» Articles » PMID: 35346839

Cerebellum Anatomy Predicts Individual Risk-taking Behavior and Risk Tolerance

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Mar 29
PMID 35346839
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Human risk tolerance is highly idiosyncratic and individuals often show distinctive preferences when faced with similar risky situations. However, the neural underpinnings of individual differences in risk-taking remain unclear. Here we combined structural and perfusion MRI and examined the associations between brain anatomy and individual risk-taking behavior/risk tolerance in a sample of 115 healthy participants during the Balloon Analogue Risk Task, a well-established sequential risky decision paradigm. Both whole brain and region-of-interest analyses showed that the left cerebellum gray matter volume (GMV) has a strong association with individual risk-taking behavior and risk tolerance, outperforming the previously reported associations with the amygdala and right posterior parietal cortex (PPC) GMV. Left cerebellum GMV also accounted for risk tolerance and risk-taking behavior changes with aging. However, regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) provided no additional predictive power. These findings suggest a novel cerebellar anatomical contribution to individual differences in risk tolerance. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the underestimated important role of cerebellum in risk-taking.

Citing Articles

A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Hot and Cool Executive Functions in Reward and Competition.

Lin H, Fung H, Wang Y, Ho R, Chen S Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(3).

PMID: 39943445 PMC: 11820429. DOI: 10.3390/s25030806.


Neuromodulation of risk and reward processing during decision making in individuals with general anxiety disorder (GAD).

Nejati V, Rad J, Rasanan A Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):371.

PMID: 39747372 PMC: 11696206. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84520-y.


Stimulating the posterior parietal cortex reduces self-reported risk-taking propensity in people with tobacco use disorder.

LoFaro F, Jordan T, Apostol M, Steele V, Konova A, Petersen N Addict Neurosci. 2024; 12.

PMID: 39329155 PMC: 11426420. DOI: 10.1016/j.addicn.2024.100160.


Multivariate analysis of multimodal brain structure predicts individual differences in risk and intertemporal preference.

Bergstrom F, Schu G, Lee S, Lerman C, Kable J bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39026787 PMC: 11257450. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.04.602046.


Adaptations of the balloon analog risk task for neuroimaging settings: a systematic review.

Compagne C, Mayer J, Gabriel D, Comte A, Magnin E, Bennabi D Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1237734.

PMID: 37790591 PMC: 10544912. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1237734.


References
1.
Diedrichsen J, Zotow E . Surface-Based Display of Volume-Averaged Cerebellar Imaging Data. PLoS One. 2015; 10(7):e0133402. PMC: 4521932. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133402. View

2.
Ahn W, Haines N, Zhang L . Revealing Neurocomputational Mechanisms of Reinforcement Learning and Decision-Making With the hBayesDM Package. Comput Psychiatr. 2018; 1:24-57. PMC: 5869013. DOI: 10.1162/CPSY_a_00002. View

3.
Barton R . Embodied cognitive evolution and the cerebellum. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012; 367(1599):2097-107. PMC: 3385677. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0112. View

4.
Buckner R, Krienen F, Castellanos A, Diaz J, Yeo B . The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol. 2011; 106(5):2322-45. PMC: 3214121. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00339.2011. View

5.
Boehm U, Steingroever H, Wagenmakers E . Using Bayesian regression to test hypotheses about relationships between parameters and covariates in cognitive models. Behav Res Methods. 2017; 50(3):1248-1269. PMC: 5990586. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0940-4. View