The Impact of Total Variation Regularized Expectation Maximization Reconstruction on Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT Images in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumor

Overview

Journal Front Med (Lausanne)

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2022 Apr 1

PMID 35360749

Authors

Lin Liu

Hanxiang Liu

Shijie Xu

Shumao Zhang

Yi Tao

Greta S P Mok

Yue Chen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the total variation regularized expectation maximization (TVREM) reconstruction on improving Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT images compared to the ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction.

Method: A total of 17 patients with neuroendocrine tumors who underwent clinical Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT were involved in this study retrospectively. The PET images were acquired with either 3 min-per-bed (min/bed) acquisition time and reconstructed with OSEM (2 iterations, 20 subsets, and a 3.2-mm Gaussian filter) and TVREM (seven penalization factors = 0.01, 0.07, 0.14, 0.21, 0.28, 0.35, and 0.42) for 2 and 3 min-per-bed (min/bed) acquisition time using list-mode. The SUV of the liver, background variability (BV), signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), SUV of the lesions and tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) were measured. The mean percentage difference in the SNR and TBR between TVREM with difference penalization factors and OSEM was calculated. Qualitative image quality was evaluated by two experienced radiologists using a 5-point score scale (5-excellent, 1-poor).

Results: In total, 63 lesions were analyzed in this study. The SUV of the liver did not differ significantly between TVREM and OSEM. The BV of all TVREM groups was lower than OSEM groups (all < 0.05), and the BV of TVREM 2 min/bed group with penalization factor of 0.21 was considered comparable to OSEM 3 min/bed group ( = 0.010 and 0.006). The SNR, SUV and TBR were higher for all TVREM groups compared to OSEM groups (all < 0.05). The mean percentage difference in the SNR and TBR was larger for small lesions (<10 mm) than that for medium (≥10 mm but < 20 mm) and large lesions (≥20 mm). The highest image quality score was given to TVREM 2 min/bed group with penalization factor of 0.21 (3.77 ± 0.26) and TVREM 3 min/bed group with penalization factor of 0.35 (3.77 ± 0.26).

Conclusion: TVREM could reduce image noise, improve the SNR, SUV and TBR of the lesions, and has the potential to preserves the image quality with shorter acquisition time.

Citing Articles

Improved [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 image qualities reconstructed by total variation regularized expectation maximization on total-body PET/CT.

Li L, Chen R, Wen J, Yang X, Hu D, Sun H Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(8):5230-5241.

PMID: 37581091 PMC: 10423362. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-1341.

Phantom and clinical evaluation of the effect of a new Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm (HYPER Iterative) on Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT image quality.

Xu L, Cui C, Li R, Yang R, Liu R, Meng Q EJNMMI Res. 2022; 12(1):73.

PMID: 36504014 PMC: 9742075. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-022-00945-4.

Positron Range Corrections and Denoising Techniques for Gallium-68 PET Imaging: A Literature Review.

Gavriilidis P, Koole M, Annunziata S, Mottaghy F, Wierts R Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(10).

PMID: 36292023 PMC: 9600409. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12102335.

Relation of Brain Perfusion Patterns to Sudden Unexpected Death Risk Stratification: A Study in Drug Resistant Focal Epilepsy.

Chacon L, Galan Garcia L, Bosch-Bayard J, Batista Garcia-Ramo K, Martin M, Alfonso M Behav Sci (Basel). 2022; 12(7).

PMID: 35877277 PMC: 9311833. DOI: 10.3390/bs12070207.

References

Kurita Y, Ichikawa Y, Nakanishi T, Tomita Y, Hasegawa D, Murashima S . The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on F-FDG PET/CT: comparison with ordered subset expectation maximization reconstruction incorporating time-of-flight model and point.... Ann Nucl Med. 2020; 34(4):272-279. DOI: 10.1007/s12149-020-01446-x. View

Witkowska-Patena E, Budzynska A, Gizewska A, Dziuk M, Walecka-Mazur A . Ordered subset expectation maximisation vs Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction algorithm in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. Ann Nucl Med. 2020; 34(3):192-199. PMC: 7033087. DOI: 10.1007/s12149-019-01433-x. View

Yoshii T, Miwa K, Yamaguchi M, Shimada K, Wagatsuma K, Yamao T . Optimization of a Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear) for F-NaF bone PET/CT images acquired over shorter durations using a custom-designed phantom. EJNMMI Phys. 2020; 7(1):56. PMC: 7486353. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-020-00325-8. View

