Based on Billions of Words on the Internet, People = Men

Overview

Journal Sci Adv

Specialties Biology
Science

Date 2022 Apr 1

PMID 35363515

Authors

April H Bailey

Adina Williams

Andrei Cimpian

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Recent advances have made it possible to precisely measure the extent to which any two words are used in similar contexts. In turn, this measure of similarity in linguistic context also captures the extent to which the concepts being denoted are similar. When extracted from massive corpora of text written by millions of individuals, this measure of linguistic similarity can provide insight into the collective concepts of a linguistic community, concepts that both reflect and reinforce widespread ways of thinking. Using this approach, we investigated the collective concept person/people, which forms the basis for nearly all societal decision- and policy-making. In three studies and three preregistered replications with similarity metrics extracted from a corpus of over 630 billion English words, we found that the collective concept person/people is not gender-neutral but rather prioritizes men over women-a fundamental bias in our species' collective view of itself.

Citing Articles

Directionality and representativeness are differentiable components of stereotypes in large language models.

Nicolas G, Caliskan A PNAS Nexus. 2024; 3(11):pgae493.

PMID: 39588319 PMC: 11586767. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae493.

Nature is resource, playground, and gift: What artificial intelligence reveals about human-Nature relationships.

Gould R, Demarest B, Ivakhiv A, Cheney N PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0297294.

PMID: 38885213 PMC: 11182501. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297294.

Online images amplify gender bias.

Guilbeault D, Delecourt S, Hull T, Desikan B, Chu M, Nadler E Nature. 2024; 626(8001):1049-1055.

PMID: 38355800 PMC: 10901730. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07068-x.

Gender stereotypes embedded in natural language are stronger in more economically developed and individualistic countries.

Napp C PNAS Nexus. 2023; 2(11):pgad355.

PMID: 38024410 PMC: 10662454. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad355.

Propagation of societal gender inequality by internet search algorithms.

Vlasceanu M, Amodio D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(29):e2204529119.

PMID: 35858360 PMC: 9304000. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2204529119.

References

Goldberg L . An alternative "description of personality": the big-five factor structure. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990; 59(6):1216-29. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1216. View

HOFSTEE W, de Raad B, Goldberg L . Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992; 63(1):146-63. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.63.1.146. View

Lewis M, Lupyan G . Gender stereotypes are reflected in the distributional structure of 25 languages. Nat Hum Behav. 2020; 4(10):1021-1028. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-0918-6. View

Bailey A, LaFrance M, Dovidio J . Is Man the Measure of All Things? A Social Cognitive Account of Androcentrism. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2018; 23(4):307-331. DOI: 10.1177/1088868318782848. View

GREENWALD A, McGhee D, Schwartz J . Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998; 74(6):1464-80. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1464. View

Moscovici S . Attitudes and opinions. Annu Rev Psychol. 1963; 14:231-60. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.14.020163.001311. View

Garg N, Schiebinger L, Jurafsky D, Zou J . Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(16):E3635-E3644. PMC: 5910851. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1720347115. View

DeFranza D, Mishra H, Mishra A . How language shapes prejudice against women: An examination across 45 world languages. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020; 119(1):7-22. DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000188. View

Cohen J . A power primer. Psychol Bull. 2009; 112(1):155-9. DOI: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155. View

10.

Lake B, Murphy G . Word meaning in minds and machines. Psychol Rev. 2021; 130(2):401-431. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000297. View

11.

Caliskan A, Bryson J, Narayanan A . Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science. 2017; 356(6334):183-186. DOI: 10.1126/science.aal4230. View

12.

Bem S . The measurement of psychological androgyny. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974; 42(2):155-62. View

13.

Zhang Y, Chen Q, Yang Z, Lin H, Lu Z . BioWordVec, improving biomedical word embeddings with subword information and MeSH. Sci Data. 2019; 6(1):52. PMC: 6510737. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0055-0. View

14.

Shah S, Dam R, Milano M, Edmunds L, Henderson L, Hartley C . Gender parity in scientific authorship in a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: a bibliometric analysis. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(3):e037935. PMC: 7993305. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037935. View

15.

Koo T, Li M . A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2):155-63. PMC: 4913118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. View

16.

De Raad B, Barelds D, Levert E, Ostendorf F, Mlacic B, Di Blas L . Only three factors of personality description are fully replicable across languages: a comparison of 14 trait taxonomies. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010; 98(1):160-73. DOI: 10.1037/a0017184. View

17.

Charlesworth T, Yang V, Mann T, Kurdi B, Banaji M . Gender Stereotypes in Natural Language: Word Embeddings Show Robust Consistency Across Child and Adult Language Corpora of More Than 65 Million Words. Psychol Sci. 2021; 32(2):218-240. DOI: 10.1177/0956797620963619. View

18.

Eagly A, Nater C, Miller D, Kaufmann M, Sczesny S . Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. Am Psychol. 2019; 75(3):301-315. DOI: 10.1037/amp0000494. View

19.

Saucier G, Iurino K . High-dimensionality personality structure in the natural language: Further analyses of classic sets of English-language trait-adjectives. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019; 119(5):1188-1219. DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000273. View

20.

Wojcik E, Saffran J . Toddlers encode similarities among novel words from meaningful sentences. Cognition. 2015; 138:10-20. PMC: 4366300. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.01.015. View