» Articles » PMID: 35406947

Metabolomic Profiling of During Different Stages of Fruit Development

Overview
Journal Plants (Basel)
Date 2022 Apr 12
PMID 35406947
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Citrus fruits undergo significant metabolic profile changes during their development process. However, limited information is available on the changes in the metabolites of during fruit development. Here, we analyzed the total phenolic content (TPC), total carotenoid content (TCC), antioxidant activity, and metabolite profiles in fruit flesh during different stages of fruit development and evaluated their correlations. The TPC and antioxidant activity significantly decreased during fruit development, whereas the TCC increased. The metabolite profiles, including sugars, acidic compounds, amino acids, flavonoids, limonoids, carotenoids, and volatile compounds (mono- and sesquiterpenes), in fruit flesh also changed significantly, and a citrus metabolomic pathway related to fruit development was proposed. Based on the data, fruit development was classified into three groups: Group 1 (Aug. 1), Group 2 (Aug. 31 and Sep. 14), and Group 3 (Oct. 15 and Nov. 16). Although citrus peel was not analyzed and the sensory and functional qualities during fruit development were not investigated, the results of this study will help in our understanding of the changes in chemical profile during citrus fruit development. This can provide vital information for various applications in the industry.

Citing Articles

NMR metabolomics as a complementary tool to brix-acid tests for navel orange quality control of long-term cold storage.

Montgomery K, Elhabashy A, Del Carmen Reynoso Rivas M, Brar G, Krishnan V Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30078.

PMID: 39627282 PMC: 11615199. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77871-z.


Metabolite Variations during the First Weeks of Growth of Immature and by Untargeted Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/Mass Spectrometry Metabolomics.

Deschamps E, Durand-Hulak M, Castagnos D, Hubert-Roux M, Schmitz I, Froelicher Y Molecules. 2024; 29(16).

PMID: 39202798 PMC: 11357260. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29163718.


Volatile metabolomics and transcriptomics analyses provide insights into the mechanism of volatile changes during fruit development of 'Ehime 38' () and its bud mutant.

He J, Qin Z, Liu K, Li X, Kou Y, Jin Z Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1430204.

PMID: 38984161 PMC: 11231921. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1430204.


Analysis of Flavonoid Metabolites in at Different Collection Stages Using UPLC-ESI-MS/MS.

Chen Y, Xu Y, Wen J, Yu Y, Wu J, Cheng L Foods. 2023; 12(21).

PMID: 37959064 PMC: 10648965. DOI: 10.3390/foods12213945.


Metabolomic analyses provide insights into the preharvest rind disorder in Satsuma Owari Mandarin.

Pervaiz T, Park S, Rezk A, Hur M, Obenland D, Arpaia M Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1263354.

PMID: 37822340 PMC: 10562707. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1263354.


References
1.
Gupta A, Dhua S, Sahu P, Abate G, Mishra P, Mastinu A . Variation in Phytochemical, Antioxidant and Volatile Composition of Pomelo Fruit ( (L.) Osbeck) during Seasonal Growth and Development. Plants (Basel). 2021; 10(9). PMC: 8467822. DOI: 10.3390/plants10091941. View

2.
Multari S, Licciardello C, Caruso M, Martens S . Monitoring the changes in phenolic compounds and carotenoids occurring during fruit development in the tissues of four citrus fruits. Food Res Int. 2020; 134:109228. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109228. View

3.
Zheng X, Tang Y, Ye J, Pan Z, Tan M, Xie Z . SLAF-Based Construction of a High-Density Genetic Map and Its Application in QTL Mapping of Carotenoids Content in Citrus Fruit. J Agric Food Chem. 2018; 67(3):994-1002. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b05176. View

4.
Kim D, Kim B, Lee H, Jang G, Song S, Lee J . Effects of Different Salt Treatments on the Fermentation Metabolites and Bacterial Profiles of Kimchi. J Food Sci. 2017; 82(5):1124-1131. DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.13713. View

5.
Hou J, Liang L, Wang Y . Volatile composition changes in navel orange at different growth stages by HS-SPME-GC-MS. Food Res Int. 2020; 136:109333. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109333. View