» Articles » PMID: 35409802

Savings and Losses of Scarce Virtual Water in the International Trade of Wheat, Maize, and Rice

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Apr 12
PMID 35409802
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The international cereal trade can mitigate global water stress by saving virtual scarce water (VSW). Based on bilateral trade data, this study assessed VSW savings and losses in the international trade of three major cereals (i.e., wheat, maize, and rice) from 2008 to 2017 by incorporating the water stress index (WSI) into a virtual water assessment. We found that the trade in wheat and maize saved a significant amount of VSW, while the rice trade led to increasingly severe losses of VSW. This study identified the top trades of VSW savings and losses for each cereal. Wheat and maize were primarily exported from the countries that are relatively abundant in water resources (e.g., United States, Brazil, Argentina, Russia) to water-scarce countries (e.g., Mexico and Egypt), whereas rice was exported mainly from India and Pakistan, two of the most water-stressed countries. We suggest that policy makers consider VSW savings and losses when making cereal trading decisions to alleviate global water stress.

Citing Articles

Global food trade alleviates transgressions of planetary boundaries at the national scale.

Liao X, Liu A, Chai L iScience. 2023; 26(10):107794.

PMID: 37720085 PMC: 10504541. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107794.


Understanding Global Rice Trade Flows: Network Evolution and Implications.

Chen W, Zhao X Foods. 2023; 12(17).

PMID: 37685236 PMC: 10486664. DOI: 10.3390/foods12173298.


Invisible Effect of Virtual Water Transfer on Water Quantity Conflict in Transboundary Rivers-Taking Ili River as a Case.

Xu X, Wu F, Yu Q, Chen X, Zhao Y Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(15).

PMID: 35897300 PMC: 9330114. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19158917.

References
1.
Finogenova N, Dolganova I, Berger M, Nunez M, Blizniukova D, Muller-Frank A . Water footprint of German agricultural imports: Local impacts due to global trade flows in a fifteen-year perspective. Sci Total Environ. 2019; 662:521-529. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.264. View

2.
Dalin C, Konar M, Hanasaki N, Rinaldo A, Rodriguez-Iturbe I . Evolution of the global virtual water trade network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(16):5989-94. PMC: 3341016. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1203176109. View

3.
Antonelli M, Tamea S, Yang H . Intra-EU agricultural trade, virtual water flows and policy implications. Sci Total Environ. 2017; 587-588:439-448. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.105. View

4.
Oki T, Kanae S . Virtual water trade and world water resources. Water Sci Technol. 2004; 49(7):203-9. View

5.
Vallino E, Ridolfi L, Laio F . Trade of economically and physically scarce virtual water in the global food network. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):22806. PMC: 8611042. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01514-w. View