» Articles » PMID: 35383277

Locoregional Tumor Burden and Risk of Mortality in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Overview
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Apr 6
PMID 35383277
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The role of lymph node involvement and tumor size in metastatic disease including breast cancer is unclear. Here, nodal metastasis and T stage on the risk of mortality were investigated in de novo metastatic breast cancer population (35812 patients) in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program database in the United States. We found an association between all-cause mortality and regional node involvement (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-1.55, p < 0.0001) or T stage (HR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.14-1.25, p < 0.0001), independent of known clinicopathologic measurements. Number of positive nodes, and size and chest wall involvement of the breast tumors exhibited similar significance for breast cancer-specific mortality in the population (p < 0.0001 each), and all-cause mortality in hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative (HR/HER2), HR/HER2, HR/HER2 and triple-negative metastatic breast cancer subtypes. Thus, nodal involvement and T stage are independent risk factors for mortality in the population of de novo metastatic breast cancer.

Citing Articles

Elacestrant plus alpelisib in an and co-mutated and heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer: the first case report for combination efficacy and safety.

Tokat U, Bilgic S, Aydin E, Adibi A, Ozgu E, Tutar O Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024; 16:17588359241297101.

PMID: 39539943 PMC: 11558728. DOI: 10.1177/17588359241297101.


Subdivision of M1 category and prognostic stage for de novo metastatic breast cancer to enhance prognostic prediction and guide the selection of locoregional therapy.

Ji L, Song G, Xiao M, Chen X, Li Q, Wang J Thorac Cancer. 2024; 15(30):2193-2205.

PMID: 39279162 PMC: 11496194. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.15452.


HIV-related stigma and associated factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dessie Z, Zewotir T Front Public Health. 2024; 12():1356430.

PMID: 39109161 PMC: 11300231. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1356430.


Patterns of metastasis and survival outcomes by age in breast cancer patients: a SEER population-based study.

Xiao Q, Zhang W, Jing J, Zhong T, Li D, Zhou J Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1184895.

PMID: 38027167 PMC: 10657995. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1184895.


Single-Cell Transcriptomic Profiles of Lung Pre-Metastatic Niche Reveal Neutrophil and Lymphatic Endothelial Cell Roles in Breast Cancer.

Huang Y, Chang C, Wu Y, Wu K, Tsai Y, Lee H Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(1).

PMID: 36612175 PMC: 9818165. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010176.

References
1.
Carter C, Allen C, Henson D . Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases. Cancer. 1989; 63(1):181-7. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<181::aid-cncr2820630129>3.0.co;2-h. View

2.
Hortobagyi G, Smith T, Legha S, Swenerton K, Gehan E, Yap H . Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1983; 1(12):776-86. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1983.1.12.776. View

3.
Siegel R, Miller K, Fuchs H, Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022; 72(1):7-33. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21708. View

4.
Prat A, Cheang M, Galvan P, Nuciforo P, Pare L, Adamo B . Prognostic Value of Intrinsic Subtypes in Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated With Letrozole With or Without Lapatinib. JAMA Oncol. 2016; 2(10):1287-1294. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0922. View

5.
DeSantis C, Ma J, Gaudet M, Newman L, Miller K, Sauer A . Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019; 69(6):438-451. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21583. View