» Articles » PMID: 35382922

Different Definitions of Multimorbidity and Their Effect on Prevalence Rates: a Retrospective Study in German General Practices

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Multimorbidity is common among general practice patients and increases a general practitioner's (GP's) workload. But the extent of multimorbidity may depend on its definition and whether a time delimiter is included in the definition or not.

Aims: The aims of the study were (1) to compare practice prevalence rates yielded by different models of multimorbidity, (2) to determine how a time delimiter influences the prevalence rates and (3) to assess the effects of multimorbidity on the number of direct and indirect patient contacts as an indicator of doctors' workload.

Methods: This retrospective observational study used electronic medical records from 142 German general practices, covering 13 years from 1994 to 2007. The four models of multimorbidity ranged from a simple definition, requiring only two diseases, to an advanced definition requiring at least three chronic conditions. We also included a time delimiter for the definition of multimorbidity. Descriptive statistics, such as means and correlation coefficients, were applied.

Findings: The annual percentage of multimorbid primary care patients ranged between 84% (simple model) and 16% (advanced model) and between 74% and 13% if a time delimiter was included. Multimorbid patients had about twice as many contacts annually than the remainder. The number of contacts were different for each model, but the ratio remained similar. The number of contacts correlated moderately with patient age (r = 0.35). The correlation between age and multimorbidity increased from model to model up to 0.28 while the correlations between contacts and multimorbidity varied around 0.2 in all four models.

Conclusion: Multimorbidity seems to be less prevalent in primary care practices than usually estimated if advanced definitions of multimorbidity and a temporal delimiter are applied. Although multimorbidity increases in any model a doctor's workload, it is especially the older person with multiple chronic diseases who is a challenge for the GP.

Citing Articles

Asking the generalist - evaluation of a General Practice rounding and consult service.

Schmalstieg-Bahr K, MacDonald S, Pohontsch N, Debus S, Scherer M BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):113.

PMID: 38627632 PMC: 11020190. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02353-0.


The association between restricted activity and patient outcomes in older adults: systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Henderson I, Bone R, Stevens R, Barnes R, Roberts N, Sheppard J BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):316.

PMID: 38575915 PMC: 10993524. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-04866-w.


Age, sex, and socioeconomic differences in multimorbidity measured in four ways: UK primary care cross-sectional analysis.

MacRae C, Mercer S, Henderson D, McMinn M, Morales D, Jefferson E Br J Gen Pract. 2023; 73(729):e249-e256.

PMID: 36997222 PMC: 9923763. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0405.

References
1.
Lowe D, Taylor M, Hill S . Cross-sectional examination of musculoskeletal conditions and multimorbidity: influence of different thresholds and definitions on prevalence and association estimates. BMC Res Notes. 2017; 10(1):51. PMC: 5242059. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-017-2376-4. View

2.
Le Reste J, Nabbe P, Lingner H, Kasuba Lazic D, Assenova R, Munoz M . What research agenda could be generated from the European General Practice Research Network concept of Multimorbidity in Family Practice?. BMC Fam Pract. 2015; 16:125. PMC: 4574005. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-015-0337-3. View

3.
Hobbs F, Bankhead C, Mukhtar T, Stevens S, Perera-Salazar R, Holt T . Clinical workload in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 100 million consultations in England, 2007-14. Lancet. 2016; 387(10035):2323-2330. PMC: 4899422. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00620-6. View

4.
Boyd C, Darer J, Boult C, Fried L, Boult L, Wu A . Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA. 2005; 294(6):716-24. DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.6.716. View

5.
Hauswaldt J, Himmel W, Hummers-Pradier E . The inter-contact interval: a new measure to define frequent attenders in primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2013; 14:162. PMC: 3834877. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-162. View