» Articles » PMID: 35360131

Exploring the Structure and Interrelations of Time-Stable Psychological Resilience, Psychological Vulnerability, and Social Cohesion

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2022 Apr 1
PMID 35360131
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The current study explores the relationship between three constructs of high relevance in the context of adversities which have, however, not yet been systematically linked on the level of psychological dispositions: psychological vulnerability, psychological resilience, and social cohesion. Based on previous theoretical and empirical frameworks, a collection of trait questionnaires was assessed in a Berlin sample of 3,522 subjects between 18 and 65 years of age. Using a confirmatory factor analytical approach, we found no support for a simple three-factor structure. Results from exploratory structural analyses suggest that instead of psychological resilience and psychological vulnerability constituting two separate factors, respective indicators load on one bipolar latent factor. Interestingly, some psychological resilience indicators contributed to an additional specific latent factor, which may be interpreted as adaptive capacities, that is, abilities to adapt to changes or adjust to consequences of adversities. Furthermore, instead of evidence for one single social cohesion factor on the psychological level, indicators of perceived social support and loneliness formed another specific factor of social belonging, while indicators of prosocial competencies were found to form yet another distinct factor, which was positively associated to the other social factors, adaptive capacities and social belonging. Our results suggest that social cohesion is composed of different independent psychological components, such as trust, social belonging, and social skills. Furthermore, our findings highlight the importance of social capacities and belonging for psychological resilience and suggest that decreasing loneliness and increasing social skills should therefore represent a valuable intervention strategy to foster adaptive capacities.

Citing Articles

Relationships between Resilience and Self-Efficacy in the Prosocial Behavior of Chilean Elementary School Teachers.

Salvo-Garrido S, Polanco-Levican K, Dominguez-Lara S, Mieres-Chacaltana M, Galvez-Nieto J Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 39199075 PMC: 11352048. DOI: 10.3390/bs14080678.


Heterogeneous Mental Health Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany: An Examination of Long-Term Trajectories, Risk Factors, and Vulnerable Groups.

Godara M, Rademacher J, Hecht M, Silveira S, Voelkle M, Singer T Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(9).

PMID: 37174848 PMC: 10177770. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11091305.


Gene and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms, rs2072446 and rs11466162, Playing Roles in Psychiatric Disorders.

Zhao L, Hou B, Ji L, Ren D, Yuan F, Liu L Brain Sci. 2022; 12(10).

PMID: 36291307 PMC: 9599857. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12101372.


The Wither or Thrive Model of Resilience: an Integrative Framework of Dynamic Vulnerability and Resilience in the Face of Repeated Stressors During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Godara M, Silveira S, Matthaus H, Singer T Advers Resil Sci. 2022; 3(4):261-282.

PMID: 35856054 PMC: 9281234. DOI: 10.1007/s42844-022-00069-7.


Coping with the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perceived Changes in Psychological Vulnerability, Resilience and Social Cohesion before, during and after Lockdown.

Silveira S, Hecht M, Matthaeus H, Adli M, Voelkle M, Singer T Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(6).

PMID: 35328981 PMC: 8952288. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063290.

References
1.
Folkman S, Moskowitz J . Coping: pitfalls and promise. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004; 55:745-74. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141456. View

2.
Ormel J, Jeronimus B, Kotov R, Riese H, Bos E, Hankin B . Neuroticism and common mental disorders: meaning and utility of a complex relationship. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013; 33(5):686-697. PMC: 4382368. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.04.003. View

3.
Decety J, Cowell J . The complex relation between morality and empathy. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014; 18(7):337-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.008. View

4.
Hawkley L, Cacioppo J . Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2010; 40(2):218-27. PMC: 3874845. DOI: 10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8. View

5.
Rutter M . Resilience as a dynamic concept. Dev Psychopathol. 2012; 24(2):335-44. DOI: 10.1017/S0954579412000028. View