» Articles » PMID: 35372017

Development of a Risk Assessment Model for Early Grade ≥ 3 Infection During the First 3 Months in Patients Newly Diagnosed With Multiple Myeloma Based on a Multicenter, Real-World Analysis in China

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Apr 4
PMID 35372017
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The study aimed to assess factors associated with early infection and identify patients at high risk of developing infection in multiple myeloma.

Methods: The study retrospectively analyzed patients with MM seen at two medical centers between January 2013 and June 2019. One medical center reported 745 cases, of which 540 of the cases were available for analysis and were further subdivided into training cohort and internal validation cohort. 169 cases from the other medical center served as an external validation cohort. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression model was used for data dimension reduction, feature selection, and model building.

Results: Bacteria and the respiratory tract were the most common pathogen and localization of infection, respectively. In the training cohort, PS≥2, HGB<35g/L of the lower limit of normal range, β2MG≥6.0mg/L, and GLB≥2.1 times the upper limit of normal range were identified as factors associated with early grade ≥ 3 infections by Lasso regression. An infection risk model of MM (IRMM) was established to define high-, moderate- and low-risk groups, which showed significantly different rates of infection in the training cohort (46.5% vs. 22.1% vs. 8.8%, <0.0001), internal validation cohort (37.9% vs. 24.1% vs. 13.0%, =0.009) and external validation cohort (40.0% vs. 29.2% vs. 8.5%, =0.0003). IRMM displayed good calibration (<0.05) and discrimination with AUC values of 0.76, 0.67 and 0.71 in the three cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, IRMM still showed good classification ability in immunomodulatory (IMiD) based regimens, proteasome-inhibitors (PI) based regimens and combined IMiD and PI regimens.

Conclusion: In this study, we determined risk factors for early grade ≥ 3 infection and established a predictive model to help clinicians identify MM patients with high-risk infection.

Citing Articles

Advanced disease and CD8 TEMRA cells predict severe infections in multiple myeloma.

Tranter E, Busch D, Heck C, Blau I, Nogai A, Schiele P Front Immunol. 2025; 16:1532645.

PMID: 40013147 PMC: 11862831. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1532645.


Managing and treating COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancies: a narrative review and expert insights.

Ng H, Alata M, Nguyen Q, Huynh Duc Vinh P, Tan J, Wong C Clin Exp Med. 2024; 24(1):119.

PMID: 38833206 PMC: 11150206. DOI: 10.1007/s10238-024-01381-5.


Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, 2-microglobulin, hemoglobin, and lactate dehydrogenase can predict early grade ≥ 3 infection in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A real-world multicenter study.

Lu X, Liu W, Zhang L, Chen X, Yang L, Yao Q Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1114972.

PMID: 36778870 PMC: 9911534. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1114972.


Characteristics of inpatients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in hematology, nephrology, and orthopedic departments.

Zhang Y, Pan J, Kang H, Peng S, Tung T, Shen B Ann Hematol. 2023; 102(4):801-809.

PMID: 36752842 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05115-7.


Machine learning-based infection prediction model for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.

Peng T, Liu L, Liu F, Ding L, Liu J, Zhou H Front Neuroinform. 2023; 16:1063610.

PMID: 36713288 PMC: 9880856. DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2022.1063610.

References
1.
Choi S, Reddy P . Current and emerging strategies for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014; 11(9):536-47. PMC: 4151470. DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.102. View

2.
Rollig C, Knop S, Bornhauser M . Multiple myeloma. Lancet. 2014; 385(9983):2197-208. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60493-1. View

3.
T V, V G, A N . Multiple Myeloma Index for Risk of Infection. J Cancer. 2018; 9(12):2211-2214. PMC: 6010689. DOI: 10.7150/jca.24288. View

4.
Rajkumar S, Dimopoulos M, Palumbo A, Blade J, Merlini G, Mateos M . International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15(12):e538-48. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5. View

5.
Blimark C, Holmberg E, Mellqvist U, Landgren O, Bjorkholm M, Hultcrantz M . Multiple myeloma and infections: a population-based study on 9253 multiple myeloma patients. Haematologica. 2014; 100(1):107-13. PMC: 4281323. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2014.107714. View