» Articles » PMID: 35431850

Multi-Granularity Analysis of Brain Networks Assembled With Intra-Frequency and Cross-Frequency Phase Coupling for Human EEG After Stroke

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Apr 18
PMID 35431850
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Evaluating the impact of stroke on the human brain based on electroencephalogram (EEG) remains a challenging problem. Previous studies are mainly analyzed within frequency bands. This article proposes a multi-granularity analysis framework, which uses multiple brain networks assembled with intra-frequency and cross-frequency phase-phase coupling to evaluate the stroke impact in temporal and spatial granularity. Through our experiments on the EEG data of 11 patients with left ischemic stroke and 11 healthy controls during the mental rotation task, we find that the brain information interaction is highly affected after stroke, especially in delta-related cross-frequency bands, such as delta-alpha, delta-low beta, and delta-high beta. Besides, the average phase synchronization index (PSI) of the right hemisphere between patients with stroke and controls has a significant difference, especially in delta-alpha ( = 0.0186 in the left-hand mental rotation task, = 0.0166 in the right-hand mental rotation task), which shows that the non-lesion hemisphere of patients with stroke is also affected while it cannot be observed in intra-frequency bands. The graph theory analysis of the entire task stage reveals that the brain network of patients with stroke has a longer feature path length and smaller clustering coefficient. Besides, in the graph theory analysis of three sub-stags, the more stable significant difference between the two groups is emerging in the mental rotation sub-stage (500-800 ms). These findings demonstrate that the coupling between different frequency bands brings a new perspective to understanding the brain's cognitive process after stroke.

Citing Articles

Time-frequency-space transformer EEG decoding for spinal cord injury.

Xu F, Liu M, Chen X, Yan Y, Zhao J, Liu Y Cogn Neurodyn. 2024; 18(6):3491-3506.

PMID: 39712087 PMC: 11656005. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-024-10135-8.

References
1.
Kawano T, Hattori N, Uno Y, Kitajo K, Hatakenaka M, Yagura H . Large-Scale Phase Synchrony Reflects Clinical Status After Stroke: An EEG Study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017; 31(6):561-570. DOI: 10.1177/1545968317697031. View

2.
Zeng H, Dai G, Kong W, Chen F, Wang L . A Novel Nonlinear Dynamic Method for Stroke Rehabilitation Effect Evaluation Using EEG. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017; 25(12):2488-2497. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2017.2744664. View

3.
Jacobs D, Hilton T, Del Campo M, Carlen P, Bardakjian B . Classification of Pre-Clinical Seizure States Using Scalp EEG Cross-Frequency Coupling Features. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018; 65(11):2440-2449. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2797919. View

4.
Jerbi K, Bertrand O . Cross-frequency coupling in parieto-frontal oscillatory networks during motor imagery revealed by magnetoencephalography. Front Neurosci. 2009; 3(1):3-4. PMC: 2695383. DOI: 10.3389/neuro.01.011.2009. View

5.
Cassidy J, Wodeyar A, Wu J, Kaur K, Masuda A, Srinivasan R . Low-Frequency Oscillations Are a Biomarker of Injury and Recovery After Stroke. Stroke. 2020; 51(5):1442-1450. PMC: 7188582. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.028932. View