Lindstrom E, Lindsjo L, Sundin A, Sorensen J, Lubberink M . Evaluation of block-sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction of Ga-DOTATOC, F-fluoride, and C-acetate whole-body examinations acquired on a digital time-of-flight PET/CT scanner. EJNMMI Phys. 2020; 7(1):40. PMC: 7295929. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-020-00310-1. View

Liberini V, Messerli M, Husmann L, Kudura K, Grunig H, Maurer A . Improved detection of in-transit metastases of malignant melanoma with BSREM reconstruction in digital [F]FDG PET/CT. Eur Radiol. 2021; 31(10):8011-8020. PMC: 8452544. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07852-7. View

Ter Voert E, Muehlematter U, Delso G, Pizzuto D, Muller J, Nagel H . Quantitative performance and optimal regularization parameter in block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstructions in clinical Ga-PSMA PET/MR. EJNMMI Res. 2018; 8(1):70. PMC: 6063806. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-018-0414-4. View

Lindstrom E, Sundin A, Trampal C, Lindsjo L, Ilan E, Danfors T . Evaluation of Penalized-Likelihood Estimation Reconstruction on a Digital Time-of-Flight PET/CT Scanner for F-FDG Whole-Body Examinations. J Nucl Med. 2018; 59(7):1152-1158. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.200790. View

Teoh E, McGowan D, Macpherson R, Bradley K, Gleeson F . Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System. J Nucl Med. 2015; 56(9):1447-52. PMC: 4558942. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.159301. View

Ahn S, Ross S, Asma E, Miao J, Jin X, Cheng L . Quantitative comparison of OSEM and penalized likelihood image reconstruction using relative difference penalties for clinical PET. Phys Med Biol. 2015; 60(15):5733-51. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/15/5733. View

10.

Yang F, Ai S, Wu R, Lv Y, Xie H, Dong Y . Impact of total variation regularized expectation maximization reconstruction on the image quality of Ga-PSMA PET: a phantom and patient study. Br J Radiol. 2021; 94(1120):20201356. PMC: 8010539. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20201356. View

11.

Hoyer D, Bell G, Berelowitz M, Epelbaum J, Feniuk W, Humphrey P . Classification and nomenclature of somatostatin receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1995; 16(3):86-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-6147(00)88988-9. View

12.

Zanoni L, Argalia G, Fortunati E, Malizia C, Allegri V, Calabro D . Can Q.Clear reconstruction be used to improve [68 Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT image quality in overweight NEN patients?. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021; 49(5):1607-1612. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05592-w. View

13.

Reubi J, Schar J, Waser B, Wenger S, Heppeler A, Schmitt J . Affinity profiles for human somatostatin receptor subtypes SST1-SST5 of somatostatin radiotracers selected for scintigraphic and radiotherapeutic use. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000; 27(3):273-82. DOI: 10.1007/s002590050034. View

14.

Haug A, Cindea-Drimus R, Auernhammer C, Reincke M, Wangler B, Uebleis C . The role of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in suspected neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med. 2012; 53(11):1686-92. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.101675. View

15.

Pelosi G, Volante M, Papotti M, Sonzogni A, Masullo M, Viale G . Peptide receptors in neuroendocrine tumors of the lung as potential tools for radionuclide diagnosis and therapy. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006; 50(4):272-87. View

16.

Haider M, Al-Toubah T, El-Haddad G, Strosberg J . Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumors. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2019; 27(1):16-21. DOI: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000519. View

17.

Chicheportiche A, Goshen E, Godefroy J, Grozinsky-Glasberg S, Oleinikov K, Meirovitz A . Can a penalized-likelihood estimation algorithm be used to reduce the injected dose or the acquisition time in Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT studies?. EJNMMI Phys. 2021; 8(1):13. PMC: 7881076. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-021-00359-6. View

18.

Caplin M, Buscombe J, Hilson A, Jones A, Watkinson A, Burroughs A . Carcinoid tumour. Lancet. 1998; 352(9130):799-805. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)02286-7. View

19.

Liberini V, Kotasidis F, Treyer V, Messerli M, Orita E, Engel-Bicik I . Impact of PET data driven respiratory motion correction and BSREM reconstruction of Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT for differentiating neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and intrapancreatic accessory spleens (IPAS). Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):2273. PMC: 7838183. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80855-4. View

20.

Rogasch J, Suleiman S, Hofheinz F, Bluemel S, Lukas M, Amthauer H . Reconstructed spatial resolution and contrast recovery with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET compared to time-of-flight (TOF) with point spread function (PSF). EJNMMI Phys. 2020; 7(1):2. PMC: 6954158. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-020-0270-y. View