2456322.

PMID: 39899394 PMC: 11792160. DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2456322.


Compassion fatigue, secondary traumatic stress, and coping strategies of mental health professionals.

Kumar K, Ponnuchamy L, Anand N, Ganjekar S, Majhi G, Prakash P Ind Psychiatry J. 2024; 33(Suppl 1):S52-S58.

PMID: 39534134 PMC: 11553590. DOI: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_63_24.

References
1.
Zakeri M, Bazmandegan G, Ganjeh H, Zakeri M, Mollaahmadi S, Anbariyan A . Is nurses' clinical competence associated with their compassion satisfaction, burnout and secondary traumatic stress? A cross-sectional study. Nurs Open. 2020; 8(1):354-363. PMC: 7729795. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.636. View

2.
Acquadro Maran D, Zito M, Colombo L . Secondary Traumatic Stress in Italian Police Officers: The Role of Job Demands and Job Resources. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:1435. PMC: 7333238. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01435. View

3.
Benuto L, Yang Y, Ahrendt A, Cummings C . The Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale: Confirmatory Factor Analyses With a National Sample of Victim Advocates. J Interpers Violence. 2018; 36(5-6):2572-2591. DOI: 10.1177/0886260518759657. View

4.
Lee H, Baek W, Lim A, Lee D, Pang Y, Kim O . Secondary traumatic stress and compassion satisfaction mediate the association between stress and burnout among Korean hospital nurses: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2021; 20(1):115. PMC: 8243298. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-021-00636-w. View

5.
Jacobs I, Charmillot M, Martin Soelch C, Horsch A . Validity, Reliability, and Factor Structure of the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale-French Version. Front Psychiatry. 2019; 10:191. PMC: 6474258. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00191. View