» Articles » PMID: 35364026

Discontinuation, Suboptimal Adherence, and Reinitiation of Oral HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis: a Global Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Lancet HIV
Date 2022 Apr 1
PMID 35364026
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Poor adherence to oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) diminishes its clinical and public health benefits. This study synthesises evidence regarding discontinuation, adherence, and reinitiation of PrEP among geographically diverse PrEP users.

Methods: We did a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating studies published in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to Dec 18, 2020. We included longitudinal studies that presented data for PrEP discontinuation, defined as investigator-reported loss to follow-up or participant self-reported PrEP stoppage. Data were extracted from published reports and assessed for risk of bias. We used a random-effects meta-analysis to pool estimates of discontinuation and I and τ to evaluate heterogeneity. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020155675.

Findings: We identified 4129 records, of which 59 articles were included (n=43 917 participants). 41·0% (95% CI 18·8-63·5) of participants discontinued PrEP within 6 months, with the highest rates in observational studies. The discontinuation rate in sub-Saharan Africa (47·5%, 95% CI: 29·4-66·4%) was higher than in other regions (p<0·001). Discontinuation rates were lower in studies with adherence interventions than in those without (24·7% vs 36·7%, p=0·015). Gay or bisexual men who have sex with men and transgender women offered daily or non-daily dosing options had lower discontinuation rates than those offered daily dosing alone (21·6% vs 31·5%; p<0·001). The pooled suboptimal adherence within 6 months was 37·7% (95% CI 8·4-66·9). Among people who discontinued PrEP, 47·3% (95% CI 31·5-63·2) reinitiated PrEP within 1 year of PrEP initiation. The included studies had poor quality in terms of study design, with a moderate risk of bias.

Interpretation: Strategies to encourage reinitiating PrEP for new or persistent risk should be a focus of future PrEP implementation strategies.

Funding: National Institutes of Health and Nature Science Foundation of China.

Citing Articles

HIV incidence and adherence after pre-exposure prophylaxis initiation in key populations in Indonesia: Findings from a real-world pilot program 2021-2023.

Hanum N, Handayani M, Padmasawitri A, Zazuli Z, Anggadiredja K, Pohan M IJID Reg. 2025; 14:100573.

PMID: 39995503 PMC: 11848754. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2025.100573.


It Is a Catch-22 Situation! A Decade of Research Trends on Gay Wellbeing in China: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Gong J, Miao W Behav Sci (Basel). 2025; 15(1.

PMID: 39851903 PMC: 11760453. DOI: 10.3390/bs15010099.


Engagement in Preexposure Prophylaxis Care at 1 Year Among Men Who Have Sex With Men Enrolled in the French ANRS PREVENIR Cohort Study.

Liegeon G, Assoumou L, Beniguel L, Palich R, Pialoux G, Slama L Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025; 12(1):ofae744.

PMID: 39845018 PMC: 11752861. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae744.


Performance of indirect adherence measures for daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV among adolescent men who have sex with men and transgender women in Brazil.

Zeballos D, Magno L, Soares F, Pinto Junior J, Amorim L, Greco D PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0310861.

PMID: 39739641 PMC: 11687640. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310861.


"Youth are experts in what they need": experiences and best practice in co-designing and implementing Fast-PrEP, a novel PrEP service for adolescents and youth in Cape Town, South Africa.

Bennin F, Fynn L, Fuzile P, Yola N, Julies R, Sindelo S Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1459418.

PMID: 39717042 PMC: 11664220. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1459418.


References
1.
Marcus J, Hurley L, Hare C, Nguyen D, Phengrasamy T, Silverberg M . Preexposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention in a Large Integrated Health Care System: Adherence, Renal Safety, and Discontinuation. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016; 73(5):540-546. PMC: 5424697. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001129. View

2.
Dombrowski J, Golden M, Barbee L, Khosropour C . Patient Disengagement From an HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Program in a Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic. Sex Transm Dis. 2018; 45(9):e62-e64. PMC: 6086745. DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000823. View

3.
Coyer L, van den Elshout M, Achterbergh R, Matser A, Schim van der Loeff M, Davidovich U . Understanding pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) regimen use: Switching and discontinuing daily and event-driven PrEP among men who have sex with men. EClinicalMedicine. 2020; 29-30:100650. PMC: 7711206. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100650. View

4.
Molina J, Capitant C, Spire B, Pialoux G, Cotte L, Charreau I . On-Demand Preexposure Prophylaxis in Men at High Risk for HIV-1 Infection. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373(23):2237-46. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506273. View

5.
Morrison A, Polisena J, Husereau D, Moulton K, Clark M, Fiander M . The effect of English-language restriction on systematic review-based meta-analyses: a systematic review of empirical studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012; 28(2):138-44. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462312000086. View