» Articles » PMID: 35380535

Noisy Metabolism Can Promote Microbial Cross-feeding

Overview
Journal Elife
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Apr 5
PMID 35380535
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cross-feeding, the exchange of nutrients between organisms, is ubiquitous in microbial communities. Despite its importance in natural and engineered microbial systems, our understanding of how inter-species cross-feeding arises is incomplete, with existing theories limited to specific scenarios. Here, we introduce a novel theory for the emergence of such cross-feeding, which we term noise-averaging cooperation (NAC). NAC is based on the idea that, due to their small size, bacteria are prone to noisy regulation of metabolism which limits their growth rate. To compensate, related bacteria can share metabolites with each other to 'average out' noise and improve their collective growth. According to the Black Queen Hypothesis, this metabolite sharing among kin, a form of 'leakage', then allows for the evolution of metabolic interdependencies among species including de novo speciation via gene deletions. We first characterize NAC in a simple ecological model of cell metabolism, showing that metabolite leakage can in principle substantially increase growth rate in a community context. Next, we develop a generalized framework for estimating the potential benefits of NAC among real bacteria. Using single-cell protein abundance data, we predict that bacteria suffer from substantial noise-driven growth inefficiencies, and may therefore benefit from NAC. We then discuss potential evolutionary pathways for the emergence of NAC. Finally, we review existing evidence for NAC and outline potential experimental approaches to detect NAC in microbial communities.

Citing Articles

Critical assessment of quenching and extraction/sample preparation methods for microorganisms in metabolomics.

Sedighikamal H, Mashayekhan S Metabolomics. 2025; 21(2):40.

PMID: 40082321 DOI: 10.1007/s11306-025-02228-0.


Fitness and adaptive evolution of a Rhodococcus sp. harboring dioxin-catabolic plasmids.

Wang X, Fu C, Chen M, Wu Y, Chen Y, Chen Y World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2025; 41(2):51.

PMID: 39865154 DOI: 10.1007/s11274-025-04270-5.


Collective dynamical regimes predict invasion success and impacts in microbial communities.

Hu J, Barbier M, Bunin G, Gore J Nat Ecol Evol. 2025; 9(3):406-416.

PMID: 39762572 PMC: 11893462. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02618-y.


Niche availability and competitive loss by facilitation control proliferation of bacterial strains intended for soil microbiome interventions.

causevic S, Dubey M, Morales M, Salazar G, Sentchilo V, Carraro N Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):2557.

PMID: 38519488 PMC: 10959995. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46933-1.


Ecological dependencies and the illusion of cooperation in microbial communities.

Hesse E, OBrien S Microbiology (Reading). 2024; 170(2).

PMID: 38385784 PMC: 10924460. DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.001442.


References
1.
Goyal A, Maslov S . Diversity, Stability, and Reproducibility in Stochastically Assembled Microbial Ecosystems. Phys Rev Lett. 2018; 120(15):158102. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.158102. View

2.
Nelson M, Morrison M, Yu Z . A meta-analysis of the microbial diversity observed in anaerobic digesters. Bioresour Technol. 2011; 102(4):3730-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.119. View

3.
Tikhonov M, Monasson R . Collective Phase in Resource Competition in a Highly Diverse Ecosystem. Phys Rev Lett. 2017; 118(4):048103. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.048103. View

4.
Lloyd-Price J, Abu-Ali G, Huttenhower C . The healthy human microbiome. Genome Med. 2016; 8(1):51. PMC: 4848870. DOI: 10.1186/s13073-016-0307-y. View

5.
Pfeiffer T, Bonhoeffer S . Evolution of cross-feeding in microbial populations. Am Nat. 2004; 163(6):E126-35. DOI: 10.1086/383593. View