Long-term Neurologic Outcome After Spinal Ependymoma Resection With Multimodal Intraoperative Electrophysiological Recording: Cohort Study and Review of the Literature

Overview

Journal Neurospine

Date 2022 Apr 5

PMID 35378586

Authors

Gregoire P Chatain

Michael W Kortz

Stephanie Serva

Keshari Shrestha

Patrick Hosokawa

Timothy H Ung

Michael Finn

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate how multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) changes during spinal ependymoma (SE) resection correlate with long-term neuro-functional outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients aged 18 years or older who underwent surgical resection for SE over a 10-year period was conducted. IONM changes were defined as sustained transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) and/or somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) signal decrease of 50% or greater from baseline. Primary endpoints were postoperative modified McCormick Neurologic Scale (MNS) scores at postoperative day (POD) < 2, 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

Results: Twenty-nine patients were identified. Average age was 44.2 ± 15.4 years. Sixteen (55.2%) were male and 13 (44.8%) were female. Tumor location was 10 cervical-predominant (34.5%), 13 thoracic-predominant (44.8%), and 6 lumbar/conus-predominant (20.7%). A majority (69.0%) were World Health Organization grade 2 tumors. Twentyfour patients (82.8%) achieved gross total resection. Thirteen patients (44.8%) had a sustained documented IONM signal change and 10 (34.5%) had a TcMEP change with or without derangement in SSEP. At POD < 2, 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years, MNS was significantly higher for those when analyzing subgroups with either any sustained IONM or TcMEP ± SSEP signal attenuation > 50% below baseline (all p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Sustained IONM derangements > 50% below baseline, particularly for TcMEP, are significantly associated with higher MNS postoperatively out to 2 years. Intraoperative and postoperative management of these patients warrant special consideration to limit neurologic morbidity.

Citing Articles

Survival of pediatric patients with ependymoma in a tertiary cancer center in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Oigman G, Gonzaga Y, Christiani M, Magalhaes D, Moreira V, Osorio D Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1296636.

PMID: 39525624 PMC: 11543490. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1296636.

Dorsal cervical approach for recurrent intradural anaplastic ependymoma.

Laws M, Arhin M, Ampie L, Chittiboina P Neurosurg Focus Video. 2023; 9(2):V2.

PMID: 37854648 PMC: 10580737. DOI: 10.3171/2023.6.FOCVID2396.

References

Rijs K, Klimek M, Scheltens-de Boer M, Biesheuvel K, Harhangi B . Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Patients with Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Case Series. World Neurosurg. 2019; 125:498-510.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.007. View

Behmanesh B, Gessler F, Dutzmann S, Dubinski D, Imoehl L, Seifert V . Natural history of intramedullary spinal cord ependymoma in patients preferring nonoperative treatment. J Neurooncol. 2017; 135(1):93-98. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2552-3. View

Hongo H, Takai K, Komori T, Taniguchi M . Intramedullary spinal cord ependymoma and astrocytoma: intraoperative frozen-section diagnosis, extent of resection, and outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018; 30(1):133-139. DOI: 10.3171/2018.7.SPINE18230. View

Oh M, Sayegh E, Safaee M, Sun M, Kaur G, Kim J . Prognosis by tumor location for pediatric spinal cord ependymomas. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2012; 11(3):282-8. DOI: 10.3171/2012.11.PEDS12292. View

Azad T, Pendharkar A, Nguyen V, Pan J, Connolly I, Veeravagu A . Diagnostic Utility of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Spine Surg. 2017; 31(3):112-119. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000558. View

Bostrom A, Kanther N, Grote A, Bostrom J . Management and outcome in adult intramedullary spinal cord tumours: a 20-year single institution experience. BMC Res Notes. 2014; 7:908. PMC: 4302119. DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-908. View

Cooper P . Outcome after operative treatment of intramedullary spinal cord tumors in adults: intermediate and long-term results in 51 patients. Neurosurgery. 1989; 25(6):855-9. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-198912000-00001. View

Hyun S, Rhim S . Combined motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring for intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery: correlation of clinical and neurophysiological data in 17 consecutive procedures. Br J Neurosurg. 2009; 23(4):393-400. DOI: 10.1080/02688690902964744. View

Westphal M, Mende K, Eicker S . Refining the treatment of spinal cord lesions: experience from 500 cases. Neurosurg Focus. 2021; 50(5):E22. DOI: 10.3171/2021.2.FOCUS201107. View

10.

Alizada O, Kemerdere R, Ulu M, Akgun M, Isler C, Kizilkilic O . Surgical management of spinal intramedullary tumors: Ten-year experience in a single institution. J Clin Neurosci. 2020; 73:201-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.12.054. View

11.

Skinner S, Nagib M, Bergman T, Maxwell R, Msangi G . The initial use of free-running electromyography to detect early motor tract injury during resection of intramedullary spinal cord lesions. Neurosurgery. 2005; 56(2 Suppl):299-314. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000156545.33814.8d. View

12.

Milicevic M, Solari D, Illic R, Frio F, Stanimirovic A, Savic D . The Impact of Intraoperative Monitoring on Extent of Resection and Long-Term Neurological Outcomes: A Series of 39 Intramedullary Ependimomas. Turk Neurosurg. 2020; 30(2):252-262. DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.27471-19.2. View

13.

Li T, Chu J, Xu Y, Yang J, Wang J, Huang Y . Surgical strategies and outcomes of spinal ependymomas of different lengths: analysis of 210 patients: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014; 21(2):249-59. DOI: 10.3171/2014.3.SPINE13481. View

14.

Ghadirpour R, Nasi D, Iaccarino C, Romano A, Motti L, Sabadini R . Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for intradural extramedullary spinal tumors: predictive value and relevance of D-wave amplitude on surgical outcome during a 10-year experience. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018; 30(2):259-267. DOI: 10.3171/2018.7.SPINE18278. View

15.

Vauzelle C, STAGNARA P, JOUVINROUX P . Functional monitoring of spinal cord activity during spinal surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1973; (93):173-8. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-197306000-00017. View

16.

Kothbauer K . Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring for intramedullary spinal-cord tumor surgery. Neurophysiol Clin. 2007; 37(6):407-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2007.10.003. View

17.

Lin Y, Huang C, Wong T, Chen M, Shiau C, Wang L . Treatment of spinal cord ependymomas by surgery with or without postoperative radiotherapy. J Neurooncol. 2005; 71(2):205-10. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-004-1386-y. View

18.

Kimchi G, Knoller N, Korn A, Eyal-Mazuz Y, Sapir Y, Peled A . Delayed variations in the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative neuromonitoring in the resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors. Neurosurg Focus. 2021; 50(5):E21. DOI: 10.3171/2021.2.FOCUS201084. View

19.

Kim D, Son Y, Park Y, Hyun S, Kim K, Jahng T . Differences in Multimodality Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Changes Between Spinal Intramedullary Ependymoma and Hemangioblastoma. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2015; 33(2):120-6. DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000247. View

20.

Kobayashi S, Matsuyama Y, Shinomiya K, Kawabata S, Ando M, Kanchiku T . A new alarm point of transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring: a prospective multicenter study from the Spinal Cord Monitoring Working Group of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and.... J Neurosurg Spine. 2013; 20(1):102-7. DOI: 10.3171/2013.10.SPINE12944. View