Comparison of Halo and Compression Signs Assessed by a High Frequency Ultrasound Probe for the Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis

Overview

Journal J Ultrasound

Publisher Springer

Specialty Radiology

Date 2022 Apr 15

PMID 35426608

Authors

Steve Raoul Noumegni

Sandrine Jousse-Joulin

Clement Hoffmann

Divi Cornec

Valerie Devauchelle-Pensec

Alain Saraux

Luc Bressollette

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnosis performances of halo and compression signs alone and combined, assessed by a high frequency 22-MHz probe, and test their agreement in giant cell arteritis (GCA).

Methods: In this cross-sectional study on patients suspected with GCA, halo sign was defined as hypo or iso-echogenic circumferential aspect of the vessel wall in transverse or longitudinal view; and compression sign was defined as visibility of the vessel wall upon transducer-imposed compression of the artery. Agreement of the two signs was tested using the Cohen's kappa statistic.

Results: A total of 80 patients (50% women) were included with a mean age of 74.4 years. Twenty participants (25%) were ultimately treated for GCA. Halo and compression signs have respective prevalences of 35% and 48%, with respective sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 80% for the halo sign; and 85% and 65% for the compression sign. The kappa coefficient for the global agreement of the two signs was 0.67 (95% confident interval: 0.54-0.85). Combination of the two signs give a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 81.7%.

Conclusion: Halo and compression signs assessed by a high frequency probe, show a good level of agreement for the diagnosis of GCA and improve ultrasound specificity when combined together.

Citing Articles

[Imaging of large vessel vasculitis].

Casteleyn V, Schmidt W Z Rheumatol. 2023; 82(8):646-653.

PMID: 37620546 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-023-01405-7.

Imaging in diagnosis, monitoring and outcome prediction of large vessel vasculitis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis informing the 2023 update of the EULAR recommendations.

Bosch P, Bond M, Dejaco C, Ponte C, Mackie S, Falzon L RMD Open. 2023; 9(3).

PMID: 37620113 PMC: 10450079. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003379.

References

Waller A, Jawad A . CRP and ESR in giant cell arteritis. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2018; 47(3):303. DOI: 10.4997/JRCPE.2017.318. View

Monti S, Floris A, Ponte C, Schmidt W, Diamantopoulos A, Pereira C . The proposed role of ultrasound in the management of giant cell arteritis in routine clinical practice. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017; 57(1):112-119. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex341. View

Schmidt W, Kraft H, Volker L, Vorpahl K . Colour Doppler sonography to diagnose temporal arteritis. Lancet. 1995; 345(8953):866. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)93005-1. View

Soriano A, Muratore F, Pipitone N, Boiardi L, Cimino L, Salvarani C . Visual loss and other cranial ischaemic complications in giant cell arteritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017; 13(8):476-484. DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2017.98. View

Ehlers L, Askling J, Bijlsma H, Cid M, Cutolo M, Dasgupta B . 2018 EULAR recommendations for a core data set to support observational research and clinical care in giant cell arteritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019; 78(9):1160-1166. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214755. View

Landis J, Koch G . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33(1):159-74. View

Romera-Villegas A, Vila-Coll R, Poca-Dias V, Cairols-Castellote M . The role of color duplex sonography in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. J Ultrasound Med. 2004; 23(11):1493-8. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2004.23.11.1493. View

Dejaco C, Ramiro S, Duftner C, Besson F, Bley T, Blockmans D . EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in large vessel vasculitis in clinical practice. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018; 77(5):636-643. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212649. View

Luqmani R, Lee E, Singh S, Gillett M, Schmidt W, Bradburn M . The Role of Ultrasound Compared to Biopsy of Temporal Arteries in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis (TABUL): a diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness study. Health Technol Assess. 2016; 20(90):1-238. PMC: 5165283. DOI: 10.3310/hta20900. View

10.

Davies C, May D . The role of temporal artery biopsies in giant cell arteritis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011; 93(1):4-5. PMC: 3293260. DOI: 10.1308/003588411X12851639107476. View

11.

Schmidt W . Ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018; 57(suppl_2):ii22-ii31. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex461. View

12.

Noumegni S, Hoffmann C, Cornec D, Gestin S, Bressollette L, Jousse-Joulin S . Temporal Artery Ultrasound to Diagnose Giant Cell Arteritis: A Practical Guide. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020; 47(2):201-213. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.10.004. View

13.

Fernandez-Fernandez E, Monjo-Henry I, Bonilla G, Plasencia C, Miranda-Carus M, Balsa A . False positives in the ultrasound diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: some diseases can also show the halo sign. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020; 59(9):2443-2447. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez641. View

14.

Koster M, Warrington K . Giant cell arteritis: pathogenic mechanisms and new potential therapeutic targets. BMC Rheumatol. 2019; 1:2. PMC: 6383596. DOI: 10.1186/s41927-017-0004-5. View

15.

Aschwanden M, Daikeler T, Kesten F, Baldi T, Benz D, Tyndall A . Temporal artery compression sign--a novel ultrasound finding for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Ultraschall Med. 2012; 34(1):47-50. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1312821. View

16.

Arida A, Kyprianou M, Kanakis M, Sfikakis P . The diagnostic value of ultrasonography-derived edema of the temporal artery wall in giant cell arteritis: a second meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010; 11:44. PMC: 2837862. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-44. View

17.

Karassa F, Matsagas M, Schmidt W, Ioannidis J . Meta-analysis: test performance of ultrasonography for giant-cell arteritis. Ann Intern Med. 2005; 142(5):359-69. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-5-200503010-00011. View

18.

Chrysidis S, Duftner C, Dejaco C, Schafer V, Ramiro S, Carrara G . Definitions and reliability assessment of elementary ultrasound lesions in giant cell arteritis: a study from the OMERACT Large Vessel Vasculitis Ultrasound Working Group. RMD Open. 2018; 4(1):e000598. PMC: 5976098. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000598. View

19.

Hunder G, Bloch D, Michel B, STEVENS M, Arend W, Calabrese L . The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1990; 33(8):1122-8. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780330810. View

20.

Ball E, Walsh S, Tang T, Gohil R, Clarke J . Role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of temporal arteritis. Br J Surg. 2010; 97(12):1765-71. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7252. View