» Articles » PMID: 35370788

Corticospinal Excitability Is Lower During Eccentric Than Concentric Cycling in Men

Overview
Journal Front Physiol
Date 2022 Apr 4
PMID 35370788
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

How corticospinal excitability changes during eccentric locomotor exercise is unknown. In the present study, 13 volunteers performed 30-min strenuous concentric and eccentric cycling bouts at the same power output (60% concentric peak power output). Transcranial magnetic and electrical femoral nerve stimulations were applied at exercise onset (3rd min) and end (25th min). Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) amplitude was measured for the rectus femoris (RF) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles with surface electromyography (EMG) and expressed as a percentage of maximal M-wave amplitude (M). EMG amplitude 100 ms prior to MEPs and the silent period duration were calculated. There was no change in any neural parameter during the exercises (all > 0.24). VL and RF M were unaffected by exercise modality (all > 0.38). VL MEP amplitude was greater (26 ± 11.4 vs. 15.2 ± 7.7% M; = 0.008) during concentric than eccentric cycling whereas RF MEP amplitude was not different (24.4 ± 10.8 vs. 17.2 ± 9.8% M; = 0.051). While VL EMG was higher during concentric than eccentric cycling ( = 0.03), RF EMG showed no significant difference ( = 0.07). Similar silent period durations were found (RF: 120 ± 30 ms; VL: 114 ± 27 ms; all > 0.61), but the silent period/MEP ratio was higher during eccentric than concentric cycling for both muscles (all < 0.02). In conclusion, corticospinal excitability to the knee extensors is lower and relative silent period longer during eccentric than concentric cycling, yet both remained unaltered with time.

Citing Articles

Characteristics of motor evoked potentials in patients with peripheral vascular disease.

Sarai P, Luff C, Rohani-Shukla C, Strutton P PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0290491.

PMID: 38662756 PMC: 11045072. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290491.


Corticospinal and spinal responses following a single session of lower limb motor skill and resistance training.

Woodhead A, Rainer C, Hill J, Murphy C, North J, Kidgell D Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024; 124(8):2401-2416.

PMID: 38532177 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-024-05464-9.


Reliability and Variability of Lower Limb Muscle Activation as Indicators of Familiarity to Submaximal Eccentric Cycling.

Walsh J, McAndrew D, Shemmell J, Stapley P Front Physiol. 2022; 13:953517.

PMID: 35874539 PMC: 9304807. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.953517.


High Estrogen Levels Cause Greater Leg Muscle Fatigability in Eumenorrheic Young Women after 4 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Deters J, Fietsam A, Workman C, Rudroff T Brain Sci. 2022; 12(4).

PMID: 35448037 PMC: 9032567. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12040506.

References
1.
Forssberg H, Grillner S, Rossignol S . Phasic gain control of reflexes from the dorsum of the paw during spinal locomotion. Brain Res. 1977; 132(1):121-39. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90710-7. View

2.
Halperin I, Emanuel A . Rating of Perceived Effort: Methodological Concerns and Future Directions. Sports Med. 2019; 50(4):679-687. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-019-01229-z. View

3.
Skarabot J, Mesquita R, Brownstein C, Ansdell P . Myths and Methodologies: How loud is the story told by the transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked silent period?. Exp Physiol. 2019; 104(5):635-642. DOI: 10.1113/EP087557. View

4.
Zehr E, Klimstra M, Johnson E, Carroll T . Rhythmic leg cycling modulates forearm muscle H-reflex amplitude and corticospinal tract excitability. Neurosci Lett. 2007; 419(1):10-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.03.045. View

5.
Doguet V, Nosaka K, Guevel A, Thickbroom G, Ishimura K, Jubeau M . Muscle length effect on corticospinal excitability during maximal concentric, isometric and eccentric contractions of the knee extensors. Exp Physiol. 2017; 102(11):1513-1523. DOI: 10.1113/EP086480. View