» Articles » PMID: 35384778

Particle Size, Mass Concentration, and Microbiota in Dental Aerosols

Overview
Journal J Dent Res
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2022 Apr 6
PMID 35384778
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many dental procedures are considered aerosol-generating procedures that may put the dental operator and patients at risk for cross-infection due to contamination from nasal secretions and saliva. This aerosol, depending on the size of the particles, may stay suspended in the air for hours. The primary objective of the study was to characterize the size and concentrations of particles emitted from 7 different dental procedures, as well as estimate the contribution of the nasal and salivary fluids of the patient to the microbiota in the emitted bioaerosol. This cross-sectional study was conducted in an open-concept dental clinic with multiple operators at the same time. Particle size characterization and mass and particle concentrations were done by using 2 direct reading instruments: Dust-Trak DRX (Model 8534) and optical particle sizer (Model 3330). Active bioaerosol sampling was done before and during procedures. Bayesian modeling (SourceTracker2) of long-reads of the 16S ribosomal DNA was used to estimate the contribution of the patients' nasal and salivary fluids to the bioaerosol. Aerosols in most dental procedures were sub-PM dominant. Orthodontic debonding and denture adjustment consistently demonstrated more particles in the PM, PM, PM, and PM ranges. The microbiota in bioaerosol samples were significantly different from saliva and nasal samples in both membership and abundance ( < 0.05) but not different from preoperative ambient air samples. A median of 80.15% of operator exposure was attributable to sources other than the patients' salivary or nasal fluids. Median operator's exposure from patients' fluids ranged from 1.45% to 2.75%. Corridor microbiota showed more patients' nasal bioaerosols than oral bioaerosols. High-volume saliva ejector and saliva ejector were effective in reducing bioaerosol escape. Patient nasal and salivary fluids are minor contributors to the operator's bioaerosol exposure, which has important implications for COVID-19. Control of bioaerosolization of nasal fluids warrants further investigation.

Citing Articles

Bioaerosols and Airborne Transmission in the Dental Clinic.

Allison J, Tiede S, Holliday R, Durham J, Jakubovics N Int Dent J. 2024; 74 Suppl 2:S418-S428.

PMID: 39515929 PMC: 11583874. DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.09.026.


Aerosol-generating procedures and associated control/mitigation measures: Position paper from the Canadian Dental Hygienists Association and the American Dental Hygienists' Association.

Ghoneim A, Proano D, Kaur H, Singhal S Can J Dent Hyg. 2024; 58(1):48-63.

PMID: 38505316 PMC: 10946320.


Quantitative Evaluation of Aerosols Produced in the Dental Office during Caries Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Matys J, Gedrange T, Dominiak M, Grzech-Lesniak K J Clin Med. 2023; 12(14).

PMID: 37510712 PMC: 10380424. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144597.


Evaluation of aerosols in a simulated orthodontic debanding procedure.

Pratt A, Eckermann N, Rengasamy Venugopalan S, Uribe L, Barlow L, Nonnenmann M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):4826.

PMID: 36964164 PMC: 10036970. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32082-w.


Aerosol concentrations and size distributions during clinical dental procedures.

Lahdentausta L, Sanmark E, Lauretsalo S, Korkee V, Nyman S, Atanasova N Heliyon. 2022; 8(10):e11074.

PMID: 36303931 PMC: 9593181. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11074.

References
1.
Timmerman M, Menso L, Steinfort J, van Winkelhoff A, Van der Weijden G . Atmospheric contamination during ultrasonic scaling. J Clin Periodontol. 2004; 31(6):458-62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00511.x. View

2.
van Cleef B, van Rijen M, Ferket M, Kluytmans J . Self-sampling is appropriate for detection of Staphylococcus aureus: a validation study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2012; 1(1):34. PMC: 3546066. DOI: 10.1186/2047-2994-1-34. View

3.
Polednik B . Aerosol and bioaerosol particles in a dental office. Environ Res. 2014; 134:405-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.06.027. View

4.
Ohlwein S, Kappeler R, Kutlar Joss M, Kunzli N, Hoffmann B . Health effects of ultrafine particles: a systematic literature review update of epidemiological evidence. Int J Public Health. 2019; 64(4):547-559. DOI: 10.1007/s00038-019-01202-7. View

5.
Zou L, Ruan F, Huang M, Liang L, Huang H, Hong Z . SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Upper Respiratory Specimens of Infected Patients. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(12):1177-1179. PMC: 7121626. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2001737. View