» Articles » PMID: 35386253

A New Birthweight Reference by Gestational Age: A Population Study Based on the Generalized Additive Model for Location, Scale, and Shape Method

Overview
Journal Front Pediatr
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2022 Apr 7
PMID 35386253
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: It is important to choose a suitable birthweight reference to assess newborns, especially those that are small for gestational age (SGA). Currently, there is no regional standard reference for the north of China or for Shandong province.

Methods: A total of 130,911 data records of singleton, live neonates born at 24-42 weeks of gestation were collected from 2016 to 2018 in Shandong province. A new birthweight-for-gestational age percentile reference was constructed based on the Generalized Additive Model for Location, Scale and Shape (GAMLSS) package in R version 3.5. The established gestational age weight curve was compared separately with the Fenton curve, INTERGROWTH-21st curve, and the Chinese Neonatal Network Standard curve of 2015.

Results: We established the reference values of birthweight by gestational age at the 3rd, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, and 97th percentiles. Newborns had much heavier birthweights than those in the INTERGROWTH-21st and Fenton curves at most gestational ages. Although the newborns' birthweight references were closer to the Chinese Neonatal Network Standard except a few for gestational age, this study and INTERGROWTH-21st had similar birthweight curve shapes.

Conclusions: There are obvious differences among the criteria for newborn birthweights. Therefore, it is more accurate to assess newborns using the local birthweight reference.

Citing Articles

The growth diversity of preterm infants at 0-36 months corrected age in China: a real-world observational study.

Wang X, Feng S, Yang P, Wang Y, Wei C, Zheng J Front Pediatr. 2025; 13:1506244.

PMID: 39959411 PMC: 11825782. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2025.1506244.


Comparison of Intergrowth-21st and Fenton growth standards to evaluate and predict the postnatal growth in eastern Chinese preterm infants.

Lan S, Fu H, Zhang C, Chen Y, Pan L, Song S Front Pediatr. 2023; 11:1259744.

PMID: 38089687 PMC: 10713837. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1259744.


Editorial: Utilization of healthcare services for children in low and middle-income countries: Its determinants and child health outcomes.

Thakur B, Pathak M Front Pediatr. 2022; 10:1014775.

PMID: 36389383 PMC: 9640727. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.1014775.


Differences in Postnatal Growth of Preterm Infants in Northern China Compared to the INTERGROWTH-21st Preterm Postnatal Growth Standards: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Zhang L, Gao N, Liu H, Wu Q, Liu J, Zhang T Front Pediatr. 2022; 10:871453.

PMID: 35769217 PMC: 9234397. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.871453.

References
1.
Seaton S, Yadav K, Field D, Khunti K, Manktelow B . Birthweight centile charts for South Asian infants born in the UK. Neonatology. 2011; 100(4):398-403. PMC: 3217051. DOI: 10.1159/000325916. View

2.
Araujo de Franca G, De Lucia Rolfe E, Horta B, Gigante D, Yudkin J, Ong K . Associations of birth weight, linear growth and relative weight gain throughout life with abdominal fat depots in adulthood: the 1982 Pelotas (Brazil) birth cohort study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015; 40(1):14-21. PMC: 4722236. DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2015.192. View

3.
Fenton T, Nasser R, Eliasziw M, Kim J, Bilan D, Sauve R . Validating the weight gain of preterm infants between the reference growth curve of the fetus and the term infant. BMC Pediatr. 2013; 13:92. PMC: 3700759. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-92. View

4.
Kong X, Xu F, Wu R, Wu H, Ju R, Zhao X . Neonatal mortality and morbidity among infants between 24 to 31 complete weeks: a multicenter survey in China from 2013 to 2014. BMC Pediatr. 2016; 16(1):174. PMC: 5094017. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-016-0716-5. View

5.
Olsen I, Groveman S, Lawson M, Clark R, Zemel B . New intrauterine growth curves based on United States data. Pediatrics. 2010; 125(2):e214-24. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-0913. View