» Articles » PMID: 35350870

Trends in Clinical Practice and Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery

Abstract

Background The use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to treat unprotected left main coronary artery disease has expanded rapidly in the past decade. We aimed to describe nationwide trends in clinical practice and outcomes after PCI for left main coronary artery disease. Methods and Results Patients (n=4085) enrolled in the SCAAR (Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry) as undergoing PCI for left main coronary artery disease from 2005 to 2017 were included. A count regression model was used to analyze time-related differences in procedural characteristics. The 3-year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event rate defined as death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat revascularization was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox proportional hazard model. The number of annual PCI procedures grew from 121 in 2005 to 589 in 2017 (389%). The increase was greater for men (479%) and individuals with diabetes (500%). Periprocedural complications occurred in 7.9%, decreasing from 10% to 6% during the study period. A major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event occurred in 35.7% of patients, falling from 45.6% to 23.9% (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.41-0.78; =0.001). Radial artery access rose from 21.5% to 74.2% and intracoronary diagnostic procedures from 14.0% to 53.3%. Use of bare-metal stents and first-generation drug-eluting stents fell from 19.0% and 71.9%, respectively, to 0, with use of new-generation drug-eluting stents increasing to 95.2%. Conclusions Recent changes in clinical practice relating to PCI for left main coronary artery disease are characterized by a 4-fold rise in procedures conducted, increased use of evidence-based adjunctive treatment strategies, intracoronary diagnostics, newer stents, and more favorable outcomes.

Citing Articles

Sex Differences in Patients Undergoing Left Main Stem Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Angina: Data From a National Registry.

Shamkhani W, Zathar Z, Khattak S, Nolan J, Chieffo A, Kinnaird T J Am Heart Assoc. 2024; 13(22):e036569.

PMID: 39547994 PMC: 11681398. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036569.


Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of Intravascular Lithotripsy Use During Calcified Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Riley R, Miller L, Davies R, Alaswad K, Al-Jebaje Z, Doshi D J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024; 3(2):101213.

PMID: 39132218 PMC: 11307424. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101213.


State-of-the-art percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease in Japan.

Warisawa T, Sonoda S, Yamaji K, Amano T, Kohsaka S, Natsuaki M Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024; 39(4):386-402.

PMID: 39078544 DOI: 10.1007/s12928-024-01030-4.


Temporal Trend in Revascularization for Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.

Alzahrani A, Alabbadi S, Itagaki S, Egorova N J Am Heart Assoc. 2024; 13(3):e032212.

PMID: 38240212 PMC: 11056153. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032212.


The everolimus eluting Synergy Megatron drug-eluting stent platform: Early outcomes from the European Synergy Megatron Implanters' Registry.

De Silva K, Li Kam Wa M, Wells T, Mozid A, Ladwiniec A, Hynes B Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023; 102(7):1222-1228.

PMID: 37948428 PMC: 10903108. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30902.


References
1.
Patel M, Calhoon J, Dehmer G, Grantham J, Maddox T, Maron D . ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association.... J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69(17):2212-2241. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.001. View

2.
Levine G, Bates E, Blankenship J, Bailey S, Bittl J, Cercek B . 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and.... J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58(24):e44-122. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.007. View

3.
Yamamoto K, Shiomi H, Morimoto T, Kadota K, Tada T, Takeji Y . Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graftinge Among Patients with Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in the New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Era (From the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-3). Am J Cardiol. 2021; 145:47-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.12.078. View

4.
van Zandvoort L, van Bommel R, Masdjedi K, Forero M, Lemmert M, Wilschut J . Long-term outcome in patients treated with first- versus second-generation drug-eluting stents for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 95(6):1085-1091. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28387. View

5.
Kinnaird T, Johnson T, Anderson R, Gallagher S, Sirker A, Ludman P . Intravascular Imaging and 12-Month Mortality After Unprotected Left Main Stem PCI: An Analysis From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Database. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; 13(3):346-357. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.10.007. View