» Articles » PMID: 35353203

The Interaction Between Environmental Enrichment and Fluoxetine in Inhibiting Sucrose-seeking Renewal in Mice Depend on Social living Condition

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2022 Mar 30
PMID 35353203
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale: Several single or combined therapeutic approaches have been developed to treat addiction, however with partial efficacy in preventing relapse. Recently, the living environment has been suggested as a critical intervening factor determining the treatment outcomes. Despite accumulating evidence confirming a role of living conditions in the vulnerability to addictive behaviours, their impact on single or integrative therapeutic strategies preventing relapse is yet to be identified.

Objectives: Here, we explore the possible interaction between brief Environmental Enrichment (EE) exposure and acute fluoxetine administration in inhibiting sucrose-seeking behaviours, and whether this effect could be affected by living environment.

Methods: Social and isolated adult male C57BL/6 mice were trained to sucrose self-administration associated to a specific conditioning context (CxA), followed by a 7-day extinction in a different context (CxB). Afterwards, mice were exposed for 22 h to EE and then injected with fluoxetine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) 1 h before a CxA-induced sucrose-seeking test.

Results: Brief EE exposure and acute fluoxetine administration alone inhibited context-induced sucrose-seeking in both housing conditions; however, they exhibited additive properties only in social condition.

Conclusions: Our data show that social environment may influence the EE/fluoxetine interaction in inhibiting relapse to sucrose. These findings suggest that setting up proper living conditions to boost the efficacy of therapeutic approaches may represent a fundamental strategy to treat addiction disorders.

References
1.
Miura H, Qiao H, Ohta T . Attenuating effects of the isolated rearing condition on increased brain serotonin and dopamine turnover elicited by novelty stress. Brain Res. 2002; 926(1-2):10-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(01)03201-2. View

2.
Torregrossa M, Sanchez H, Taylor J . D-cycloserine reduces the context specificity of pavlovian extinction of cocaine cues through actions in the nucleus accumbens. J Neurosci. 2010; 30(31):10526-33. PMC: 2918879. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2523-10.2010. View

3.
Ajonijebu D, Abboussi O, Russell V, Mabandla M, Daniels W . Epigenetics: a link between addiction and social environment. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017; 74(15):2735-2747. PMC: 11107568. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-017-2493-1. View

4.
Simon OBrien E, Legastelois R, Houchi H, Vilpoux C, Alaux-Cantin S, Pierrefiche O . Fluoxetine, desipramine, and the dual antidepressant milnacipran reduce alcohol self-administration and/or relapse in dependent rats. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011; 36(7):1518-30. PMC: 3096819. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2011.37. View

5.
Liu S, Zou X, Huang X, Liu Y, Lu Q, Ling L . The Association between Living Status Transitions, Behavior Changes and Family Relationship Improvement among Methadone Maintenance Treatment Participants in Guangdong, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 17(1). PMC: 6981571. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17010119. View