» Articles » PMID: 35397109

Deep Learning Approach for Bubble Segmentation from Hysteroscopic Images

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2022 Apr 9
PMID 35397109
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Gas embolism is a potentially serious complication of hysteroscopic surgery. It is particularly necessary to monitor bubble parameters in hysteroscopic images by computer vision method for helping develop automatic bubble removal devices. In this work, a framework combining a deep edge-aware network and marker-controlled watershed algorithm is presented to extract bubble parameters from hysteroscopy images. The proposed edge-aware network consists of an encoder-decoder architecture for bubble segmentation and a contour branch which is supervised by edge losses. The post-processing method based on marker-controlled watershed algorithm is used to further separate bubble instances and calculate size distribution. Extensive experiments substantiate that the proposed model achieves better performance than some typical segmentation methods. Accuracy, sensitivity, precision, Dice score, and mean intersection over union (mean IoU) obtained for the proposed edge-aware network are observed as 0.859 ± 0.017, 0.868 ± 0.019, 0.955 ± 0.005, 0.862 ± 0.005, and 0.758 ± 0.007, respectively. This work provides a valuable reference for automatic bubble removal devices in hysteroscopic surgery.

Citing Articles

Bridging the Diagnostic Gap between Histopathologic and Hysteroscopic Chronic Endometritis with Deep Learning Models.

Kitaya K, Yasuo T, Yamaguchi T Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(6).

PMID: 38929589 PMC: 11205857. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60060972.


End-to-End Bubble Size Distribution Detection Technique in Dense Bubbly Flows Based on You Only Look Once Architecture.

Chen M, Zhang C, Yang W, Zhang S, Huang W Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(14).

PMID: 37514874 PMC: 10383167. DOI: 10.3390/s23146582.

References
1.
Groenman F, Peters L, Rademaker B, Bakkum E . Embolism of air and gas in hysteroscopic procedures: pathophysiology and implication for daily practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008; 15(2):241-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.10.010. View

2.
Sabsovich I, Abel M, Lee C, Spinelli A, Abramowicz A . Air embolism during operative hysteroscopy: TEE-guided resuscitation. J Clin Anesth. 2012; 24(6):480-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2012.01.002. View

3.
Vilos G, Hutson J, Singh I, Giannakopoulos F, Rafea B, Vilos A . Venous Gas Embolism during Hysteroscopic Endometrial Ablation: Report of 5 Cases and Review of the Literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019; 27(3):748-754. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.05.003. View

4.
Corson S, Brooks P, Soderstrom R . Gynecologic endoscopic gas embolism. Fertil Steril. 1996; 65(3):529-33. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58148-5. View

5.
Munro M, Weisberg M, Rubinstein E . Gas and air embolization during hysteroscopic electrosurgical vaporization: comparison of gas generation using bipolar and monopolar electrodes in an experimental model. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001; 8(4):488-94. DOI: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60609-3. View