» Articles » PMID: 35414204

Thulium Fiber Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Prospective Study of Mid- and Long-Term Outcomes in 1328 Patients

Overview
Journal J Endourol
Publisher Mary Ann Liebert
Date 2022 Apr 13
PMID 35414204
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of our study was to estimate the long-term efficacy and safety of thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP). We analyzed patients who underwent ThuFLEP due to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) related to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Both the pre- and perioperative data as well as the follow-up data for 3 years were evaluated: prostate volume, postvoid residual (PVR), maximum flow rate (Qmax), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), prostate-specific antigen level, and the complication rate. Intraoperative data relating to the weight of resected tissue, the duration of surgery, catheterization, and data on hospital stays were also collected. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess whether older patients (>65 years) or those with larger glands (>80 cc) are prone to increased complication risks. A total of 1328 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 66.9 ± 7.5 years. Mean prostate volume was 86.9 ± 41.9 (20-330) cc. All the functional parameters (IPSS, QoL, PVR, Qmax) significantly improved after surgery ( < 0.05) and showed durable improvement up to 3 years of follow-up. The frequency of late complications was as follows: stress urinary incontinence-1.2%; urethral stricture-1.1%; and bladder neck contracture-0.9%. Subgroup analyses revealed increased urinary tract infection frequency in older patients (3.5% 0.8%,  = 0.003) as well as higher rate of stress urinary incontinence (0.4% 1.8%,  = 0.002) and higher rate of clot retention (11.3% 4.4%,  < 0.001) in those with larger glands. Irrespective of the patient's age and prostate volume, ThuFLEP represents an effective and durable technique of endoscopic enucleation characterized by a low incidence of complications after 3 years of follow-up. In the hands of an experienced surgeon, ThuFLEP can rightly be a promising alternative to holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for treatment of LUTS associated with BPO.

Citing Articles

HoLEP versus ThuFLEP in men with very large prostates (> 175 ml).

Aybal H, Yilmaz M, Barlas I, Duvarci M, Guven S, Tunc L World J Urol. 2025; 43(1):109.

PMID: 39918564 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-025-05478-8.


Evaluation of the learning curve for Thulium fiber laser enucleation of prostate (ThuFLEP): retrospective study of a single-surgeon experience in real-world settings.

Barajraji M, Moussa I, Soscia G, Naudin M, Lempereur L, Coscarella M World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):444.

PMID: 39060790 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05167-y.


Comparison of HoLEP, ThuLEP and ThuFLEP in the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Aybal H, Yilmaz M, Barlas I, Duvarci M, Tuncel A, Tunc L World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):374.

PMID: 38871959 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05082-2.


Influence of Prostate Volume on the Incidence of Complications and Urinary Incontinence Following Thulium Fiber Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Results from Multicenter, Real-world Experience of 2732 patients.

Castellani D, Enikeev D, Gokce M, Petov V, Gadzhiev N, Mahajan A Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024; 63:38-43.

PMID: 38558764 PMC: 10981004. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.03.004.


Propensity score-matched analysis comparing perioperative, functional, and safety outcomes between thulium fiber laser and bipolar enucleation of the prostate performed by a single surgeon with two years of follow-up.

Kamalov A, Sorokin N, Dzitiev V, Strigunov A, Nesterova O, Bondar I Investig Clin Urol. 2024; 65(2):139-147.

PMID: 38454823 PMC: 10925738. DOI: 10.4111/icu.20230270.