» Articles » PMID: 35421949

Addressing Chronic Pain with Focused Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Integrated Primary Care: Findings from a Mixed Methods Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Over 100 million Americans have chronic pain and most obtain their treatment in primary care clinics. However, evidence-based behavioral treatments targeting pain-related disability are not typically provided in these settings. Therefore, this study sought to: 1) evaluate implementation of a brief evidence-based treatment, Focused Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (FACT-CP), delivered by an integrated behavioral health consultant (BHC) in primary care; and 2) preliminarily explore primary (self-reported physical disability) and secondary treatment outcomes (chronic pain acceptance and engagement in valued activities).

Methods: This mixed-methods pilot randomized controlled trial included twenty-six participants with non-cancer chronic pain being treated in primary care (54% women; 46% Hispanic/Latino). Active participants completed a 30-min individual FACT-CP visit followed by 3 weekly 60-min group visits and a booster visit 2 months later. An enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU) control group received 4 handouts about pain management based in cognitive-behavioral science. Follow-up research visits occurred during and after treatment, at 12 weeks (booster visit), and at 6 months. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect qualitative data after the last research visit. General linear mixed regression models with repeated measures explored primary and secondary outcomes.

Results: The study design and FACT-CP intervention were feasible and acceptable. Quantitative analyses indicate at 6-month follow-up, self-reported physical disability significantly improved pre-post within the FACT-CP arm (d = 0.64); engagement in valued activities significantly improved within both the FACT-CP (d = 0.70) and ETAU arms (d = 0.51); and chronic pain acceptance was the only outcome significantly different between arms (d = 1.04), increased in the FACT-CP arm and decreased in the ETAU arm. Qualitative data analyses reflected that FACT-CP participants reported acquiring skills for learning to live with pain, consistent with increased chronic pain acceptance.

Conclusion: Findings support that FACT-CP was acceptable for patients with chronic pain and feasible for delivery in a primary care setting by a BHC. Results provide preliminary evidence for improved physical functioning after FACT-CP treatment. A larger pragmatic trial is warranted, with a design based on data gathered in this pilot.

Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04978961 (27/07/2021).

Citing Articles

An update on non-pharmacological interventions for pain relief.

Wang Y, Aaron R, Attal N, Colloca L Cell Rep Med. 2025; 6(2):101940.

PMID: 39970872 PMC: 11866493. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.101940.


Acceptance and commitment therapy for patients with chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis on psychological outcomes and quality of life.

Ye L, Li Y, Deng Q, Zhao X, Zhong L, Yang L PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0301226.

PMID: 38875241 PMC: 11178235. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301226.


The efficacy, acceptability and safety of acceptance and commitment therapy for fibromyalgia - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eastwood F, Godfrey E Br J Pain. 2024; 18(3):243-256.

PMID: 38751564 PMC: 11092929. DOI: 10.1177/20494637231221451.


A Single-Session Process-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention Combined with Multimodal Rehabilitation Treatment for Chronic Pain Associated with Emotional Disorders.

Cojocaru C, Popa C, Schenk A, Jakab Z, Suciu B, Olah P Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 38667123 PMC: 11047417. DOI: 10.3390/bs14040327.

References
1.
McCracken L, Vowles K, Eccleston C . Acceptance of chronic pain: component analysis and a revised assessment method. Pain. 2004; 107(1-2):159-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.10.012. View

2.
Hunter C, Funderburk J, Polaha J, Bauman D, Goodie J, Hunter C . Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) Model Research: Current State of the Science and a Call to Action. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2017; 25(2):127-156. DOI: 10.1007/s10880-017-9512-0. View

3.
Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios L . A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10:1. PMC: 2824145. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1. View

4.
Koho P, Aho S, Watson P, Hurri H . Assessment of chronic pain behaviour: reliability of the method and its relationship with perceived disability, physical impairment and function. J Rehabil Med. 2001; 33(3):128-32. DOI: 10.1080/165019701750165970. View

5.
Fairbank J, Couper J, Davies J, OBrien J . The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980; 66(8):271-3. View