» Articles » PMID: 35432688

JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL ANALYSIS OF BREAST CANCER HISTOLOGIC IMAGES AND GENOMIC COVARIATES

Overview
Journal Ann Appl Stat
Date 2022 Apr 18
PMID 35432688
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The two main approaches in the study of breast cancer are histopathology (analyzing visual characteristics of tumors) and genomics. While both histopathology and genomics are fundamental to cancer research, the connections between these fields have been relatively superficial. We bridge this gap by investigating the Carolina Breast Cancer Study through the development of an integrative, exploratory analysis framework. Our analysis gives insights - some known, some novel - that are engaging to both pathologists and geneticists. Our analysis framework is based on Angle-based Joint and Individual Variation Explained (AJIVE) for statistical data integration and exploits Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) as a powerful, automatic method for image feature extraction. CNNs raise interpretability issues that we address by developing novel methods to explore visual modes of variation captured by statistical algorithms (e.g. PCA or AJIVE) applied to CNN features.

Citing Articles

Image analysis-based identification of high risk ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancers.

Lee D, Li Y, Olsson L, Hamilton A, Calhoun B, Hoadley K Breast Cancer Res. 2024; 26(1):177.

PMID: 39633505 PMC: 11616316. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-024-01915-5.


Deep Learning Techniques with Genomic Data in Cancer Prognosis: A Comprehensive Review of the 2021-2023 Literature.

Lee M Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(7).

PMID: 37508326 PMC: 10376033. DOI: 10.3390/biology12070893.


Similarity-driven multi-view embeddings from high-dimensional biomedical data.

Avants B, Tustison N, Stone J Nat Comput Sci. 2021; 1(2):143-152.

PMID: 33796865 PMC: 8009088. DOI: 10.1038/s43588-021-00029-8.


Pathomic Fusion: An Integrated Framework for Fusing Histopathology and Genomic Features for Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis.

Chen R, Lu M, Wang J, Williamson D, Rodig S, Lindeman N IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020; 41(4):757-770.

PMID: 32881682 PMC: 10339462. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2020.3021387.

References
1.
Weigelt B, Geyer F, Horlings H, Kreike B, Halfwerk H, Reis-Filho J . Mucinous and neuroendocrine breast carcinomas are transcriptionally distinct from invasive ductal carcinomas of no special type. Mod Pathol. 2009; 22(11):1401-14. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2009.112. View

2.
Livasy C, Karaca G, Nanda R, Tretiakova M, Olopade O, Moore D . Phenotypic evaluation of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2005; 19(2):264-71. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800528. View

3.
Zack G, Rogers W, LATT S . Automatic measurement of sister chromatid exchange frequency. J Histochem Cytochem. 1977; 25(7):741-53. DOI: 10.1177/25.7.70454. View

4.
Bejnordi B, Mullooly M, Pfeiffer R, Fan S, Vacek P, Weaver D . Using deep convolutional neural networks to identify and classify tumor-associated stroma in diagnostic breast biopsies. Mod Pathol. 2018; 31(10):1502-1512. PMC: 6752036. DOI: 10.1038/s41379-018-0073-z. View

5.
Caldarella A, Buzzoni C, Crocetti E, Bianchi S, Vezzosi V, Apicella P . Invasive breast cancer: a significant correlation between histological types and molecular subgroups. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012; 139(4):617-23. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-012-1365-1. View