» Articles » PMID: 35366884

Stiffness Optimization and Reliable Design of a Hip Implant by Using the Potential of Additive Manufacturing Processes

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Apr 3
PMID 35366884
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Due to the steadily increasing life expectancy of the population, the need for medical aids to maintain the previous quality of life is growing. The basis for independent mobility is a functional locomotor system. The hip joint can be so badly damaged by everyday wear or accelerated by illness that reconstruction by means of endoprostheses is necessary.

Results: In order to ensure a high quality of life for the patient after this procedure as well as a long service life of the prosthesis, a high-quality design is required, so that many different aspects have to be taken into account when developing prostheses. Long-term medical studies show that the service life and operational safety of a hip prosthesis by best possible adaptation of the stiffness to that of the bone can be increased. The use of additive manufacturing processes enables to specifically change the stiffness of implant structures.

Conclusions: Reduced implant stiffness leads to an increase in stress in the surrounding bone and thus to a reduction in bone resorption. Numerical methods are used to demonstrate this fact in the hip implant developed. The safety of use is nevertheless ensured by evaluating and taking into account the stresses that occur for critical load cases. These results are a promising basis to enable longer service life of prostheses in the future.

Citing Articles

Advanced porous hip implants: A comprehensive review.

Ziaie B, Velay X, Saleem W Heliyon. 2024; 10(18):e37818.

PMID: 39328514 PMC: 11425102. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37818.


Extension of the Voronoi Diagram Algorithm to Orthotropic Space for Material Structural Design.

Bolshakov P, Kharin N, Agathonov A, Kalinin E, Sachenkov O Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(3).

PMID: 38534870 PMC: 10968305. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9030185.


Design and biomechanical analysis of patientspecific porous tantalum prostheses for knee joint revision surgery.

Mao S, Liu Y, Wang F, He P, Wu X, Ma X Int J Bioprint. 2023; 9(4):735.

PMID: 37323501 PMC: 10261154. DOI: 10.18063/ijb.735.


Numerical and Experimental Study of a Lattice Structure for Orthopedic Applications.

Kharin N, Bolshakov P, Kuchumov A Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(2).

PMID: 36676480 PMC: 9864782. DOI: 10.3390/ma16020744.

References
1.
Brown T, Larson B, Shen F, Moskal J . Thigh pain after cementless total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002; 10(6):385-92. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200211000-00002. View

2.
Diehl P, Haenle M, Bergschmidt P, Gollwitzer H, Schauwecker J, Bader R . [Cementless total hip arthroplasty: a review]. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2010; 55(5):251-64. DOI: 10.1515/BMT.2010.037. View

3.
Schmitt-Sody M, Pilger V, Gerdesmeyer L . [Rehabilitation and sport following total hip replacement]. Orthopade. 2011; 40(6):513-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-011-1761-2. View

4.
Gulow J, Scholz R, von Salis-Soglio G . [Short-stemmed endoprostheses in total hip arthroplasty]. Orthopade. 2007; 36(4):353-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-007-1071-x. View

5.
Jerosch J, von Engelhardt L . A Differentiated View on Short Stemmed Hip Arthroplasty - What are the Differences in Fixation and Biomechanics?. Z Orthop Unfall. 2019; 157(5):548-557. DOI: 10.1055/a-0808-5115. View