» Articles » PMID: 35415533

Using the DASH to Model Clinical Recovery Trajectory After Operative Management of Distal Radius Fracture

Overview
Date 2022 Apr 13
PMID 35415533
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: There is a paucity of literature examining the trajectory of meaningful clinical improvement after distal radius fracture (DRF) fixation. We sought to answer the following questions: (1) When do patients meet the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in the -Disabilities in Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH) score change after DRF fixation? (2) What gains in terms of number of MCIDs achieved (as measured by DASH) do patients make as they recover from DRF fixation? (3) What patient and injury factors are characteristic of patients who meet or do not meet the average recovery trajectory?

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of an institutional database of DRF patients treated with operative fixation. The change in DASH scores from before surgery to approximate follow-up intervals of 0 to 2 months, 3 to 6 months, and a minimum of 9 of 12 months was assessed, in which a delta of 14 reflected the MCID. The change in DASH score from before surgery to each follow-up interval was divided by 14 to determine the number of MCIDs, representing appreciable clinical improvement. Patient characteristics were compared between those who did and did not reach average levels of clinical improvement.

Results: The study included 173 patients. Mean DASH score before surgery was 74 (SD, 19; range, 0-100). After surgery, this improved to 50 (SD, 24; range, 0-100) by 0 to 2 months, 22 (SD, 22; range, 0-98) by 3 to 6 months, and 9.8 (SD, 15; range, 0-75) by a minimum of 9 to 12 months. Overall, 96% of patients reached the MCID by 1 year. Mean cumulative number of MCIDs achieved (ie, number of 14-point decreases in DASH score) at each interval was 1.57, 3.64, and 4.43, respectively. Assuming 4.43 represents maximum average improvement at 1 year, patients achieved 35% (1.57 of 4.43) of recovery from 0 to 2 months after surgery and 82% (3.64 of 4.43) of recovery by 3 to 6 months after surgery. There appeared to be no difference in terms of age, sex, or body mass index with respect to these findings.

Conclusions: Overall, 96% of patients undergoing DRF fixation will achieve one DASH MCID by 1 year after surgery. Patients achieved over 80% of total expected functional improvement by 3 to 6 months after surgery, which appeared to be irrespective of age, sex, or body mass index.

Type Of Study/level Of Evidence: Therapeutic IV.

Citing Articles

Outcomes in Patients with Bilateral Distal Radius Fractures.

Kwan S, McEntee R, Sodha S, Kwok M, Beredjiklian P, Tulipan J J Wrist Surg. 2025; 14(1):49-56.

PMID: 39896914 PMC: 11781855. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777023.


Study of Hamate Fractures in a Single Tertiary Hands Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature Review.

Rogers R, Luk L, Ross R, Cowling L, Wall B, Lawson-Smith M J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024; 6(3):344-348.

PMID: 38817751 PMC: 11133886. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.02.002.


Trajectory of Recovery following ORIF for Distal Radius Fractures.

Larose G, Roffey D, Broekhuyse H, Guy P, OBrien P, Lefaivre K J Wrist Surg. 2024; 13(3):230-235.

PMID: 38808181 PMC: 11129881. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771045.


The Efficacy of WALANT Technique in the Management of Distal End Radius Fracture - A Case Series.

Sarode R, Chaudhary S, Sakharkar N, Adewar A, Jain P, Giri V J Orthop Case Rep. 2024; 14(3):29-34.

PMID: 38560313 PMC: 10976537. DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i03.4276.


Use of Plain Radiography of Uninjured Wrists as Patient-Specific Markers of Successful Reduction of Unilateral Distal Radius Fractures.

Hwang L, Greige N, Wang F, Yi J, Treiser M, Ricci J Hand (N Y). 2022; 17(1_suppl):129S-134S.

PMID: 35502541 PMC: 9793610. DOI: 10.1177/15589447221092057.

References
1.
Bernstein D, Nwachukwu B, Bozic K . Value-based Health Care: Moving Beyond "Minimum Clinically Important Difference" to a Tiered System of Evaluating Successful Clinical Outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019; 477(5):945-947. PMC: 6494330. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000741. View

2.
Hudak P, Amadio P, Bombardier C . Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29(6):602-8. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L. View

3.
Shields E, Sundem L, Childs S, Maceroli M, Humphrey C, Ketz J . Factors predicting patient-reported functional outcome scores after humeral shaft fractures. Injury. 2015; 46(4):693-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.027. View

4.
Beaton D, Wright J, Katz J . Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(5):1038-46. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02060. View

5.
Fujihara Y, Shauver M, Lark M, Zhong L, Chung K . The Effect of Workers' Compensation on Outcome Measurement Methods after Upper Extremity Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 139(4):923-933. PMC: 5373484. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003154. View