» Articles » PMID: 35433348

Distal Transradial Access for Coronary Procedures: a Prospective Cohort of 3,683 All-comers Patients from the DISTRACTION Registry

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Distal transradial access (dTRA) as an improvement of the traditional transradial approach has several potential advantages including operator and patient comfort, faster hemostasis, and lower risk of proximal radial artery occlusion (RAO). We aim to describe our real-world experience with dTRA as default approach for routine coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in a broad and prospective cohort of all-comers patients.

Methods: In the DISTRACTION registry, a total of 3,683 consecutive all-comers patients who underwent coronary procedures via dTRA were included.

Results: The mean patient age was 63.3±13.5-year-old, 66.1% were male, 39.7% had diabetes, and 50.2% presented with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Overall, 20% of patients had non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), 22.9% had ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and 2.6% presented in cardiogenic shock. There were 2.5% access site crossovers, 16% of those were performed via contralateral dTRA; thus, in only 77 (2.1%) patients dTRA sheath insertion could not be obtained. Right dTRA (rdTRA) was the most frequent access (80.2%), followed by redo ipsilateral dTRA (10.5%), left dTRA (ldTRA) (8.6%) and simultaneous bilateral dTRA (0.7%). PCI was performed in 60.4% of all cases, and left anterior descending was the most treated vessel (29%). No access site-related hematoma type ≥2, according to EASY classification was recorded. No hand/thumb dysfunction after any procedure was documented. One patient developed a pseudoaneurysm, and one had guidewire-induced forearm radial artery perforation. There were neither major complications nor major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events directly related to dTRA.

Conclusions: In this large, prospective, all-commers patients registry the adoption of dTRA as standard for routine coronary interventions appears to be safe and feasible.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and success rate of Distal Radial Artery Access at the Anatomical Snuffbox for Coronary Intervention at Central Chest Institute of Thailand.

Thongplung K, Kanaderm C, Witayanan J, Kanoksilp A, Chantadansuwan T BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025; 25(1):115.

PMID: 39972419 PMC: 11837435. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-025-04545-7.


Comparison of radial artery occlusion between traditional radial access and distal radial access for coronary angiography and intervention: A prospective cohort study.

Zahedmehr A, Dousti A, Alemzadeh-Ansari M, Gharibzadeh A, Sheibani M, MozafaryBazargany M Heliyon. 2024; 10(20):e39451.

PMID: 39502239 PMC: 11535977. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39451.


Prolonged Doppler US-guided pneumatic compression of a radial artery pseudoaneurysm after percutaneous coronary intervention: a simple and effective solution for a rare and challenging problem.

Oliveira M, Perillo P, Lemos L, Caixeta A J Vasc Bras. 2023; 22:e20210212.

PMID: 38076581 PMC: 10706008. DOI: 10.1590/1677-5449.202102122.


Preventing and Managing Radial Artery Occlusion following Transradial Procedures: Strategies and Considerations.

Tsigkas G, Papanikolaou A, Apostolos A, Kramvis A, Timpilis F, Latta A J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023; 10(7).

PMID: 37504539 PMC: 10380353. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10070283.


Analysis of the Effectiveness of Transradial Access Puncture in the Application of Complications and Comfort after Cerebral Angiography.

Wan H, Gao L, Huang D Emerg Med Int. 2022; 2022:3457034.

PMID: 36267143 PMC: 9578911. DOI: 10.1155/2022/3457034.

References
1.
Bernat I, Aminian A, Pancholy S, Mamas M, Gaudino M, Nolan J . Best Practices for the Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Diagnostic Angiography and Intervention: An International Consensus Paper. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 12(22):2235-2246. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.07.043. View

2.
Liang C, Han Q, Jia Y, Fan C, Qin G . Distal Transradial Access in Anatomical Snuffbox for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: An Updated Meta-Analysis. J Interv Cardiol. 2021; 2021:7099044. PMC: 8321763. DOI: 10.1155/2021/7099044. View

3.
Sgueglia G, Di Giorgio A, Gaspardone A, Babunashvili A . Anatomic Basis and Physiological Rationale of Distal Radial Artery Access for Percutaneous Coronary and Endovascular Procedures. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11(20):2113-2119. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.045. View

4.
Corcos T . Distal radial access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: A state-of-the-art review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 93(4):639-644. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28016. View

5.
Amato J, Solod E, Cleveland R . A "second" radial artery for monitoring the perioperative pediatric cardiac patient. J Pediatr Surg. 1977; 12(5):715-7. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3468(77)90399-2. View