Impact of Mode of Conception on Early Pregnancy Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Rise and Birth Weight

Overview

Journal F S Rep

Specialty Reproductive Medicine

Date 2022 Apr 7

PMID 35386502

Authors

Hayley Richardson

Charikleia Kalliora

Monica Mainigi

Christos Coutifaris

Mary D Sammel

Suneeta Senapati

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether the mode of conception and embryo biopsy impact first-trimester human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) dynamics and subsequent risk of small for gestational age (SGA) or large for gestational age (LGA).

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: University fertility center.

Patients: Six hundred-two pregnant patients with singleton live births.

Interventions: Serial serum hCG measurements were obtained between 10 and 28 days postconception to determine the within-woman rate of change in hCG (slope) by mode of conception (unassisted pregnancy, fresh embryo transfer (ET), frozen ET, and frozen ET following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).

Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcomes included birth weight, SGA, and LGA.

Results: Mode of conception is not independently associated with birth weight, SGA, or LGA. Mediation analysis revealed an expected one-day increase in log-transformed hCG varied by mode of conception: unassisted (0.41), fresh ET (0.39), frozen ET (0.42), PGT-A (0.44). Human chorionic gonadotropin rise has a positive effect on birth weight (55 g per SD increase in hCG slope) and is associated with SGA (odds ratio, 0.65), but not with LGA (odds ratio, 1.18).

Conclusions: Human chorionic gonadotropin rise is an important mediator of the mode of conception/birth weight relationship. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy has the highest rate of hCG rise, followed by frozen ET, unassisted, and fresh ET. Faster rise is associated with higher birth weight and lower risk of SGA but does not impact LGA risk. Importantly, PGT-A does not increase the risk of extreme birth weight relative to other modes of conception evaluated.

Citing Articles

Birthweight after assisted reproductive technology: clinical decision-making and patient counseling.

Burks H F S Rep. 2022; 3(1):8-9.

PMID: 35386507 PMC: 8978074. DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2022.02.003.

References

Adamson G, de Mouzon J, Chambers G, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishihara O . International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology: world report on assisted reproductive technology, 2011. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110(6):1067-1080. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.039. View

Sato T, Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozawa F, Yamamoto T, Kato T, Kurahashi H . Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss due to embryonic aneuploidy or recurrent implantation failure. Hum Reprod. 2019; 34(12):2340-2348. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez229. View

Zhang W, von Versen-Hoynck F, Kapphahn K, Fleischmann R, Zhao Q, Baker V . Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with trophectoderm biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2019; 112(2):283-290.e2. PMC: 6527329. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.03.033. View

Berntsen S, Soderstrom-Anttila V, Wennerholm U, Laivuori H, Loft A, Oldereid N . The health of children conceived by ART: 'the chicken or the egg?'. Hum Reprod Update. 2019; 25(2):137-158. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmz001. View

Vitez S, Forman E, Williams Z . Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in early pregnancy loss. Semin Perinatol. 2019; 43(2):116-120. DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2018.12.009. View

Jain T . Socioeconomic and racial disparities among infertility patients seeking care. Fertil Steril. 2006; 85(4):876-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1338. View

Finken M, van der Steen M, Smeets C, Walenkamp M, de Bruin C, Hokken-Koelega A . Children Born Small for Gestational Age: Differential Diagnosis, Molecular Genetic Evaluation, and Implications. Endocr Rev. 2018; 39(6):851-894. DOI: 10.1210/er.2018-00083. View

Seifer D, Simsek B, Wantman E, Kotlyar A . Status of racial disparities between black and white women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in the US. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020; 18(1):113. PMC: 7677830. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-020-00662-4. View

Chung K, Sammel M, Coutifaris C, Chalian R, Lin K, Castelbaum A . Defining the rise of serum HCG in viable pregnancies achieved through use of IVF. Hum Reprod. 2005; 21(3):823-8. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dei389. View

10.

Lu M, Wen Y, Liu Y, Ding C, Zhou C, Xu Y . Trophectoderm biopsy reduces the level of serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin in early pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2020; 114(4):801-808. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.05.015. View

11.

Sunderam S, Kissin D, Zhang Y, Folger S, Boulet S, Warner L . Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2016. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019; 68(4):1-23. PMC: 6493873. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6804a1. View

12.

Keane K, Mustafa K, Hinchliffe P, Conceicao J, Yovich J . Higher β-HCG concentrations and higher birthweights ensue from single vitrified embryo transfers. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016; 33(2):149-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.04.014. View

13.

Barnhart K . Assisted reproductive technologies and perinatal morbidity: interrogating the association. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99(2):299-302. PMC: 3564059. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.032. View

14.

Berntsen S, Pinborg A . Large for gestational age and macrosomia in singletons born after frozen/thawed embryo transfer (FET) in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Birth Defects Res. 2018; 110(8):630-643. DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.1219. View

15.

Olsen I, Groveman S, Lawson M, Clark R, Zemel B . New intrauterine growth curves based on United States data. Pediatrics. 2010; 125(2):e214-24. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-0913. View

16.

Laird N, Ware J . Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics. 1982; 38(4):963-74. View

17.

Maldonado G, Greenland S . Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. Am J Epidemiol. 1993; 138(11):923-36. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116813. View

18.

Weissmann-Brenner A, Simchen M, Zilberberg E, Kalter A, Weisz B, Achiron R . Maternal and neonatal outcomes of large for gestational age pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012; 91(7):844-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01412.x. View

19.

Fauser B . Towards the global coverage of a unified registry of IVF outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018; 38(2):133-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.001. View

20.

Barnhart K, Guo W, Cary M, Morse C, Chung K, Takacs P . Differences in Serum Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Rise in Early Pregnancy by Race and Value at Presentation. Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 128(3):504-511. PMC: 4993627. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001568. View