» Articles » PMID: 35397368

Chronic Inflammatory Diseases, Subclinical Atherosclerosis, and Cardiovascular Diseases: Design, Objectives, and Baseline Characteristics of a Prospective Case-cohort Study ‒ ELSA-Brasil

Abstract

Objectives: This analysis describes the protocol of a study with a case-cohort to design to prospectively evaluate the incidence of subclinical atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) in Chronic Inflammatory Disease (CID) participants compared to non-diseased ones.

Methods: A high-risk group for CID was defined based on data collected in all visits on self-reported medical diagnosis, use of medicines, and levels of high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein >10 mg/L. The comparison group is the Aleatory Cohort Sample (ACS): a group with 10% of participants selected at baseline who represent the entire cohort. In both groups, specific biomarkers for DIC, markers of subclinical atherosclerosis, and CVD morbimortality will be tested using weighted Cox.

Results: The high-risk group (n = 2,949; aged 53.6 ± 9.2; 65.5% women) and the ACS (n=1543; 52.2±8.8; 54.1% women) were identified. Beyond being older and mostly women, participants in the high-risk group present low average income (29.1% vs. 24.8%, p < 0.0001), higher BMI (Kg/m) (28.1 vs. 26.9, p < 0.0001), higher waist circumference (cm) (93.3 vs. 91, p < 0.0001), higher frequencies of hypertension (40.2% vs. 34.5%, p < 0.0001), diabetes (20.7% vs. 17%, p = 0.003) depression (5.8% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.007) and higher levels of GlycA a new inflammatory marker (p < 0.0001) compared to the ACS.

Conclusions: The high-risk group selected mostly women, older, lower-income/education, higher BMI, waist circumference, and of hypertension, diabetes, depression, and higher levels of GlycA when compared to the ACS. The strategy chosen to define the high-risk group seems adequate given that multiple sociodemographic and clinical characteristics are compatible with CID.

Citing Articles

Eight-year change in carotid intima-media thickness and associated risk factors in adults with and without psoriasis - the ELSA-Brasil cohort study.

Tebar W, Santos I, Meneghini V, Bittencourt M, Lotufo P, Bensenor I Braz J Med Biol Res. 2023; 56:e12609.

PMID: 36856257 PMC: 9974072. DOI: 10.1590/1414-431X2023e12609.

References
1.
. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018; 392(10159):1736-1788. PMC: 6227606. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32203-7. View

2.
Barlow W, Ichikawa L, ROSNER D, Izumi S . Analysis of case-cohort designs. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999; 52(12):1165-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00102-x. View

3.
Kuller L, Mackey R, Walitt B, Deane K, Holers V, Robinson W . Determinants of mortality among postmenopausal women in the women's health initiative who report rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014; 66(3):497-507. PMC: 5638120. DOI: 10.1002/art.38268. View

4.
Fedeli L, Vidigal P, Leite C, Castilhos C, Pimentel R, Maniero V . [Logistics of collection and transportation of biological samples and the organization of the central laboratory in the ELSA-Brasil]. Rev Saude Publica. 2013; 47 Suppl 2:63-71. DOI: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2013047003807. View

5.
Abdul Sultan A, Crooks C, Card T, Tata L, Fleming K, West J . Causes of death in people with coeliac disease in England compared with the general population: a competing risk analysis. Gut. 2014; 64(8):1220-6. PMC: 4515984. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308285. View