» Articles » PMID: 35397575

Supportive Oncology Care at Home Interventions: Protocols for Clinical Trials to Shift the Paradigm of Care for Patients with Cancer

Abstract

Background: Patients with cancer often endure substantial symptoms and treatment toxicities leading to high healthcare utilization, including hospitalizations and emergency department visits, throughout the continuum of their illness. Innovative oncology care models are needed to improve patient outcomes and reduce their healthcare utilization. Using a novel hospital at home care platform, we developed a Supportive Oncology Care at Home intervention to address the needs of patients with cancer.

Methods: We are conducting three trials to delineate the role of Supportive Oncology Care at Home for patients with cancer. The Supportive Oncology Care at Home intervention includes: (1) a hospital at home care model for symptom assessment and management; (2) remote monitoring of daily patient-reported symptoms, vital signs, and body weight; and (3) structured communication with the oncology team. Our first study is a randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of Supportive Oncology Care at Home versus standard oncology care for improving healthcare utilization, cancer treatment interruptions, and patient-reported outcomes in patients with cancer receiving definitive treatment of their cancer. Participants include adult patients with gastrointestinal and head and neck cancer, as well as lymphoma, receiving definitive treatment (e.g., treatment with curative intent). The second study is a single-arm trial assessing the feasibility and acceptability of the Supportive Oncology Care at Home intervention for hospitalized patients with advanced cancer. Eligible participants include adult patients with incurable cancer who are admitted with an unplanned hospitalization. The third study is a single-arm trial assessing the feasibility and acceptability of the Supportive Oncology Care at Home intervention to enhance the end-of-life care for patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. Eligible participants include adult patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancy receiving palliative therapy or supportive care alone.

Discussion: These studies are approved by the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Institutional Review Board and are being conducted in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement for non-pharmacological trials. This work has the potential to transform the paradigm of care for patients with cancer by providing them with the necessary support at home to improve their health outcomes and care delivery.

Trial Registrations: NCT04544046, NCT04637035, NCT04690205.

Citing Articles

"The biggest challenge is there's never a routine": a qualitative study of the time burdens of cancer care at home.

Sekar P, Johnson W, George M, Breininger A, Parsons H, Vogel R Support Care Cancer. 2025; 33(2):80.

PMID: 39870939 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-09132-8.


The Importance of Honoring Family Caregiver Burden: Challenges in Mental Health Care Delivery.

Applebaum A, Sannes T J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2024; .

PMID: 39397232 DOI: 10.1007/s10880-024-10051-3.


The effect of social care nurses on health related quality of life in patients with advanced cancer: A non-randomized, multicenter, controlled trial.

Schindel D, Frick J, Gebert P, Grittner U, Letsch A, Schenk L Qual Life Res. 2024; 33(12):3387-3399.

PMID: 39269581 PMC: 11599374. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03780-3.


Care Delivery Interventions for Individuals with Cancer: A Literature Review and Focus on Gastrointestinal Malignancies.

Lam A, Moore V, Nipp R Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(1).

PMID: 38200936 PMC: 10779432. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12010030.


Integration of Remote Symptom and Biometric Monitoring Into the Care of Adult Patients With Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy-A Decentralized Feasibility Pilot Study.

Offodile 2nd A, Delgado D, Lin Y, Geyen D, Miller C, Jain S JCO Oncol Pract. 2023; 19(6):e811-e821.

PMID: 36821818 PMC: 10332844. DOI: 10.1200/OP.22.00676.


References
1.
Gourgou-Bourgade S, Bascoul-Mollevi C, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouche O, Guimbaud R . Impact of FOLFIRINOX compared with gemcitabine on quality of life in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: results from the PRODIGE 4/ACCORD 11 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 31(1):23-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.4869. View

2.
Caplan G, Sulaiman N, Mangin D, Aimonino Ricauda N, Wilson A, Barclay L . A meta-analysis of "hospital in the home". Med J Aust. 2012; 197(9):512-9. DOI: 10.5694/mja12.10480. View

3.
Newcomb R, Nipp R, Waldman L, Greer J, Lage D, Hochberg E . Symptom burden in patients with cancer who are experiencing unplanned hospitalization. Cancer. 2020; 126(12):2924-2933. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32833. View

4.
Cryer L, Shannon S, Van Amsterdam M, Leff B . Costs for 'hospital at home' patients were 19 percent lower, with equal or better outcomes compared to similar inpatients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012; 31(6):1237-43. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1132. View

5.
Labori K, Hjermstad M, Wester T, Buanes T, Loge J . Symptom profiles and palliative care in advanced pancreatic cancer: a prospective study. Support Care Cancer. 2006; 14(11):1126-33. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-006-0067-0. View