» Articles » PMID: 35353984

Polygenic Risk for Prostate Cancer: Decreasing Relative Risk with Age but Little Impact on Absolute Risk

Overview
Journal Am J Hum Genet
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Genetics
Date 2022 Mar 30
PMID 35353984
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for a variety of diseases have recently been shown to have relative risks that depend on age, and genetic relative risks decrease with increasing age. A refined understanding of the age dependency of PRSs for a disease is important for personalized risk predictions and risk stratification. To further evaluate how the PRS relative risk for prostate cancer depends on age, we refined analyses for a validated PRS for prostate cancer by using 64,274 prostate cancer cases and 46,432 controls of diverse ancestry (82.8% European, 9.8% African American, 3.8% Latino, 2.8% Asian, and 0.8% Ghanaian). Our strategy applied a novel weighted proportional hazards model to case-control data to fully utilize age to refine how the relative risk decreased with age. We found significantly greater relative risks for younger men (age 30-55 years) compared with older men (70-88 years) for both relative risk per standard deviation of the PRS and dichotomized according to the upper 90 percentile of the PRS distribution. For the largest European ancestral group that could provide reliable resolution, the log-relative risk decreased approximately linearly from age 50 to age 75. Despite strong evidence of age-dependent genetic relative risk, our results suggest that absolute risk predictions differed little from predictions that assumed a constant relative risk over ages, from short-term to long-term predictions, simplifying implementation of risk discussions into clinical practice.

Citing Articles

COL10A1 Facilitates Prostate Cancer Progression by Interacting With INHBA to Activate the PI3K/AKT Pathway.

Jiang K, Xu L, Cheng F, Ning J J Cell Mol Med. 2024; 28(23):e70249.

PMID: 39656597 PMC: 11629901. DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.70249.


Predictive value of polygenic risk score for prostate cancer incidence and prognosis in the Han Chinese.

Hung S, Chang L, Hsiao T, Wei C, Wang S, Li J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):20453.

PMID: 39227454 PMC: 11372043. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71544-7.


Fast and scalable ensemble learning method for versatile polygenic risk prediction.

Chen T, Zhang H, Mazumder R, Lin X Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(33):e2403210121.

PMID: 39110727 PMC: 11331062. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2403210121.


A unified framework for estimating country-specific cumulative incidence for 18 diseases stratified by polygenic risk.

Jermy B, Lall K, Wolford B, Wang Y, Zguro K, Cheng Y Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):5007.

PMID: 38866767 PMC: 11169548. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-48938-2.


An early-onset specific polygenic risk score optimizes age-based risk estimate and stratification of prostate cancer: population-based cohort study.

Cheng Y, Wu L, Xin J, Ben S, Chen S, Li H J Transl Med. 2024; 22(1):366.

PMID: 38632662 PMC: 11025178. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05190-y.


References
1.
Choi S, OReilly P . PRSice-2: Polygenic Risk Score software for biobank-scale data. Gigascience. 2019; 8(7). PMC: 6629542. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giz082. View

2.
Mavaddat N, Pharoah P, Michailidou K, Tyrer J, Brook M, Bolla M . Prediction of breast cancer risk based on profiling with common genetic variants. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015; 107(5). PMC: 4754625. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv036. View

3.
Davies H, Crombie I, Tavakoli M . When can odds ratios mislead?. BMJ. 1998; 316(7136):989-91. PMC: 1112884. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.316.7136.989. View

4.
Conti D, Darst B, Moss L, Saunders E, Sheng X, Chou A . Trans-ancestry genome-wide association meta-analysis of prostate cancer identifies new susceptibility loci and informs genetic risk prediction. Nat Genet. 2021; 53(1):65-75. PMC: 8148035. DOI: 10.1038/s41588-020-00748-0. View

5.
Martin A, Kanai M, Kamatani Y, Okada Y, Neale B, Daly M . Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities. Nat Genet. 2019; 51(4):584-591. PMC: 6563838. DOI: 10.1038/s41588-019-0379-x. View