» Articles » PMID: 35359825

Nasopharyngeal Cryptococcosis in a Cat: Interlaboratory Variation in Cryptococcal Antigen Assay Test Results

Overview
Journal JFMS Open Rep
Date 2022 Apr 1
PMID 35359825
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Case Summary: An indoor-only 6-year-old spayed female domestic cat was evaluated for a history of stertorous respiration. Skull radiographs revealed increased soft tissue density within the caudal aspect of the left nasal cavity. CT and rhinoscopy revealed a mass lesion in the choana, plus a smaller lesion, nearly completely occluding flow through the nasal passages. Rhinoscopy was used to collect a biopsy specimen from a fleshy, tan-yellow mass visualized in the caudal nasopharynx. Histopathology was diagnostic for species infection and systemic antifungal therapy with fluconazole was initiated. Following a series of discordant results, serum samples were submitted to a veterinary diagnostic laboratory that utilized a cryptococcal antigen latex agglutination system with pretreatment of serum with pronase. Twenty-three months after the initial diagnosis, the cat's serum cryptococcal antigen titer declined to 1:5 and the cat has responded well to continuing treatment.

Relevance And Novel Information: This case illustrates challenges associated with discordant test results for cryptococcal antigen among laboratories. Discordancies may be due to differences in assay design, or the underlying disease state itself, or whether serum is pre-treated with pronase; with some tests relying on the training and experience of the operator if the cryptococcal antigen detection test requires a subjective interpretation. It also resolves some confusion in the literature related to the assay types available and terminology used to describe them, and emphasizes the importance of considering cryptococcosis as an important differential for cats with upper respiratory signs, without nasal discharge, even if the cat is kept exclusively indoors.

Citing Articles

An Anatomical Study Using Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Rhinoscopy of the Nasal Cavity of Domestic Cat ( L.) and Big Cats: Lion ( L.), Leopard ( L.), and Cheetah ( S.).

Diaz Martinez E, Arencibia Espinosa A, Soler Laguia M, Kilroy D, Martinez Gomariz F, Casas Garcia D Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 38672320 PMC: 11047709. DOI: 10.3390/ani14081172.


s rapidly invades the murine brain by sequential breaching of airway and endothelial tissues barriers, followed by engulfment by microglia.

Francis V, Liddle C, Camacho E, Kulkarni M, Junior S, Harvey J mBio. 2024; 15(4):e0307823.

PMID: 38511961 PMC: 11005363. DOI: 10.1128/mbio.03078-23.

References
1.
Lester S, Malik R, Bartlett K, Duncan C . Cryptococcosis: update and emergence of Cryptococcus gattii. Vet Clin Pathol. 2011; 40(1):4-17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2010.00281.x. View

2.
Dolan C . Specificity of the latex-cryptococcal antigen test. Am J Clin Pathol. 1972; 58(4):358-64. DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/58.5.358. View

3.
Pennisi M, Hartmann K, Lloret A, Ferrer L, Addie D, Belak S . Cryptococcosis in cats: ABCD guidelines on prevention and management. J Feline Med Surg. 2013; 15(7):611-8. PMC: 11148960. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X13489224. View

4.
Tanner D, Weinstein M, Fedorciw B, Joho K, THORPE J, Reller L . Comparison of commercial kits for detection of cryptococcal antigen. J Clin Microbiol. 1994; 32(7):1680-4. PMC: 263761. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.32.7.1680-1684.1994. View

5.
OBrien C, Krockenberger M, Wigney D, MARTIN P, Malik R . Retrospective study of feline and canine cryptococcosis in Australia from 1981 to 2001: 195 cases. Med Mycol. 2004; 42(5):449-60. DOI: 10.1080/13693780310001624547. View