» Articles » PMID: 35389715

Salience by Competitive and Recurrent Interactions: Bridging Neural Spiking and Computation in Visual Attention

Overview
Journal Psychol Rev
Specialty Psychology
Date 2022 Apr 7
PMID 35389715
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Decisions about where to move the eyes depend on neurons in frontal eye field (FEF). Movement neurons in FEF accumulate salience evidence derived from FEF visual neurons to select the location of a saccade target among distractors. How visual neurons achieve this salience representation is unknown. We present a neuro-computational model of target selection called salience by competitive and recurrent interactions (SCRI), based on the competitive interaction model of attentional selection and decision-making (Smith & Sewell, 2013). SCRI selects targets by synthesizing localization and identification information to yield a dynamically evolving representation of salience across the visual field. SCRI accounts for neural spiking of individual FEF visual neurons, explaining idiosyncratic differences in neural dynamics with specific parameters. Many visual neurons resolve the competition between search items through feedforward inhibition between signals representing different search items, some also require lateral inhibition, and many act as recurrent gates to modulate the incoming flow of information about stimulus identity. SCRI was tested further by using simulated spiking representations of visual salience as input to the gated accumulator model of FEF movement neurons (Purcell et al., 2010, 2012). Predicted saccade response times fit those observed for search arrays of different set sizes and different target-distractor similarities, and accumulator trajectories replicated movement neuron discharge rates. These findings offer new insights into visual decision-making through converging neuro-computational constraints and provide a novel computational account of the diversity of FEF visual neurons. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

Vision of objects happens faster and earlier for location than for identity.

Poth C, Schneider W iScience. 2025; 28(2):111702.

PMID: 39898052 PMC: 11787497. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111702.


Relating a Spiking Neural Network Model and the Diffusion Model of Decision-Making.

Umakantha A, Purcell B, Palmeri T Comput Brain Behav. 2022; 5(3):279-301.

PMID: 36408474 PMC: 9673774. DOI: 10.1007/s42113-022-00143-4.

References
1.
Kruger A, Tunnermann J, Scharlau I . Measuring and modeling salience with the theory of visual attention. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017; 79(6):1593-1614. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1325-6. View

2.
Rae B, Heathcote A, Donkin C, Averell L, Brown S . The hare and the tortoise: emphasizing speed can change the evidence used to make decisions. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014; 40(5):1226-43. DOI: 10.1037/a0036801. View

3.
Cox G, Shiffrin R . A dynamic approach to recognition memory. Psychol Rev. 2017; 124(6):795-860. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000076. View

4.
Heinzle J, Hepp K, Martin K . A microcircuit model of the frontal eye fields. J Neurosci. 2007; 27(35):9341-53. PMC: 6673112. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0974-07.2007. View

5.
Palmeri T . An exemplar of model-based cognitive neuroscience. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013; 18(2):67-9. PMC: 3946720. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.014. View